Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDavion Nickell Modified over 10 years ago
1
Last Time T Distribution –Confidence Intervals –Hypothesis tests Relationships Between Variables –Scatterplots (visualization) Aspects of Relations –Form –Direction –Strength
2
Reading In Textbook Approximate Reading for Today’s Material: Pages 101-105, 447-465, 511-516 Approximate Reading for Next Class: Pages 110-135, 560-574
3
Scatterplot E.g. Class Example 16: How does HW score predict Final Exam? x i = HW, y i = Final Exam i.In top half of HW scores: Better HW Better Final
4
Important Aspects of Relations I.Form of Relationship II.Direction of Relationship III.Strength of Relationship
5
I.Form of Relationship Linear: Data approximately follow a line Previous Class Scores Example http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls Final vs. High values of HW is “best” Nonlinear: Data follows different pattern Nice Example: Bralower’s Fossil Data http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg17.xls
6
Bralower’s Fossil Data http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg17.xls From T. Bralower, formerly of Geological Sci.T. BralowerGeological Sci. Studies Global Climate, millions of years ago
7
II. Direction of Relationship Positive Association X bigger Y bigger Negative Association X bigger Y smaller Note: Concept doesn’t always apply: Bralower’s Fossil Data
8
III. Strength of Relationship Idea: How close are points to lying on a line? Revisit Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls
9
Comparing Scatterplots Additional Useful Visual Tool
10
Comparing Scatterplots Additional Useful Visual Tool: Overlaying multiple data sets
11
Comparing Scatterplots Additional Useful Visual Tool: Overlaying multiple data sets Allows comparison
12
Comparing Scatterplots Additional Useful Visual Tool: Overlaying multiple data sets Allows comparison Use different colors or symbols
13
Comparing Scatterplots Additional Useful Visual Tool: Overlaying multiple data sets Allows comparison Use different colors or symbols Easy in EXCEL (colors are automatic)
14
Comparing Scatterplots HW HW: 2.21, 2.25
15
III. Strength of Relationship Idea: How close are points to lying on a line? Revisit Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls
16
III. Strength of Relationship Idea: How close are points to lying on a line? Now get quantitative
17
Section 2.2: Correlation Main Idea: Quantify Strength of Relationship
18
Section 2.2: Correlation Main Idea: Quantify Strength of Relationship Context: –A numerical summary
19
Section 2.2: Correlation Main Idea: Quantify Strength of Relationship Context: –A numerical summary –In spirit of mean and standard deviation
20
Section 2.2: Correlation Main Idea: Quantify Strength of Relationship Context: –A numerical summary –In spirit of mean and standard deviation –But now applies to pairs of variables
21
Section 2.2: Correlation Main Idea: Quantify Strength of Relationship Specific Goals
22
Section 2.2: Correlation Main Idea: Quantify Strength of Relationship Specific Goals: –Near 1: for positive relat’ship & nearly linear
23
Section 2.2: Correlation Main Idea: Quantify Strength of Relationship Specific Goals: –Near 1: for positive relat’ship & nearly linear –> 0: for positive relationship (slopes up)
24
Section 2.2: Correlation Main Idea: Quantify Strength of Relationship Specific Goals: –Near 1: for positive relat’ship & nearly linear –> 0: for positive relationship (slopes up) –= 0: for no relationship
25
Section 2.2: Correlation Main Idea: Quantify Strength of Relationship Specific Goals: –Near 1: for positive relat’ship & nearly linear –> 0: for positive relationship (slopes up) –= 0: for no relationship –< 0: for negative relationship (slopes down)
26
Section 2.2: Correlation Main Idea: Quantify Strength of Relationship Specific Goals: –Near 1: for positive relat’ship & nearly linear –> 0: for positive relationship (slopes up) –= 0: for no relationship –< 0: for negative relationship (slopes down) –Near -1: for negative relat’ship & nearly linear
27
Correlation - Approach Numerical Approach
28
Correlation - Approach Numerical Approach: for symmetric around
29
Correlation - Approach Numerical Approach: for symmetric around has similar properties
30
Correlation - Approach Numerical Approach: for symmetric around has similar properties Worked out Example : http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg18-new.xls
31
Correlation – Graphical View Plots (a) & (b): illustrating : > 0 for positive relationship
32
Correlation – Graphical View Plots (a) & (b): illustrating : > 0 for positive relationship
33
Correlation – Graphical View Plots (a) & (b): illustrating : > 0 for positive relationship < 0 for negative relationship
34
Correlation – Graphical View Plots (a) & (b): illustrating : > 0 for positive relationship < 0 for negative relationship
35
Correlation – Graphical View Plots (a) & (b): illustrating : Bigger for data closer to line
36
Correlation – Graphical View Plots (a) & (b): illustrating : Bigger for data closer to line
37
Correlation – Graphical View But not all goals are satisfied
38
Correlation – Graphical View Problem 1: Not between -1 & 1
39
Correlation – Graphical View Problem 2: Feels “Scale”, see plot (c) (just 10 1 vertical rescaling of)
40
Correlation – Graphical View Problem 2: Feels “Scale”, see plot (c) (just 10 1 vertical rescaling of) ( feels factor of 1/10)
41
Correlation – Graphical View Problem 3: Feels “Shift” even more, see (d) (even gets sign wrong!)
