Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 Halo Formation and Emittance Growth of Positron Beams in Long, Dense Plasmas Patric Muggli and the E-162 Collaboration:

Published byRoberto Trant Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 Halo Formation and Emittance Growth of Positron Beams in Long, Dense Plasmas Patric Muggli and the E-162 Collaboration:"— Presentation transcript:

1 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 Halo Formation and Emittance Growth of Positron Beams in Long, Dense Plasmas Patric Muggli and the E-162 Collaboration: C.D. Barnes, F.-J. Decker, M. J. Hogan, R. Iverson, C. O’Connell, P. Raimondi, R.H. Siemann, D. Walz Stanford Linear Accelerator Center B. Blue, C. E. Clayton, C. Huang, C. Joshi, K. A. Marsh, W. B. Mori, M. Zhou University of California, Los Angeles T. Katsouleas, S. Lee, P. Muggli University of Southern California

2 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 Optical Transition Radiation (OTR) CHERENKOV (aerogel) - Spatial resolution ≈100 µm - Energy resolution ≈30 MeV - Time resolution: ≈1 ps y x y x E XPERIMENTAL S ET U P E-157: y,E x x E-162: - 1:1 imaging, spatial resolution <9 µm e -, e + N=2  10 10  z =0.7 mm E=28.5 GeV Ionizing Laser Pulse (193 nm) Li Plasma n e ≈2  10 14 cm -3 L≈1.4 m Cherenkov Radiator Streak Camera (1ps resolution) Bending Magnet X-Ray Diagnostic Optical Transition Radiators Dump ∫Cdt Quadrupoles Imaging Spectrometer 25 m IP0: IP2:

3 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 e - : n e0 =2  10 14 cm -3, c/  p =375 µme + : n e0 =2  10 12 cm -3, c/  p =3750 µm  r =35 µm  r =700 µm Uniform focusing force (r,z)  =1.8  10 10 Non-uniform focusing force (r,z) d=2 mm Blow Out 3   beam Front Back 3  0 beam Front Back 3-D QuickPIC simulations, plasma e - density: e - & e + B EAM N EUTRALIZATION e-e- e+e+

4 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 e - & e + F OCUSING F IELDS* E x (GV/m) 0 1500 -1500 0-37503750 x (µm) z (µm) e-e- E x (GV/m) 0 700 -700 0-37503750 x (µm) z (µm) e+e+ e-e- e+e+  x0 =  y0 =25 µm  z =730 µm N=1.9  10 10 e + /e - n e =1.5  10 14 cm -3 *QuickPIC Linear, no abberations Non-linear, abberations

5 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 e - & e + F OCUSING F IELDS r=  r r=3  r r=  r r=3  r QuickPIC  x0 ≈  y0 ≈25 µm,  Nx ≈390  10 -6,  Ny ≈80  10 -6 m-rad, N=1.9  10 10 e +,  z ≈730 µm, n e =1.5  10 -6, L≈1.1 cm Uniform focusing force (r,z) Non-uniform focusing force (r,z) Weaker focusing force Stronger focusing force FrontBackFrontBack e + : focusing fields vary along r and z!

6 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 F OCUSING OF e - / e + e-e- e+e+ n e =0n e ≈10 14 cm -3 2mm Ideal Plasma Lens in Blow-Out Regime Plasma Lens with Aberrations OTR images ≈1m from plasma exit (  x ≠  y ) Qualitative differences

7 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 E XPERIMENT / S IMULATIONS  x0 =  y0 =25µm,  Nx =390  10 -6,  Ny =80  10 -6 m-rad, N=1.9  10 10 e +, L=1.4 m Downstream OTR Excellent experimental/simulation results agreement! Simulation Experiment UV Energy (mJ)

8 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 Downstream OTR Defocusing in x and y “low”  in both planes, larger  No distinctive features (  -tron oscillations) Excellent experimental/simulation results agreement!  x0 ≈65  y0 ≈48 µm,  Nx ≈115  10 -6,  Ny ≈184  10 -6 m-rad, N≈1.9  10 10 e +, L≈1.4 m E XPERIMENTAL/SIMULATION R ESULTS ExperimentSimulation UV Energy (mJ)

9 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 y,E x E XPERIMENTAL R ESULTS e +  x0 ≈  y0 ≈25 µm,  Nx ≈390  10 -6,  Ny ≈80  10 -6 m-rad, N=1.9  10 10 e +, L≈1.4 m Cherenkov/Plasma Exit UV Energy (mJ) Strong focusing in x (large  ), defocusing in y (low  ) No distinctive features (  -tron oscillations) Resolution Limit?

