1. WLTP Phase 1b Organization WLTP Informal Group Chair : S. Redmann Vice Chair : K. KOBAYASHI co-TSs : K. Kolesa / N. ICHIKAWA Drafting Coordinator : from EU Submitted by the WLTP SecretaryWorking paper No. WLTP-05-03e (WLTP IG meeting, Jan. 8th, 2014) E-Lab. Sub-group co-Chairs : Ohlund / Niikuni TS : N. ICHIKAWA Task Forces IG designates responsible CPs/Individual for each task. Shall be flexible for practical and effective work depend on case by case basis.

2. Tasks of WLTP Informal Group / E-Lab. Sub-group / Task Force - 1 IGE-Lab. SGTask Forces Coordination of working structure including overlapping issues. Supervision/Monitoring of SG, TFs, gtr drafting and Round Robin Designate responsible CPs/Individual for each task (see WLTP-05-04) Organization of IG f2f meetings & tel/web conferences Chairs/TS arrange f2f meetings, tel/web conferences, email exchanges (whatever appropriate) Responsible CPs/Individual arrange f2f meetings, tel/web conferences, email exchanges, if necessary (whatever appropriate) Work on open issues Discussion on the proposals from TFs, then decisions on next actions. Gives guidance and/or ask related members to make a compromised solution when needed Develop proposal and provide it for IG discussion

3. Tasks of WLTP Informal Group / E-Lab. Sub-group / Task Force - 2 IGE-Lab. SGTask Forces Confirmation of conclusions from SG, then decisions on next actions. Gives guidance and/or ask related members to make a compromised solution when needed Develop draft conclusion and provide it for IG confirmation. Providing documents on UN WLTP Website Providing documents on CircaBC (linked on UNECE webside) Ensuring transparency of major decisions by involvement of CPs & relevant stakeholders Clear positions on issues to be decided on GRPE level Progress report to GRPE Development of gtrSupport of DC in drafting process Development of Phase2 ToR

4. Aim of Subgroup / Task Forces structure: E-Lab. SGTask Forces Continue to possess E-Lab. SG for its continuity from Phase1a and for its technical uniqueness Direct proposals from individual experts to IG shall be avoided. TF shall ensure pre-discussion of proposal with relevant experts. Only if suitable, designated CPs / experts might be task to deliver proposals for discussion directly to the IG. SG structure shall ensure pre-discussion with the relevant experts and allow the development of draft conclusions. TF shall consider the comments/input during Phase1a and develop proposals. This should enhance quality and speed in developing the gtr. TF shall have an unbureaucratic structure with a coordinator or designated CP/expert who is the contact person for the IG leaders. Only the relevant experts shall be involved. Involvement of all other stakeholders will be ensured at latest on IG level.

5. STEP IGE-Lab. SGTask Forces 1 Designates responsible CPs/Individual for each working item. 2 Only if suitable, individual CPs / experts might be task to deliver proposals directly to the IG. Develop a draft conclusion by a certain deadline * Develop proposal by a certain deadline * 3 Confirm the conclusion from SG. If a decision can’t be taken yet, (a) gives guidance to SG or (b) ask related members to make a compromised solution Discuss the proposal and makes a decision for approval. If a decision can’t be reached, (a) gives guidance to TF or (b) ask related members to make a compromised solution WLTP Phase 1b Job Flow -1 *) Deadlines in advance of a WLTP IG meeting: (1)Appr. 2 weeks: status report on each working item by SG/TF at preparation telweb conf. of WLTP IG (2)Latest 1 week: Upload of the working document to UN website by IG See initial proposals for responsibilities: WLTP-05-04

6. STEP IGE-Lab. SGTask Forces 4 Ask the Drafting Coordinator … … to transpose the decision to the gtr draft or … to develop a gtr draft wording based on the IG decision (DC to be assisted by the assigned experts) Support gtr development 5 Reviews the gtr draft Crosscheck of drafted wording (at least by IG leaders) before the informal / working document will be sent to GRPE WLTP Phase 1b Job Flow -1

7. Highest Priority: OIT Phase 1B Reserved Parts Correcting of wrong formulas, references etc. Drafting Middle Priority: Clarifications of text New amendment proposals Low Priority: Supplemental features (e.g. alternative ref. fuels,…) WLTP Phase 1b Working Priorities

8. WLTP Phase 1b Rough Schedule WP.29 GRPE WLTP 2014 2015 2016 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fix organization, responsibilities and time schedule Phase2 ToR 56789 10 gtr informal document Round Robin 167 168 169 717370726968 gtr formal document Slight modification 11 12 13 Phase2 14