42
Correlation – Graphical View Problem 3: Feels “Shift” even more, see (d) (even gets sign wrong!) Data trend upwards
43
Correlation – Graphical View Problem 3: Feels “Shift” even more, see (d) (even gets sign wrong!) Data trend upwards But < 0
44
Correlation - Approach Solution to above problems
45
Correlation - Approach Solution to above problems: Standardize!
46
Correlation - Approach Solution to above problems: Standardize! Define Correlation
47
Correlation - Approach Solution to above problems: Standardize! Define Correlation
48
Correlation - Example Revisit above example http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg18-new.xls r is always same, and ~1, for (a)
49
Correlation - Example Revisit above example http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg18-new.xls r is always same, and ~1, for (a), (c)
50
Correlation - Example Revisit above example http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg18-new.xls r is always same, and ~1, for (a), (c), (d)
51
Correlation - Example Revisit above example http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg18-new.xls r is always same, and ~1, for (a), (c), (d) r < 0, and not so close to -1, for (b)
52
Correlation - Example Revisit Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls Final Exam vs. HW Correlation = r = 0.73 Strongest Dependence
53
Correlation - Example Revisit Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls MT1 vs. HW Correlation = r = 0.65 Weaker Dependence
54
Correlation - Example Revisit Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls MT2 vs. MT1 Correlation = r = 0.57 Weakest Dependence
55
Correlation - Example Revisit Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls r is always > 0 (makes sense, since all trend upwards)
56
Correlation - Example Revisit Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls r is always > 0 r is biggest for Final vs. HW
57
Correlation - Example Revisit Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls r is always > 0 r is biggest for Final vs. HW (visually strongest relationship)
58
Correlation - Example Revisit Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls r is always > 0 r is biggest for Final vs. HW (visually strongest relationship) r is smallest for MT2 vs. MT1
59
Correlation - Example Revisit Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls r is always > 0 r is biggest for Final vs. HW (visually strongest relationship) r is smallest for MT2 vs. MT1 (visually weakest relationship)
60
Correlation – Computation From Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls
61
Correlation – Computation From Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls Use Excel function: CORREL
62
Correlation – Computation From Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls Use Excel function: CORREL
63
Correlation – Computation From Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls Use Excel function: CORREL Range of Xs
64
Correlation – Computation From Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls Use Excel function: CORREL Range of Xs Range of Ys
65
Correlation – Computation From Class Scores Example: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg16.xls Use Excel function: CORREL Range of Xs Range of Ys Output is correlation, r
66
Correlation - Example Fun Example from Publisher’s Website: http://courses.bfwpub.com/ips6e.php
67
Correlation - Example Fun Example from Publisher’s Website: http://courses.bfwpub.com/ips6e.php Choose Statistical Applets
68
Correlation - Example Fun Example from Publisher’s Website: http://courses.bfwpub.com/ips6e.php Choose Statistical Applets Correlation and Regression
69
Correlation - Example Fun Example from Publisher’s Website: http://courses.bfwpub.com/ips6e.php Choose Statistical Applets Correlation and Regression Gives feeling for how correlation is affected by changing data.
