Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Workshop: Protecting market position IP Finance and Monetisation Conference, Krakow, 6-7 September 2012 Richard Vary Head of Litigation, Nokia 1 Personal.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Workshop: Protecting market position IP Finance and Monetisation Conference, Krakow, 6-7 September 2012 Richard Vary Head of Litigation, Nokia 1 Personal."— Presentation transcript:

1 Workshop: Protecting market position IP Finance and Monetisation Conference, Krakow, 6-7 September 2012 Richard Vary Head of Litigation, Nokia 1 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

2 2 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

3 Where in practice do we see patent cases filed? 3 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

4 Where do patent cases go to trial 4 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

5 The UK High Court London 5 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

6 What differences do we see in the UK system? Declaratory relief Quick but rigorous trial Discovery experts Amendments must be made in good time Costs awards: typically winner recovers 60-80% of actual cost 6 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

7 The squeeze 7 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia UK court hears validity and infringement/essentiality together

8 Italy Tribunale di Milano 8 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

9 The Netherlands District Court of the Hague Fast procedure, but speed comes with certain costs: can’t easily amend, or evolve your case Strict time limits for evidence Infringement/validity heard together High reputation of judges Cross border reach 9 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

10 France 10 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

11 How does it work in Germany? Race to a remedy: get injunction before patent invalidated argue for broad construction before regional court, narrow on invalidity 11 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

12 Dusseldorf 12 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

13 Landgericht Mannheim 13 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

14 Bundespatentgericht 14 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

15 Result: If you haven’t been injuncted in Germany by now, you should probably be a little offended PartiesCourtDate of DecisionDecision Apple./. MotorolaRegional Court Munich I01 March 2012Injunction against Motorola Apple./. MotorolaRegional Court Munich I16 February 2012Injunction against Motorola Motorola./. AppleRegional Court Mannheim3 February 2012Injunction against Apple Apple./. SamsungRegional Court Munich I01 February 2012 Injunction against Samsung HTC./. IPComRegional Court Düsseldorf19 December 2011 Injunction against IPCom (misleading warning letters) Motorola Mobility./. Apple Regional Court Mannheim09 December 2011Injunction against Apple Motorola Mobility./. Apple Regional Court Mannheim04 November 2011Injunction against Apple IPCom/NokiaRegional Court Mannheim8 February 2011Injunction against Nokia IPCom/HTCRegional Court MannheimFebruary 2009Injunction against HTC

16 Map of interactions 16 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia German infringement court UK court Federal Patent Court Italian Civil Court Italian Prosecutors French court Dutch court

17 Imagine you are a CEO Where would you locate your factories, your warehouses, your distribution centres?

18 Unified Patent Court Local or regional divisions hear infringement Revocation may be local, or referred to the Central Division Injunctions are pan European 18 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

19 The vicious circle of bifurcation Increase need to reach cross licence with non-EU competitors Pay higher royalties to non-EU competitors Reduced cash available for R&D in Europe Fewer EP patents than non-EU competitors Increased risk of business disrupting injunction compared to non-EU based competitors

20 Result Ultimately EU-based hi-tech business less able to compete with non-EU competitors, as they will become net payers of royalties International companies: relocate factories/distribution hubs to Asia/US Domestic companies: don’t grow as fast, or fail  Fewer jobs/less investment in Europe

21 Bifurcation: bad for business European ^ But really rather good for our competitors!


Download ppt "Workshop: Protecting market position IP Finance and Monetisation Conference, Krakow, 6-7 September 2012 Richard Vary Head of Litigation, Nokia 1 Personal."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google