1. Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Individual Behavior, Personality, and Values Chapter Two

2. 2-2 MARS Model of Individual Behavior Individual behavior and results SituationalfactorsSituationalfactors Values Personality Perceptions Emotions Attitudes Stress Values Personality Perceptions Emotions Attitudes Stress Role perceptions MotivationMotivation AbilityAbility

3. 2-3 Employee Motivation Internal forces that affect a person’s voluntary choice of behavior  direction  intensity  persistence RR BARBAR SS MM AA

4. 2-4 Employee Ability Natural aptitudes and learned capabilities required to successfully complete a task Competencies  personal characteristics that lead to superior performance Person  job matching  selecting  developing  redesigning RR BARBAR SS MM AA

5. 2-5 Employee Role Perceptions Beliefs about what behavior is required to achieve the desired results:  understanding what tasks to perform  understanding relative importance of tasks  understanding preferred behaviors to accomplish tasks RR BARBAR SS MM AA

6. 2-6 Situational Factors Environmental conditions beyond the individual’s short-term control that constrain or facilitate behavior  time  people  budget  work facilities RR BARBAR SS MM AA

7. 2-7 Defining Personality Relatively enduring pattern of thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that characterize a person, along with the psychological processes behind those characteristics  Behavior patterns reflect underlying stable traits  Some variability, adjust to suit the situation

8. 2-8 Nature vs Nurture of Personality Heredity explains about 50 percent of behavioral tendencies and 30 percent of temperament preferences Minnesota studies of twins, including those separated at birth, very similar behavior patterns But nurture also counts -- socialization, life experiences, learning Personality stabilizes over time  executive function uses our self-concept to guide behavior

9. 2-9 Big Five Personality Dimensions (CANOE) Outgoing, talkative Sensitive, flexible Careful, dependable Courteous, caring Anxious, hostile ConscientiousnessConscientiousness AgreeablenessAgreeableness NeuroticismNeuroticism Openness to Experience ExtroversionExtroversion

10. 2-10 Personality & Performance Conscientiousness and emotional stability  Motivational components of personality  Strongest personality predictors of performance Extroversion  Linked to sales and mgt performance  Related to social interaction and persuasion Agreeableness  Better performance in jobs requiring cooperation and helpfulness Openness to experience  Linked to higher creativity and adaptability to change

11. Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Self-concept: the “I” in Organizational Behavior Individual Behavior, Personality, and Values Yasmeen Youssef Fairmont Hotels & Resorts

12. 2-12 Fairmont’s Success Begins with Self-Concept Yasmeen Youssef (shown in photo) received a huge boost in her self- esteem and self-concept when she joined Fairmont Hotels & Resorts soon moving from Egypt to Canada. “I was worried no one would take a chance on me, would believe in me,” Youssef recalls. “Everything changed when I started working at Fairmont.” Yasmeen Youssef Fairmont Hotels & Resorts

13. 2-13 Self-Concept Defined An individual’s self-beliefs and self-evaluations  It is the “Who am I?” and “How do I feel about myself?” that people ask themselves and that guide their decisions and actions. Includes self-enhancement, self-verification, and self-evaluation

14. 2-14 Three “C’s” of Self-Concept Complexity  People have multiple self-concepts Consistency  Improved wellbeing when multiple self-concepts call for similar personality traits and values Clarity  Self-concepts are clearly and confidently described, internally consistent, and stable across time.  Self-concept clarity requires self-concept consistency

15. 2-15 Three “Selves” of Self-Concept Self-enhancement  Promoting and protecting our positive self-view Self-verification  Affirming our existing self-concept (good and bad elements) Self-evaluation  Evaluating ourselves through self-esteem, self-efficacy, and locus of control

16. 2-16 Self-Concept: Self-Enhancement An innate human drive to promote and protect a positive self-view of being competent, attractive, lucky, ethical, valued Most evident in situations that are common and are important to us People with a positive self-concept have better personal adjustment and mental/physical health tend to inflate personal causation and probability of success

