Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AADDC: Science and Social Studies | March 7, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview.

Published byMark Danford Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "AADDC: Science and Social Studies | March 7, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview."— Presentation transcript:

1 AADDC: Science and Social Studies | March 7, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Academic Achievement Distinction Designations

2 2 Accountability Rating Labels Accountability Rating (Campuses and Districts) Met Standard Met Alternative Standard* (assigned to charter operators and alternative education campuses (AECs) evaluated under alternative education accountability (AEA) provisions) Improvement Required Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting *AECs evaluated under AEA provisions are not eligible for distinction designations, per Texas Education Code (TEC) §39.201.

3 3 Distinction Designations 2013  Academic Achievement in:  Reading/English Language Arts (ELA)  Mathematics  Index 2: Student Progress – Top 25% 2014  Academic Achievement in:  Reading/ELA  Mathematics  Science  Social Studies  Index 2: Student Progress – Top 25%  Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps  Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness for campuses and districts Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Shaded areas are new for 2014 Campuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard are eligible for the following distinction designations.

4 4 Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting 2013 Academic Achievement - Reading/ELA and mathematics  Campuses with grades 3-12 enrollment that achieve a Met Standard rating are eligible to receive academic achievement distinction designation (AADD).  Campuses are evaluated solely on the “All Students” student group.  Elementary and middle schools in the top quartile on at least 50 percent of the above indicators receive a distinction designation for that subject area.  High schools in the top quartile on at least 33 percent of the above indicators receive a distinction designation for that subject area.

5 5 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting AADD Indicator High School Middle School Junior High ElementaryK-8K-12 Attendance rate Not Subject Specific / Applies to both subjects and all levels Greater Than Expected Student Growth ELA & Math Grade 3 Reading Performance (Level III) R/ELA Grade 4 Writing Performance (Level III) R/ELA Grade 5 Math Performance (Level III) Math Grade 7 Writing Performance (Level III) R/ELA Grade 8 Reading Performance (Level III) R/ELA Algebra I by Grade 8-Participation Math Algebra I by Grade 8–Performance (Level III) Math AP/IB and Advanced/Dual Enrollment Course Completion Participation ELA & Math AP/IB Examination Performance: ELA R/ELA AP/IB Examination Performance: Math Math SAT/ACT Participation ELA & Math SAT Performance: ELA R/ELA SAT Performance: Math Math ACT Performance: ELA R/ELA ACT Performance: Math Math Total Indicators Reading/ELA7444611 Mathematics7553510 2013 AADD Indicators by Campus Type and Subject R/ELA = indicator can be evaluated for Reading/English Language Arts only Math = indicator can be evaluated for Mathematics only ELA & Math= indicator will be evaluated for both Reading/ELA and Mathematics Not Subject Specific = indicator cannot be directly associated with either Reading/ELA or Mathematics Blank = indicator is not applicable at this campus level.

6 Mathematics Example 6 Methodology for AADD Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Step 1 Determine Campus Comparison Group Calculate campus performance on each distinction indicator for subject Algebra I by end of Grade 8 Mathematics ACT Performance Mathematics AP/IB Performance … Up to 11 indicators (depending on campus grade configuration) Campus Profile Report  Step 2 Compare performance on each indicator to campuses in Comparison Groups Top Quartile among comparison group …  Step 3 Generate a single outcome for campus by subject Campus Outcome for Subject: Percent of Measures in the Top Quartile (2 out of 4 = 50%, 3 out of 5 = 60%, or 3 out of 8= 38%)  Step 4 Identify campuses that qualify to earn Distinction Designations Statewide Evaluation of Campus Outcomes: Eligible Distinctions based on the Percent of Measures in the Top Quartile Elementary and Middle Schools: 50% or higher High Schools and K-12 campuses: 33% or higher Distinction Designation

7 7 Mathematics Example: Pflugerville HS 1.Identify a campus comparison group for Pflugerville High School based on: a. Campus type (elementary, middle, high school); b. Campus size (total student enrollment); c. Percent of economically disadvantaged students enrolled for 2012-13; d. Percent of limited English proficient students enrolled for 2012-13; and e.Percent of mobile students, as determined from 2011-12 cumulative attendance. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Resource: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/srch.html?srch=C Methodology for AADD – Step 1

