Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION DECEMBER 12, 2014 Post Registration Proof of Use Pilot Results and Beyond 1.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION DECEMBER 12, 2014 Post Registration Proof of Use Pilot Results and Beyond 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION DECEMBER 12, 2014 Post Registration Proof of Use Pilot Results and Beyond 1

2 Data Through October 15, 2014 Beginning in July 2012, 500 registrations filing Section 8 or 71 Declarations of Use were randomly selected to participate in “proof of use” pilot 97% (486) of registrations completed the pilot 51% (253) of registrations unable to verify previously claimed use  35% deleted goods/services queried under the pilot  16% failed to respond to pilot Office actions and were cancelled 81% (406) of registrations received notices of acceptance (includes notices issued after goods/services queried under the pilot were deleted) 2

3 Deletions/Cancellations/Acceptances by Registration Basis Basis for Registration Percentage of Registrations Selected for the Pilot Deleting Goods/Services Queried Under the Pilot Percentage of Registrations Selected for the Pilot Receiving Notices of Cancellation Percentage of Registrations Selected for the Pilot Receiving Notices of Acceptance (Including for a Narrowed Scope of Goods/Services) Section 1(a)27%18%80% Section 44(e)58%7%89% Section 66(a)59%14%82% Combined Section 1(a) and 44(e) 63%13%81% 3

4 Deletions/Cancellations/Acceptances by Registration Basis 4

5 Continuing the Dialogue: Ongoing Efforts? Suggestion 1: Create streamlined non-use expungement procedure (analogous to the Canadian expungement proceedings under Section 45 of the Trade-marks Act).  Third parties could request USPTO to require an owner to prove use of mark for protected goods/services.  If the owner complies, procedure completed.  If not, any goods/services for which the owner has not provided the requisite proof would be deleted from the registration. 5

6 Continuing the Dialogue: Ongoing Efforts? Suggestion 2(A): Require specimens for all goods/services listed in the registration when the first Section 8 or 71 declaration is filed; or Suggestion 2(B): Require specimens for all goods/services listed in the registration when the first Section 8 or 71 declaration is filed, and:  Require specimen to be a photo showing use of the mark in conjunction with claimed goods  Require advertisement for the services 6

7 Continuing the Dialogue: Ongoing Efforts? Suggestion 3: Increase the solemnity of the declaration.  For example, (1) require the trademark owner to check a box stating that he/she understands the seriousness of the oath; or  (2) require statements accompanying Section 8 and 71 declarations detailing steps taken to verify use with the goods/services in the registration. 7

8 Continuing the Dialogue: Ongoing Efforts? Suggestion 4: Conduct random audits of Section 8 and 71 declarations.  Require a Section 7 Request (along with the required fee) to delete any goods/services queried by the USPTO for which proof of use cannot be provided. 8

9 Continuing the Dialogue: Ongoing Efforts? Other suggestions/comments? 9


Download ppt "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION DECEMBER 12, 2014 Post Registration Proof of Use Pilot Results and Beyond 1."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google