Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEmiliano Winstanley Modified over 9 years ago
1
Brussels, 12 may 2011 Parliaments on the net IX Javier de Andrés, Head of IT Department Miguel Ángel Gonzalo, Webmaster Survey on the use of microblogs - Twitter- in the Spanish Congress
2
Parliaments on the net IX | Página 2 Agenda 01 Presentation of the survey 02 Quantitative figures 03 Qualitative figures 04 Findings Direct communication between citizens and MPs through microblogging. Approach to the use of Twitter by MPs as a way of information and interaction
3
Parliaments on the net IX | Página 3 Presentation of the survey It’s presented a preliminary advance of results of the ongoing research which aims to know the use that the 40 MPs in the House, who had already signed in Twitter in April 2011, were given to this tool. The survey deals with several questions as: What percentage of MPs have a twitter profile in comparison with the number of MPs using other tools (personal webs, blogs or Facebook)? Do MPs have a personal profile on Twitter or is it just a tool administered collectively by the parliamentary group? What sort of information is offered by the MPs through their Twitter profile (political, parliamentary activity, personal, …)?
4
| Página 4 Presentation of the survey How often do they update their profile? Is this tool used by the MPs to interact with others users or exclusively to publish information? Ultimately, it’s tried to offer a description of the state of the art whether Twitter contributes to promote direct contact between MPs and citizens through the internet.
5
| Página 5 Survey methodology The survey is based on descriptive content analysis with quantitative and semi-qualitative results. The survey takes as starting point some previous surveys (Campos, 2009; Dader y Campos, 2006; Ramos-Vielba y Gonzalo, 2000 a,b and 2001). Only for the analysis of contents, the survey takes into consideration the 50 latest tweets. It aims to investigate this new tool in order to decide whether it can be considered as a tool for debating between MPs and citizens or only as a tool for information. The global survey will be carried out jointly with Ms Eva Campos, professor at the University of Valladolid
6
| Página 6 Quantitative figures Presence of the Congress of Deputies in the web 2.0 32% online in social networks
7
| Página 7 Quantitative figures. Presence of the Congress of Deputies in the web 2.0: distribution of parliamentary groups
8
| Página 8 Quantitative figures. Presence of the Congress of Deputies in the web 2.0: distribution of the social networks
9
| Página 9 Quantitative figures. Presence of the Congress of Deputies in Twitter: global data per parliamentary groups
10
| Página 10 Quantitative figures. Temporal data Year of the first Tweet
11
| Página 13 Quantitative figures. MPs: Average of Monthly tweets Average of total Tweets:
12
| Página 12 Quantitative figures. Popularity
13
| Página 13 Quantitative figures. Interactivity
14
| Página 11 Qualitative figures. Content of the tweets
15
| Página 17 Findings: Principal uses of Twitter shown in the survey Emission of political messages Sharing personal agenda Answering questions to citizens Personal uses Uploading pictures
16
| Página 18 Findings: Parliament 2.0: some principles 1. Parliament 2.0 = Proximity 2.0 2. Contents are provided by users 3. Web 2.0 widen the spaces for participation and communication. It makes them accessible for every person on the net 4. The focus is: attitude of proximity towards the citizenship and a change of philosophy and way of understanding the representation 5. Transparency in the parliamentary activity
17
| Página 19 Findings: Parliament 2.0. some principles 6.Active participation in order not to move it a disguised 1.5 parliament. 7.Technologies being harmless 8.Social network is not just a trend 9.Social network is not only for young people (the number of people older than 55 using it is increasing) 10.Start today
18
| Página 20 Findings: Challenges and difficulties It is a must to adjust the collective project to the individual age 50% of the offline people can’t be an excuse to slow down changes The public space has change. It requires political adaptations Changes are hard processes
19
| Página 21 Conclusion The principal findings of the survey show that: MPs mainly use their Twitter account at an individual level Fundamentally, they use it to publish political information, and in lesser, the information of their parliamentary activities. As for the interaction with the citizens, comments publicly exchanged with other users, generally related to their political ideology, show an incipient, although still low, level of deliberation and discussion.
20
| Página 21 Bibliography Campos, Eva - La comunicación directa entre los diputados del Congreso y los ciudadanos a través del correo electrónico. Nuevos hábitos de información y participación ciudadana en la VIII Legislatura de las Cortes Generales (2004-2008).- En: Doxa Comunicación: revista interdisciplinar de estudios de comunicación y ciencias sociales, Nº. 11, 2010, págs. 55-75 - Información e interacción en las sedes virtuales de los parlamentos españoles (2004-2008).- En: Textual & Visual Media: revista de la Sociedad Española de Periodística, ISSN 1889-2515, Nº. 3, 2010, págs. 43-62 Dader, Jose Luis Internet parlamentario en España (1999-2005)/ José Luis Dader García, Eva Campos.- en: Zer: Revista de estudios de comunicación = Komunikazio ikasketen aldizkaria, Nº. 20, 2006, 132 págs. Ramos Vielba, Irene La documentación parlamentaria en Internet : el caso de la página web del Congreso de los Diputados / Irene Ramos Vielba, Miguel Ángel Gonzalo. En: Revista de las Cortes Generales. -- N. 50 (2.º cuatrim. 2000). -- p. 305-327
21
| Página 21 ¡ Thank you very much ! Javier de Andres, Head of It Deparment javier.andres@congreso.es Miguel Angel Gonzalo, Webmaster miguel.gonzalo@congreso.es
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.