17. 2-17 Self-Concept: Self-Verification Motivation to verify and maintain our existing self- concept Stabilizes our self-concept -- anchors our thoughts and actions People prefer feedback that is consistent with their self-concept Effects of self-verification We ignore or reject info inconsistent with self-concept We interact more with those who affirm/reflect self- concept

18. 2-18 Self-Concept: Self-Evaluation Self-evaluation defined mainly by self-esteem, self-efficacy, and locus of control Self-esteem  Global self-evaluation  High self-esteem -- less influenced, more persistent, more logical Self-efficacy  Belief in one’s ability, motivation, role perceptions, and situation to complete a task successfully (i.e. MARS analysis)  General vs task-specific self-efficacy Locus of control  General belief about the amount of personal control over life events  Higher self-evaluation with internal locus of control

19. 2-19 The Social Self Personal identity -- defining ourselves in terms of things that make us unique in a situation Social identity -- defining ourselves in terms of groups to which we belong or have an emotional attachment We identify with groups that have high status -- aids self-enhancement Employees at other firms People living in other countries Graduates of other schools An individual’s social identity Cisco Systems Employee Live in the United States University of Denver Graduate Contrasting Groups

20. Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Values in the Workplace Individual Behavior, Personality, and Values

21. 2-21 Values in the Workplace Stable, evaluative beliefs that guide our preferences Define right or wrong, good or bad Value system -- hierarchy of values Espoused vs. enacted values:  Espoused -- the values we say and often think we use  Enacted -- values we actually rely on to guide our decisions and actions

22. 2-22 Schwartz’s Values Model Openness to change Self- enhancement Self- transcendence Conservation

23. 2-23 Schwartz’s Values Model Openness to change -- extent to which a person is motivated to pursue innovative ways Conservation -- the extent to which a person is motivated to preserve the status quo Self-enhancement -- how much a person is motivated by self-interest Self-transcendence -- the motivation to promote the welfare of others and nature Self- enhancement Openness to change Self- transcendence Conservation

24. 2-24 Values and Behavior Habitual behavior usually consistent with values, but conscious behavior less so because values are abstract constructs Decisions and behaviors linked to values when:  Mindful of our values  Have logical reasons to apply values in that situation  Situation does not interfere

25. 2-25 Values Congruence Values congruence -- where two or more entities have similar value systems Problems with incongruence  Incompatible decisions  Lower satisfaction and commitment  Increased stress and turnover Benefits of (some) incongruence  Better decision making (diverse values)

26. 2-26 Individualism The degree that people value independence and personal uniqueness Denmark Taiwan Italy High Individualism U.S. Low Individualism India

27. 2-27 Collectivism The degree that people value their duty to groups to which they belong and to group harmony India U.S. Taiwan High Collectivism Italy Low Collectivism Denmark

28. 2-28 Power Distance The degree that people accept an unequal distribution of power in society Japan Israel Denmark Venezuela High Power Distance Malaysia Low Power Distance U.S.

29. 2-29 Uncertainty Avoidance High U. A. Low U. A. Japan Greece U.S. The degree that people tolerate ambiguity (low) or feel threatened by ambiguity and uncertainty (high uncertainty avoidance). Italy Singapore

30. 2-30 Achievement-Nurturing Achievement Nurturing Japan U.S. U.S. Sweden Sweden The degree that people value assertiveness, competitiveness, and materialism (achievement) versus relationships and well-being of others (nurturing) China Chile France

31. 2-31 Utilitarianism Individual Rights Greatest good for the greatest number of people Fundamental entitlements in society Distributive Justice People who are similar should receive similar benefits Three Ethical Principles

32. 2-32 Influences on Ethical Conduct Moral intensity  degree that issue demands ethical principles Ethical sensitivity  ability to recognize the presence and determine the relative importance of an ethical issue Situational influences  competitive pressures and other conditions affect ethical behavior

33. 2-33 Supporting Ethics at Coors Long before it was a priority at other firms, Coors Brewing Company developed training programs and reward systems that explicitly strengthen ethical conduct.

34. 2-34 Supporting Ethical Behavior Ethical code of conduct Ethics training Ethics officers Ethical leadership and culture

35. Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Individual Behavior, Personality, and Values Chapter Two