Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRyan Eckersley Modified over 9 years ago
1
MIECHV Program: Performance Measurement November 27, 2012
Carlos Cano, MD, MPM Division of Home Visiting and Early Childhood Services Maternal and Child Health Bureau
2
Overview Legislatively Required Performance Measurement System
Federal Data Collection Opportunities
3
Affordable Care Act MIECHV program: Section 2951 of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (P.L ) Amends Title V of the Social Security Act to add the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program under Section 511 ACF and HRSA collaboration $1.5 billion over 5 years
4
Priority Populations Families in at-risk communities
Low-income families Pregnant women under age 21 Families with a history of child abuse or neglect Families with a history of substance abuse Families with a history of tobacco use Families with children with low student achievement Families with children w/ developmental delays Families w/ individuals who served in Armed Forces
5
Evidence-based Home Visiting Models
1. Child First 2. Early Head Start-Home Visiting 3. Public Health Nursing Early Intervention Program for Adolescent Mothers (EIP) 4. Early Start (NZ) 5. Family Check-Up 6. Healthy Families America (HFA) 7. Healthy Steps 8. Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) 9. Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) 10. Oklahoma CBFRS 11. Parents as Teachers (PAT) 12. PALS Infant 13. Safecare Augmented
6
Data Collection on Six Goals (Benchmark Areas)
Maternal and newborn health (8 constructs) Child injuries; child abuse, neglect, or maltreatment; emergency department visits (7) School readiness and achievement (9) Crime (2) or domestic violence (3) Family economic self-sufficiency (3) Coordination/referrals to community resources (5)
7
Grantee Measurement System: Development
Legislation: Three-year measurement cycle Report to Congress due December, 2015 Distinct from research/evaluation (MIHOPE) TA and Federal feedback during review of plans Refinement of benchmark indicators Federal-State Partnership Develop a robust measurement system Balancing two values: accountability and improvement Data reporting for first implementation year: Fall of 2012
8
Indicator Development: Roadmap
Name of the performance measure Process or outcome Operational definition key terms specified; participants included and excluded from the calculation; type of scoring: if percent, numerator/denominator Measurement tool utilized or question(s) posed Definition of improvement Before and after comparisons (e.g., performance in year 1 vs. year 3) Data collection plan Persons responsible; source of data (e.g., self-report or administrative data); frequency of collection.
9
Overview Legislatively Required Measurement System
Federal Data Collection Opportunities
10
Federal Collection System: Prerequisites
Select an electronic collection system Select already existing applicable forms Develop new MIECHV-specific forms Obtain approval from OMB under PRA Specify system requirements for new forms Inform grantees on the use of the electronic system
11
Discretionary Grants Information System (DGIS)
A web-based system Over 900 MCHB-funded grantees report data online Areas (Forms 1,2,4, 6, pubs and prods) Budget/Financial Programmatic
12
Interagency Data Work Group
Selected 5 DGIS forms Developed 2 new HV forms for unique MIECHV data needs HV form 1: Socio-demographic data and service utilization HV form 2: Grantee-selected performance measures Modified DGIS contract to include collection and analysis capabilities for MIECHV Specified DGIS requirements for new forms Conducted webinars for grantees Obtained OMB approval
13
Accessing DGIS-HV Screenshot of Main Menu
14
Overview Legislatively Required Measurement System
Federal Data Collection Opportunities
15
MIECHV Measurement: Opportunities
Research (MIHOPE) Advance the knowledge in HV the maternal and early childhood heath and development field Improvement (Benchmark area-related data) Data can drive quality improvement efforts Common data framework: catalyst for collaboration & partnerships common agenda system integration Across home visiting programs in a geographic area Other early childhood programs (child care and education) Medical homes
16
Flexibility for Grantees
Select performance measures: process or outcome Select measurement tools Define improvement (targets not required) Design data collection plan Improvement shown for a fraction of constructs
17
Next Phase: Quality Improvement
Pivoting from measurement towards QI Individualized TA Regional meetings Plan to establish a learning collaborative Enlisting grantees Selecting 4-6 areas of improvement Preliminary development of a shared sub-set of indicators
18
Resources and Contact Information HRSA/MCHB website: HomVEE website: Monique Fountain Hanna, MD, MBA, Project Officer for Region III Office: (215) Carlos Cano, MD, MPM, Senior Medical Advisor, Office: (301)
19
Thank you
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.