70
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet
71
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet I clicked to put down 2 points
72
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet I clicked to put down 2 points Applet computed correlation, r
73
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Applet computed correlation, r r = -1, since points on line trending down
74
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Try several points close to some line
75
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Try several points close to some line r ≈ -1, since points near line trending down
76
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Add more points with goal of r ≈ -0.95
77
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Add more points with goal of r ≈ -0.95
78
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Add more points with goal of r ≈ -0.95
79
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Now add a single outlier
80
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Now add a single outlier Major impact on r -0.95 -0.35
81
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Just 2 more outliers
82
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Just 2 more outliers Leads to r > 0
83
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Just 2 more outliers Leads to r > 0 (Outliers have major impact)
84
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Weakness of correlation, r
85
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Weakness of correlation, r Measures linear dependence
86
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Weakness of correlation, r Can have r ≈ 0
87
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Weakness of correlation, r Can have r ≈ 0, yet strong non-linear dependence
88
Correlation - HW HW: 2.31 2.33 2.39a
89
Correlation - Outliers Caution: Outliers can strongly affect correlation, r
90
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Add more points with goal of r ≈ -0.95
91
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Now add a single outlier Major impact on r -0.95 -0.35
92
Correlation - Example Correlation and Regression Applet Just 2 more outliers Leads to r > 0 (Outliers have major impact)
93
Correlation - Outliers Caution: Outliers can strongly affect correlation, r HW: 2.39b 2.45
94
Research Corner Relationship between more than 2 variables?
95
Research Corner Relationship between more than 2 variables? Each data point is (x 1, x 2, …, x d ) Called a “d-tuple”
96
Research Corner Relationship between more than 2 variables? Each data point is (x 1, x 2, …, x d ) Eg: d = 3 (ordered triple)
97
Research Corner Relationship between more than 2 variables? Each data point is (x 1, x 2, …, x d ) Eg: d = 3 (ordered triple) (height, weight, age)
98
Research Corner Relationship between more than 2 variables? Each data point is (x 1, x 2, …, x d ) Eg: d = 3 (ordered triple) (height, weight, age) (HW, MT1, Final)
99
Research Corner Visualization?
100
Research Corner Visualization? What is “scatterplot”?
101
Research Corner Visualization? What is “scatterplot”? How can we “see” structure in data?
102
Research Corner Visualization? Explore d = 3 (3d)
103
Research Corner Visualization? Explore d = 3 (3d) So can visualize “point cloud”
104
Research Corner Toy Example, modeling “gene expression”
105
Research Corner Multivariate View: Highlight one
106
Research Corner Multivariate View: Value of variable 1
107
Research Corner Multivariate View: Value of variable 2
108
Research Corner Multivariate View: Value of variable 3
109
Research Corner Multivariate View: 1-d projection, X-axis
110
Research Corner Multivariate View: X – Projection, 1-d View
111
Research Corner Multivariate View: 1-d projection, Y-axis
112
Research Corner Multivariate View: Y – Projection, 1-d View
113
Research Corner Multivariate View: 1-d projection, Z-axis
114
Research Corner Multivariate View: Z – Projection, 1-d View
115
Research Corner Multivariate View: 2-d Projection XY-plane
116
Research Corner Multivariate View: XY – projection, 2-d view
117
Research Corner Multivariate View: 2-d Projection XZ-plane
118
Research Corner Multivariate View: XZ – projection, 2-d view
119
Research Corner Multivariate View: 2-d Projection YZ-plane
120
Research Corner Multivariate View: YZ – projection, 2-d view
121
Research Corner Multivariate View: All 3 planes
122
Research Corner Multivariate View Now collect these views on a single page
123
Research Corner Multivariate View: 1-d projections on diagonal
124
Research Corner Multivariate View: 2-d views off diagonal
125
Research Corner Multivariate View: switch off color (usual view)
126
Research Corner Multivariate View (Useful summary of structure in data)
127
2 Sample Inference Main Idea: Previously studied single populations
128
2 Sample Inference Main Idea: Previously studied single populations Modeled as
129
2 Sample Inference Main Idea: Previously studied single populations Modeled as: –Measurement Error
130
2 Sample Inference Main Idea: Previously studied single populations Modeled as: –Measurement Error
131
2 Sample Inference Main Idea: Previously studied single populations Modeled as: –Measurement Error –Counts
132
2 Sample Inference Main Idea: Previously studied single populations Modeled as: –Measurement Error –Counts
133
2 Sample Inference Main Idea: Previously studied single populations Modeled as: –Measurement Error –Counts Did Inference
134
2 Sample Inference Main Idea: Previously studied single populations Modeled as: –Measurement Error –Counts Did Inference: –Confidence Intervals –Hypothesis Tests
135
2 Sample Inference Main Idea: Extend to two populations Modeled as: –Measurement Error –Counts Will Develop Inference: –Confidence Intervals –Hypothesis Tests
136
2 Sample Inference Location in Text
137
2 Sample Inference Location in Text: Measurement Error –Sec. 7.1 –Sec. 7.2
138
2 Sample Inference Location in Text: Measurement Error –Sec. 7.1 –Sec. 7.2 Counts –Sec. 8.2
139
2 Sample Measurement Error Easy Case: Paired Differences
140
2 Sample Measurement Error Easy Case: Paired Differences Have Treatment 1:
141
2 Sample Measurement Error Easy Case: Paired Differences Have Treatment 1: Treatment 2:
142
2 Sample Measurement Error Easy Case: Paired Differences Have Treatment 1: Treatment 2:
143
2 Sample Measurement Error Easy Case: Paired Differences Have Treatment 1: Treatment 2: Important: Measurements Connected
144
2 Sample Measurement Error Easy Case: Paired Differences Have Treatment 1: Treatment 2: Important: Measurements Connected, e.g. made on same objects
145
2 Sample Measurement Error Easy Case: Paired Differences Have Treatment 1: Treatment 2: Approach: Apply 1 sample methods
146
2 Sample Measurement Error Easy Case: Paired Differences Have Treatment 1: Treatment 2: Approach: Apply 1 sample methods to:
147
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: Researchers studying Vitamin C in a product were concerned about loss of Vitamin C during shipment and storage.