10 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 Beam Size=FWHM (BAB’) Charge in the Peak=Area(BAB’) Charge in the Halo=2*Area(CDB) F IT FOR B EAMS WITH H ALO X-profile y-profile Halo

11 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 H ALO F ORMATION  x0 ≈  y0 ≈25 µm,  Nx ≈390  10 -6,  Ny ≈80  10 -6 m-rad, N=1.9  10 10 e +, L≈1.4 m Charge is conserved by the triangular fits The halo forms at low density

12 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 H ALO F ORMATION  x0 ≈  y0 ≈25 µm,  Nx ≈390  10 -6,  Ny ≈80  10 -6 m-rad, N=1.9  10 10 e +, L≈1.4 m Very nice agreement ExperimentSimulation

13 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 0.93 mJ 0.01 mJ (OFF) 1mm OFF n e =2  10 14 cm -3 H ALO F ORMATION  x0 ≈  y0 ≈25 µm,  Nx ≈390  10 -6,  Ny ≈80  10 -6 m-rad, N=1.9  10 10 e +, L≈1.4 m Experiment Simulation Very similar

14 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 B EAM/ F IELD E VOLUTION Radius (cell)  x0 =  y0 =25µm,  Nx =390  10 -6,  Ny =80  10 -6 m-rad, N=1.9  10 10 Beam becomes non-Gaussian Beam size and focusing field “stop” at z≈0.7 m

15 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 e - / e + : S LICES S IZE IN THE P LASMA Front Back e-e- e+e+  o =0.34 m, n e matched =1.6  10 13 cm --3 Head diverges ≈  0 Coherent betatron motion of the core Phase mixing of the following slices

16 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 e - / e + : S LICE E MITTANCE Front Back e-e- e+e+ Increase in the head... Blow-out, pure ion column preserves beam emittance Phase mixing of the following slices

17 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 C ONCLUSIONS Simulation results show emittance growth, mostly in the front and back of the bunch Simulation results confirm the experimental observations Simulation results show “hosing” in the back of the bunch Focusing of e + by a plasma is qualitatively different from that of e - : Positron bunches are focused without showing betatron oscillations … … focusing depends on  and  at plasma entrance… … show formation of a beam halo. Focusing force is nonlinear in r and z Emittance growth is expected

18 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 0.13 mJ 0.23 mJ 0.93 mJ 6.47 mJ 0.01 mJ (OFF) 1mm E XPERIMENTAL P ROFILES @ OTR y x  x0 =  y0 =25µm,  Nx =390  10 -6,  Ny =80  10 -6 m-rad, N=1.9  10 10, n e =0.75  10 14 cm -3 Focusing in x, not in y, n e “independent” No halo at low n e Triangular projected beam profiles (n e ≠0)

19 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 S IMULATION P ROFILES  x0 =  y0 =25µm,  Nx =390  10 -6,  Ny =80  10 -6 m-rad, N=1.9  10 10 Beam halo, as in experiment Focusing in x @ DS OTR n e =0.75  10 14 cm -3 @ Plasma Exit/Cherenkov@ DS OTR n e =0 Triangular projected beam profiles (n e ≠0)

20 U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 F OCUSING OF e + : H IGH n e from OTR images ≈1m from plasma exit Focusing limited by emittance growth due to plasma focusing aberrations? M.J. Hogan et al., PRL (2003). x-size reduction >3, no betatron oscillations  0x =  0y =25 µm N=1.9  10 10 e +  xN ≈10  yN ≈10  10 -5 m-rad L=1.4 m

Download ppt "U C L A P. Muggli, Paris 2005, 06/09/05 Halo Formation and Emittance Growth of Positron Beams in Long, Dense Plasmas Patric Muggli and the E-162 Collaboration:"

Similar presentations

Patrick Krejcik May 3-6, 2004 Patrick Krejcik R. Akre, P. Emma, M. Hogan, (SLAC), H. Schlarb, R. Ischebeck (DESY), P. Muggli.

Patrick Krejcik May 3-6, 2004 Patrick Krejcik R. Akre, P. Emma, M. Hogan, (SLAC), H. Schlarb, R. Ischebeck (DESY), P. Muggli.
Chengkun Huang UCLA Quasi-static modeling of beam/laser plasma interactions for particle acceleration Zhejiang University 07/14/2009.

Chengkun Huang UCLA Quasi-static modeling of beam/laser plasma interactions for particle acceleration Zhejiang University 07/14/2009.
Plasma Wakefield Accelerator

Plasma Wakefield Accelerator
Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators

Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators
Design and Experimental Considerations for Multi-stage Laser Driven Particle Accelerator at 1μm Driving Wavelength Y.Y. Lin( 林元堯）, A.C. Chiang （蔣安忠）, Y.C.

Design and Experimental Considerations for Multi-stage Laser Driven Particle Accelerator at 1μm Driving Wavelength Y.Y. Lin( 林元堯）, A.C. Chiang （蔣安忠）, Y.C.
CO 2 laser system M. Polyanskiy, I. Pogorelsky, M. Babzien, and V. Yakimenko.

