1. Ingress Version 2 Launch Meeting and Demo September 9, 2009 1

2. Agenda  Review of Ingress  Goals and objectives  General issues and opportunities  Ingress Version 2 Introduction  Why  What  When  v2 BETA demo  Other Issues; Open Q&A 2

3. Ingress – A Brief History  Original challenge – regional access to secure applications  County applications went “live” ~18 months ago  BARS  JILS  ANI  All required shared security model  Ingress Version 1 “live” in October 2007  Agency Registrars created users, granted access  Single sign-on for county applications  Result: Federated user administration model 3

4. Good/Bad Features of Ingress  Good  Single source for regional applications  Single sign-on for applications  Very strong security model  Resonable administration for >4,000 users from >45 agencies  Not so good (a.k.a. Bad)  Limited to three King County applications  Some difficulties with user management  “Opportunities”  LSJ-I “portal” project  Insufficient funding for KCPCA “DIGS” project 4

5. Ingress v2 Objectives  Expand on prior concepts  Single consolidated point of access to information  Integrated search capability (expanding JILS)  Further incorporation of information sources  Integrated and consolidated access to data across systems  Query tools to support searches across applications  Applicable inclusion of “public realm” information  Vision: A portal for criminal justice practitioners 5

6. Ingress Portal Model (example: iGoogle) 6

7. Ingress Model Basic Concepts  Continue to provide access to regional systems  Applications are primary source of data/information  Expand to support new systems (agency/ad hoc)  Provide information at user’s request  User adds and removes information  User decides where the information is on screen  Allow customization to fit individual needs  Users can tailor to fit their operations  Users can tailor to fit their preferences 7

8. Timeline & Functionality Release 1/111/1 10/1 9/18/17/16/112/1 Phase 1 6/1 – 9/3 Beta Assessment 9/9 – 10/31 Phase 2 11/1 – 1/15?  Phase 1 – Framework and Beta  Portal Framework  Standard Widgets  Bookmarks Widget  Application Launch Widget  External Application Widget  RSS Feed Widgets  Twitter Widgets  Phase II – Full Version 2  Advanced Widget Administration  Agency Alerts and Notifications  Unified Search  Sending Results  Saving Results Bookmarks Widget may include:  PAO Online Victim Assistance and Abuse Information  Public Defense Services  Court Jury Information  State AMBER Alerts Application Launch Widgets may include  Booking and Referral System (BARS)  Jail Inmate Lookup System (JILS)  AFIS Name Index (ANI) External Applications Widget may include:  DJA ECR Online System  King County Sex Offender Search  RAIN  LInX 8

9. v2 BETA Demo 9

10. What’s Next  Agency use of “Beta”  All agency users are “loaded” into Beta now  We are NOT reconciling logons between Ingress versions  Beta will improve over next two months  Addition and improvement of how applications are presented in widgets  Addition of new “widgets”  Looking for user feedback!!!  Future transition to v2  At this time, users may use EITHER v1 or v2 Beta  Recommend doing an agency training and conversion  When v2 goes “live” (dates TBD) we will work with agencies to reconcile user accounts  At that time, agencies will have 30 days to transition users 10

11. Q&A 11