148
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: Researchers studying Vitamin C in a product were concerned about loss of Vitamin C during shipment and storage. They marked a collection of bags at the factory, and measured the vitamin C
149
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: Researchers studying Vitamin C in a product were concerned about loss of Vitamin C during shipment and storage. They marked a collection of bags at the factory, and measured the vitamin C. 5 months later, in Haiti, they found the same bags, and again measured the Vitamin C.
150
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: The data are the two Vitamin C measurements, made for each bag.
151
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: The data are the two Vitamin C measurements, made for each bag. Available in Class Example 15: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls
152
2 Paired Samples Available in Class Example 15: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls
153
2 Paired Samples Available in Class Example 15: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls Factory, Cells B38:B64
154
2 Paired Samples Available in Class Example 15: http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls Factory, Cells B38:B64 Haiti, Cells C38:C64
155
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: The data are the two Vitamin C measurements, made for each bag.
156
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: The data are the two Vitamin C measurements, made for each bag. a.Set up hypotheses to examine the question of interest.
157
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: The data are the two Vitamin C measurements, made for each bag. a.Set up hypotheses to examine the question of interest. b.Perform the significance test, and summarize the result.
158
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: The data are the two Vitamin C measurements, made for each bag. a.Set up hypotheses to examine the question of interest. b.Perform the significance test, and summarize the result. c.Find 95% CIs for the factory mean, and the Haiti mean, and the mean change.
159
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: a. Sample average difference = Computed as:
160
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: a. Sample average difference = Computed as:
161
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: a. Sample average difference = Computed as:
162
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: a. Sample average difference = Computed as: Then average
163
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: a. Sample average difference = Some evidence factory is bigger, is it strong evidence???
164
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: a. Sample average difference = Some evidence factory is bigger, is it strong evidence??? Let = Difference: Haiti – Factory
165
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: a. Sample average difference = Some evidence factory is bigger, is it strong evidence??? Let = Difference: Haiti – Factory 1-sided, from “idea of loss”
166
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.
167
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.
168
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.
169
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.
170
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.