CO 2 laser system M. Polyanskiy, I. Pogorelsky, M. Babzien, and V. Yakimenko.
Beam characteristics UCLA What is a “perfect” beam? It comes from the Injector. It is affected by many factors A few highlights from contributed talks…

Beam characteristics UCLA What is a “perfect” beam? It comes from the Injector. It is affected by many factors A few highlights from contributed talks…
Compact FEL Based on Dielectric Wakefield Acceleration J.B. Rosenzweig UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Towards a 5 th Generation Light Source Celebration.

Compact FEL Based on Dielectric Wakefield Acceleration J.B. Rosenzweig UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Towards a 5 th Generation Light Source Celebration.
Plasma wakefields in the quasi- nonlinear regime J.B. Rosenzweig a, G. Andonian a, S. Barber a, M. Ferrario b, P. Muggli c, B. O’Shea a, Y. Sakai a, A.

Plasma wakefields in the quasi- nonlinear regime J.B. Rosenzweig a, G. Andonian a, S. Barber a, M. Ferrario b, P. Muggli c, B. O’Shea a, Y. Sakai a, A.
Bunch Length Measurements in the E167 Experiment Ian Blumenfeld E167 Collaboration SLAC/UCLA/USC.

Bunch Length Measurements in the E167 Experiment Ian Blumenfeld E167 Collaboration SLAC/UCLA/USC.
Hollow Channel Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Spencer Gessner 5 th SAREC Review September 15 th, 2014.

Hollow Channel Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Spencer Gessner 5 th SAREC Review September 15 th, 2014.
Summary of R&D Status C. Joshi UCLA As Henry VIII said to Ann Boleyn “I won’t keep you for long..”

Summary of R&D Status C. Joshi UCLA As Henry VIII said to Ann Boleyn “I won’t keep you for long..”
Modeling narrow trailing beams and ion motion in PWFA Chengkun Huang (UCLA/LANL) and members of FACET collaboration SciDAC COMPASS all hands meeting 2009.

Modeling narrow trailing beams and ion motion in PWFA Chengkun Huang (UCLA/LANL) and members of FACET collaboration SciDAC COMPASS all hands meeting 2009.
Chengkun Huang | Compass meeting 2008 Chengkun Huang, I. Blumenfeld, C. E. Clayton, F.-J. Decker, M. J. Hogan, R. Ischebeck, R. Iverson, C. Joshi, T. Katsouleas,

Chengkun Huang | Compass meeting 2008 Chengkun Huang, I. Blumenfeld, C. E. Clayton, F.-J. Decker, M. J. Hogan, R. Ischebeck, R. Iverson, C. Joshi, T. Katsouleas,
Wakefield Acceleration in Dielectric Structures J.B. Rosenzweig UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy FACET Workshop SLAC, March 18, 2010 J.B. Rosenzweig.

Wakefield Acceleration in Dielectric Structures J.B. Rosenzweig UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy FACET Workshop SLAC, March 18, 2010 J.B. Rosenzweig.
LCLS undulator diagnostics and commissioning workshop January 19-20, 2004 (UCLA) Zhirong Huang, SLAC 1 Linac Coherent Light Source.

LCLS undulator diagnostics and commissioning workshop January 19-20, 2004 (UCLA) Zhirong Huang, SLAC 1 Linac Coherent Light Source.
Accelerator hall of the S- DALINAC – electron energies from 2 to 130 MeV available – cw and pulsed beam operation possible – source for polarized electron.

Accelerator hall of the S- DALINAC – electron energies from 2 to 130 MeV available – cw and pulsed beam operation possible – source for polarized electron.
1 Work supported by Department of Energy contracts DE-AC02-76SF00515 (SLAC), DE-FG03-92ER40745, DE-FG03-98DP00211, DE- FG03-92ER40727, DE-AC-0376SF0098,

1 Work supported by Department of Energy contracts DE-AC02-76SF00515 (SLAC), DE-FG03-92ER40745, DE-FG03-98DP00211, DE- FG03-92ER40727, DE-AC-0376SF0098,
New Technologies for Accelerators - Advanced Accelerator Research - Bob Siemann March 19, 2003 Introduction An Incomplete Survey Plasma Waves and The Afterburner.

New Technologies for Accelerators - Advanced Accelerator Research - Bob Siemann March 19, 2003 Introduction An Incomplete Survey Plasma Waves and The Afterburner.
An overview of the advanced accelerator research at SLAC. Experiments are being conducted with the goal of exploring high gradient acceleration mechanisms.

An overview of the advanced accelerator research at SLAC. Experiments are being conducted with the goal of exploring high gradient acceleration mechanisms.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google