Download presentation
Published byNoah Sember Modified over 10 years ago
1
Evaluation of HARMONIE using a single column model in the KNMI
Parameterization Testbed Cisco de Bruijn and Wim de Rooy Thanks to Roel Neggers
2
Content Introduction: KNMI Parameterization Testbed (KPT)
HARMONIE (mesoscale model 2.5 km) Cases: Improved massflux profile in cloud layer Improved fog forecast Windprofile stable boundary layer Conclusions Outlook EMS Berlin sept 2011
3
KPT EMS Berlin sept 2011
4
KPT Dynamical tendencies prescribed Fast physical processes
Relaxation to driving model Framework for quick experiments Driving Model SCM LS subsidence 1) Statistically identify a problem in a GCM Long-term GCM statistics guide the evaluation effort 2) Assess if the problem is reproduced by the corresponding SCM Exactly matching the GCM statistics (monthly/yearly means) 3) If so, identify which individual days contribute most to the error Selected individual cases are guaranteed to matter 4) Study those days in great detail, using a variety of tools Additional LES simulations 5) When the cause is identified and understood, formulate a solution 6) Re-simulate and re-evaluate the modified SCM 7) Rerun the GCM including the improved physics LES Horizontal advection supersite EMS Berlin sept 2011
5
KPT Cabauw observations EMS Berlin sept 2011
6
HARMONIE=ALADIN + HIRLAM
EMS Berlin sept 2011 6 6
7
HARMONIE AROME/HARMONIE physics Radiation. Convection/Turbulence.
Microphysics of warm clouds. Microphysics for atmospheric ice. Sub-grid condensation (Cloud scheme). Surface processes (SURFEX package). EMS Berlin sept 2011
8
HARMONIE Eddy Diffussivity Mass Flux (Siebesma et al. 2007) zinv
EMS Berlin sept 2011
9
HARMONIE Convection scheme, differences EDKF (Pergaud et al, 2009)
One updraft Lateral entrainment/detrainment (Kain Fritsch, 1990) EDMF Two updrafts (Neggers et al, 2008) Lateral entrainment/detrainment (De Rooy and Siebesma, 2008) EMS Berlin sept 2011
10
Improved Mass flux profile in the cloud layer
EDKF EDMF In EDKF updraft stops too early due to lack of heat coagulation. Moisture was trapped in a too shallow layer. EMS Berlin sept 2011
11
Improved Mass flux profile in the cloud layer
EDMF LES EDKF EMS Berlin sept 2011
12
Improved Mass flux profile in the cloud layer
EDMF LES EDKF Mass flux [m/s] EMS Berlin sept 2011
13
Improved Fog forecast EDKF EDMF Observations, visibility
EMS Berlin sept 2011
14
Improved Fog forecast 3D HARMONIE, two successive runs
EDMF with modified cloud scheme Analysis time:14 Feb 12 UTC Analysis time:15 Feb 00 UTC EMS Berlin sept 2011
15
Windprofile stable ABL
EDKF EDMF WRF TEMF OBS EMS Berlin sept 2011
16
Windprofile stable ABL
EDKF EDMF WRF TEMF 3D RACMO 3D HARMONIE OBS EMS Berlin sept 2011
17
Dynamical tendencies have to be accurate SCM and KPT are useful tools
Conclusions Dynamical tendencies have to be accurate SCM and KPT are useful tools Model has been improved (bug fixes) New parameterizations have been succesfully tested EMS Berlin sept 2011
18
Need for accurate tendencies (mesoscale) for the SCM from HARMONIE
Outlook Need for accurate tendencies (mesoscale) for the SCM from HARMONIE 1D/3D model should have the same software cycle Emphasis on other parameterizations like radiation, aerosols and soil physics EMS Berlin sept 2011
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.