171
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b. But recall how TDIST works (1 – tail: upper probability only)
172
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b. But recall how TDIST works: = (symmetry)
173
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b. But recall how TDIST works: = So compute with:
174
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.Excel Computation: Class Example 15, Part 3 http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls
175
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.Excel Computation: Class Example 15, Part 3 http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls Standard deviation of differences, s D
176
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.Excel Computation: Class Example 15, Part 3 http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls Standard deviation of differences, s D P-value
177
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.Excel Computation: Class Example 15, Part 3 http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls P-value = 1.87 x 10 -5
178
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.Excel Computation: Class Example 15, Part 3 http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls P-value = 1.87 x 10 -5 Interpretation: very strong evidence
179
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: b.Excel Computation: Class Example 15, Part 3 http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls P-value = 1.87 x 10 -5 Interpretation: very strong evidence either yes-no or gray level
180
2 Paired Samples Variations: 1.EXCEL function TTEST is useful here
181
2 Paired Samples Variations: 1.EXCEL function TTEST is useful here
182
2 Paired Samples Variations: 1.EXCEL function TTEST is useful here (same answer as above)
183
2 Paired Samples Variations: 1.EXCEL function TTEST is useful here Notes: a.Type is paired (discuss others later)
184
2 Paired Samples Variations: 1.EXCEL function TTEST is useful here Notes: a.Type is paired (discuss others later) b.Get same answer from swapping Array 1 and Array 2
185
2 Paired Samples Variations: 1.EXCEL function TTEST is useful here Notes: a.Type is paired (discuss others later) b.Get same answer from swapping Array 1 and Array 2
186
2 Paired Samples Variations: 1.EXCEL function TTEST is useful here Notes: a.Type is paired (discuss others later) b.Get same answer from swapping Array 1 and Array 2 c.This is something Excel does well
187
2 Paired Samples Variations: 2.Can also use: Data Data Analysis T-test Paired
188
2 Paired Samples Variations: 2.Can also use: Data Data Analysis T-test Paired to give detailed results
189
2 Paired Samples Variations: 2.Can also use: Data Data Analysis T-test Paired to give detailed results e.g. d.f. = 26
190
2 Paired Samples Variations: 2.Can also use: Data Data Analysis T-test Paired to give detailed results e.g. d.f. = 26 P-value same
191
2 Paired Samples Variations: 2.Can also use: Data Data Analysis T-test Paired to give detailed results e.g. d.f. = 26 P-value same (others we haven’t learned yet)
192
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: c.Confidence Intervals See Class Example 15, Part 3c http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls Margin of error =
193
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: c.Confidence Intervals See Class Example 15, Part 3c http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls Margin of error = (same as above, but NORMINV TINV)
194
2 Paired Samples E.g. Old Textbook 7.32: c.Confidence Intervals See Class Example 15, Part 3c http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg15.xls Margin of error = (same as above, but NORMINV TINV) So CI has endpoints:
195
Paired Sampling CIs & Tests HW: 7.33, 7.35, 7.39 Interpret P-values: (i) yes-no (ii) gray-level (suggestion: use TTEST, for hypo tests)
196
And now for something completely different… Does the statement, “We've always done it like that” ring any bells? The US standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number. Why was that gauge used?
197
And now for something completely different… Because that's the way they built them in England, and English expatriates built the US Railroads. Why did the English build them like that? Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used.
198
And now for something completely different… Why did "they" use that gauge then? Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing.
199
And now for something completely different… Okay! Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing? Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads in England, because that's the spacing of the wheel ruts.
200
And now for something completely different… So who built those old rutted roads? Imperial Rome built the first long distance roads in Europe (and England ) for their legions. The roads have been used ever since. And the ruts in the roads? Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels. Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing.
201
And now for something completely different… The United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot. And bureaucracies live forever. So the next time you are handed a specification and wonder what horse's ass came up with it, you may be exactly right, because the Imperial Roman army chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the back ends of two war horses!
202
And now for something completely different… When you see a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at their factory at Utah. The engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site.
203
And now for something completely different… The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains. The SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses' behinds. So, a major Space Shuttle design feature of what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse's ass.
204
And now for something completely different… - And – you thought being a HORSE'S ASS wasn't important!
205
Carolina Course Evaluation Please give me your opinions
206
Carolina Course Evaluation Please give me your opinions Most highly sought: Written suggestions for improvement
207
Carolina Course Evaluation Please give me your opinions Most highly sought: Written suggestions for improvement Please fill out with # 2 pencil (black pen?)
208
Carolina Course Evaluation Please give me your opinions Most highly sought: Written suggestions for improvement Please fill out with # 2 pencil (black pen?) Return to student volunteer Will turn in independently from me
209
Carolina Course Evaluation Please give me your opinions Most highly sought: Written suggestions for improvement Please fill out with # 2 pencil (black pen?) Return to student volunteer Will turn in independently from me Dept/Course/Section: STOR 155 001 Instructor: J. S. Marron
210
STOR 155 001, Course ID: 30211211 28.Over the course of the semester, how frequently did you review the audio/screen recordings? (S/D) Never. I didn't know that they were available. (D) Never. I decided not to. (N) Seldom (A) Sometimes (S/A) Often 29.Did you review the recordings before taking a test or exam? (S/D) Yes / (S/A) No 30.Did you review the recordings after you missed class? (S/D) Yes / (S/A) No 31.Did you review the recordings when you didn't understand something from class? (S/D) Yes / (S/A) No 32.The recordings were helpful for me as a study aid. (S/D D N A S/A) 33.I was less likely to attend class because I knew I would have access to the lecture materials online. (S/D D N A S/A)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.