Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRohan Denner Modified over 10 years ago
1
From Imagery to Map: Digital Photogrammetric Technologies 13 th International Scientific and Technical Conference From Imagery to Map: Digital Photogrammetric Technologies Scientific UAS training for mapping Smirnov Alexey Manager of Technical Support Department, Racurs September 2013, Fontainebleau, France
2
Scientific training area MIIGAiK Department of photogrammetry June 2013
3
UAS Models GeoScan 101Gatewing X100 Ptero-E5
4
Objectives Process Ptero UAS imagery with high-precision projection centers coordinates Compare accuracy of adjustment for Ptero data over small area vs whole block Compare accuracy of adjustment results from different UAS models
5
Technological workflow Orthophoto control DEMAerotriangulation
6
Objects Area 4 sq.km.Road 5 km.
7
Testing with accurate centers (Ptero) GPS position adjustment accuracy (using Obninsk base station) is 6 cm * * By GNSS+ company
8
Spatial offset Offset vector : x=0.047 m, y=0.110 m, z=0.194 m
9
Time offset Nikon D800NovAtel OEM615 Synchronization problem is caused by two-curtain shutter
10
Adjustment result by centers Errors Projection Centers ~30 cm by XY Check points ~33 cm by XY ~20 cm by Z ~34 cm by Z GCD – 2 cm
11
Adjustment result by centers and GCPs Errors Projection Centers ~30 cm by XY Check points ~16 cm by XY ~16 cm by Z GCD – 2 cm
12
Orthophoto quality GSD – 2 cm
13
Orthophoto accuracy (relative) Positional accuracy Δ ~ 18 cm Vectors from stereo of DiMAC survey
14
Orthophoto accuracy (absolute) E abs Δmin. – 6 cm Δmax. – 16 cm Accuracy corresponds to scale 1:2000
15
Small test area (Ptero) Errors Projection Centers ~17 cm by XY Check points ~7 cm by XY ~10 cm by Z ~9 cm by Z
16
Small test area (Ptero) E abs Δmin. – 2 cm Δmax. – 7 cm Accuracy corresponds to scale 1:1000
17
Small test area (GeoScan) Errors Projection Centers ~3 m by XY Check points ~22 cm by XY ~16 m by Z ~30 cm by Z GSD – 7.2 cm
18
Small test area (GeoScan) E abs Δmin. – 13 cm Δmax. – 23 cm Accuracy corresponds to scale 1:2000
19
Small test area (Gatewing) Errors Projection Centers ~7.5 m by XY Check points ~6 cm by XY ~20 m by Z ~18 cm by Z GSD – 4.7 cm
20
Small test area (Gatewing) E abs Δmin. – 14 cm Δmax. – 22 cm Accuracy corresponds to scale 1:2000
21
Difference ModelsCamera altitude, m Number of frames Area, sq.m. Centers accuracy Orthophoto accuracy (absolute), cm GSD, cm/pix Ptero-E5 Nikon D800 (calibrated) ~250 97280 ~17 cm by XY ~10 cm by Z 7 2.2 GeoScan 101 Sony NEX- 5R ~200 38800 ~3 m by XY ~16 m by Z 23 7.2 Gatewing X100 Ricoh-GR ~150 130360 ~7.5 m by XY ~20 m by Z 22 4.7
22
Conclusions Prerequisites for obtaining large scale orthophoto Use differential GNSS for projection centers coordinates Avoid large heading-pitch-roll angles Use appropriate ground control Use appropriate GSD Use calibrated camera
23
Thank you for attention
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.