1. Best practices in teaching/learning health advocacy in medical schools – a systematic review Dr Indira Samarawickrema Australian National University A/Prof Christine Phillips Australian National University Prof Donna Mak University of Notre Dame

2. Introduction Conventionally focused on individual patient care, access to care and direct socio-economic influences 1. Greater engagement in improving the health of populations and systems of care 2. Health advocate – Australia 3, USA, Canada 4 2

3. Knowledge and skills required for a generalist medical graduate “innovative, collaborative, participatory and transformative approaches” 5,6,7 –Identify, define, strategic partners, a strategic action plan, an effective message” 5 Need reasoning and communication skills 4. 3

4. Aims and objectives To systematically review publications on teaching/learning advocacy in medical schools –Identify best practice methods in developing skills in health advocacy among medical students. 4

5. Research question What are the best practice methods in developing skills in health advocacy among medical students? 5

6. PICOS Participants- medical students Intervention: health advocacy modules with hands-on experience Comparisons: health advocacy modules without hands-on experience Outcomes: Skills in advocacy as evident with evaluations Study design: experimental and/or evaluation 6

7. Methods We carried out a systematic review of publications Database: PubMed, ERIC via NLM Search terms: “advocacy” and “medic*” in the article Time period: 1 st Jan 2011 to 14 Sept 2014 7

8. N=31 N=26 Initial screening N=1300 Duplicates = 96 N=1204 Does not mention medical students =1173 Not in English = 3 N=4 Commentaries = 2 Does not address teaching/learning in curriculum; exclude electives

9. Results Four from medical schools in North America –Three from USA –One from Canada None from Australia 9

10. Table 1: Summary of included studies Intervent ion Com paris on Outcome s Study design Findings Belkowitz, et al 2013 (Universit y of Miami Miller) 8 Y1&2 communit y health advocacy training in regional campus (RCM) Main camp us (MC) Attitudes, self- reported and objective knowledg e, and skills Cross- section al RCM higher scores>MC (p<0.01) Mean knowledge -community health needs (35 vs 31) -About CBOs (3 vs 2.7) -Community resources (5 vs 2) Mean skill scores -13 vs 11 Attitudes -Female>male 10

11. Table 1: Summary of included studies (contd.) Intervent ion Com paris on Outcome s Study design Findings Gill & Gill 2011 (Universit y of Alberta and University of Calgary) 9 Political Action Day with Members of Legislativ e Assembly (2-days) NoneAttitudes, self- reported knowledg e, and skills Pre- and post- survey Improved skills - Advocacy concepts - How to efficiently organize a meeting with an elected official - How to approach lobbying an issue at a population level Require - More in-depth Teaching 11

12. Table 1: Summary of included studies (contd.) Intervent ion Com paris on Outcome s Study design Findings Huntoon et al 2012 (AMSA at National Advocacy day) 10 ½ day advocacy experienc e at Capitol Hill NoneKnowledg e, skills and attitudes towards legislative advocacy Pre- and post- survey -Contact their legislators (p = 0.03) -Meet in person (p<0.01), -Advocate for population health needs (p = 0.04). -Role of a physician advocate (p = 0.03). -Formal curricula insufficient -Plan to engage in legislative advocacy activities in the future (p<0.01) 12

13. Table 1: Summary of included studies (contd.) Intervent ion Com paris on Outcome s Study design Findings Long et al 2011 (Universit y of Colorado Denver) 11 Leadershi p Educatio n Advocacy Develop ment Scholars hip program NoneKnowledg e, skills and attitudes towards legislative advocacy Pre- and post- summe r interns hip Empowerment, improved self-efficacy, and increased likelihood of future engagement in leadership and health Advocacy (p<0.05) 13

14. Discussion In-class + hands-on modules. Diverse experiential learning –Advocacy projects/internships with CBOs –Legislative advocacy Evaluation of hands-on modules –Improved skills –Empowerment –Likelihood of future engagement –Self-efficacy –Rated highly by students. 14

15. Discussion Small scale initiatives not integrated into the broader population health curricula. Lacks a more robust positioning of advocacy within the curriculum. 15

16. AMC new medical graduate outcomes and advocacy 3 One of the four domains Two of the first three outcome standards in that domain How to advocate for others (not only about populations and inequality) Knowledge, some exposure to the concepts and a public health responsibility 16

17. Challenges of teaching specialised skills to generalist medical graduates How a generalist could apply it in their normal daily practice. Ethics of advocacy –Potential to cause harm to people and communities Adaptability of focused skills No evidence that the education translated into better medical practice? 17

18. Limitations Grey literature not included Unpublished Teaching to the interested only Self-education 18

19. Conclusions Hands-on teaching/learning activities improved skills in advocacy among medical students in North America. More work is required to assess the breadth and effectiveness of medical school health advocacy teaching programs in Australia. 19

20. References 1.Gruen RL, Pearson SD, Brennan TA. Physician-citizens-public roles and professional obligations. JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):94-8. 2.Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923-58. 3.Medical Board of Australia. Accreditation standards for primary medical education providers and their program of study and graduate outcome statements. Canberra: Medical Board of Australia 2012. 4.Frank JR, editor. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Office of Education, The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005. Earnest MA, Wong SL, Federico SG. Perspective: Physician advocacy: what is it and how do we do it. Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):63-7. 5.Earnest MA, Wong SL, Federico SG. Perspective: Physician advocacy: what is it and how do we do it. Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):63-7. 6.Martin D, Hum S, Han M, Whitehead. Laying the foundation: teaching policy and advocacy to medical students. Med Teach. 2013 May;35:352-8. 7.Dharamsi S, Ho A, Spadafora SM, Woolard R. The physician as health advocate: translating the quest for social responsibility in medical education and practice. Acad Med. 2011 Sep;86(9):1108-13. 8.Belkovitz J, SandersLM, Zhang C, Agarwal G, etal. Teaching health advocacy to medical students: a comparison study. J Public Health Manag Prac. 2013 Dec 6 (Epub ahead of print) 9.Huntoon KM, McCluney CJ, Wiley EA, Scannell CA, Bruno R, Stull MJ. Self-reported evaluation of competencies and attitudes by physicians-in-training before and after a single day legislative advocacy experience. BMC Med Educ. 2012 Jun 22;12-47. 10.Gill PJ, Gill HS. Health advocaccy training: why are physicians withholding life saving care: Med Teach. 2011;33(8):677-9. 11.Long JA, Lee RS, Federico S, Battaglia C, Wong S, Earnest M. Developing leadership and advocacy skills in medical students through service learning. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Jul-Aug: 17(4); 369-72. 20