8 8 2013 Campus Comparison Group PFLUGERVILLE H S (227904001) - PFLUGERVILLE ISD Campus Type: High School Sorted by District Name Campus NameDistrict Name Number of Students % ELL % Econ Disadv Mobility Rate PFLUGERVILLE H S (227904001)PFLUGERVILLE ISD2,2656.142.611.2 1 ALVIN H S (020901001)ALVIN ISD2,4002.448.615.2 2 MANVEL H S (020901002)ALVIN ISD2,3132.240.913.8 3 AUSTIN H S (227901002)AUSTIN ISD2,1513.234.613.1 4 WEST BROOK SR H S (123910008)BEAUMONT ISD2,3062.345.615.3 5 BELTON H S (014903001)BELTON ISD2,5403.539.716.0 6 BIRDVILLE H S (220902010)BIRDVILLE ISD2,0075.435.012.7 7 RICHLAND H S (220902002)BIRDVILLE ISD2,1873.837.512.1 8 BRAZOSWOOD H S (020905002)BRAZOSPORT ISD2,4281.637.914.7 9 CREEKVIEW H S (057903006)CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD1,9815.944.712.1 10 COPPERAS COVE H S (050910001)COPPERAS COVE ISD2,1720.638.515.3 11 DENTON H S (061901003)DENTON ISD1,9859.243.017.5 12 RYAN H S (061901002)DENTON ISD2,28411.047.514.7 13 SAGINAW H S (220918004)EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD1,9803.438.916.4 14 CORONADO H S (071902005)EL PASO ISD2,6607.539.913.6 15 HIGHTOWER H S (079907008)FORT BEND ISD2,2713.647.811.7 16 KEMPNER H S (079907005)FORT BEND ISD2,3085.137.08.8 17 PASCHAL H S (220905010)FORT WORTH ISD2,7203.547.610.9 18 NAAMAN FOREST H S (057909008)GARLAND ISD2,4244.448.812.0 19 SACHSE H S (057909010)GARLAND ISD2,7164.137.012.2 20 LEHMAN H S (105906005)HAYS CISD2,1376.151.615.8 21 SUMMER CREEK H S (101913014)HUMBLE ISD2,1824.246.916.5 22 BELL H S (220916001)HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD2,0763.941.514.1 23 TRINITY H S (220916002)HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD2,4043.846.014.9 24 FOSSIL RIDGE H S (220907002)KELLER ISD2,1274.636.912.6 25 LA PORTE HIGH SCHOOL (101916001)LA PORTE ISD2,1652.140.113.3 26 THE COLONY H S (061902004)LEWISVILLE ISD1,9553.936.011.8 27 LONGVIEW H S (092903001)LONGVIEW ISD1,9752.149.815.0 28 LUBBOCK H S (152901022)LUBBOCK ISD2,1182.249.616.6 29 MANSFIELD SUMMIT H S (220908002)MANSFIELD ISD2,0555.350.616.3 30 MEMORIAL H S (108906002)MCALLEN ISD2,26213.343.116.2 31 HORN H S (057914005)MESQUITE ISD2,1902.542.412.7 32 MACARTHUR H S (015910002)NORTH EAST ISD2,6402.940.515.8 33 BRENNAN H S (015915024)NORTHSIDE ISD2,0791.336.313.1 34 TAFT H S (015915007)NORTHSIDE ISD2,6181.945.115.9 35 HENDRICKSON H S (227904004)PFLUGERVILLE ISD2,4016.236.211.6 36 BERKNER H S (057916005)RICHARDSON ISD2,5726.549.616.3 37 RICHARDSON H S (057916003)RICHARDSON ISD2,5924.948.712.1 38 STONY POINT H S (246909007)ROUND ROCK ISD2,2804.742.816.4 39 ROBERT E LEE H S (212905001)TYLER ISD2,6663.546.316.0 40 WAXAHACHIE H S (070912002)WAXAHACHIE ISD1,8361.644.315.3 Comparison Group Average2,2794.342.914.2

9 9 Mathematics Example: Pflugerville HS Methodology for AADD – Step 2 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Step 1 Calculate campus performance on each distinction indicator for subject Compare performance on each indicator to campuses in Comparison Group Indicator Pflugerville HS Score Quartile  Attendance Rate Greater Than Expected Progress: Mathematics Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Level III) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation Algebra I by Grade 8 - Performance (Level III) AP/IB and Advanced/Dual Enrollment Course Completion Participation AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: Mathematics 96.1% 2% 27% 59% 74% 515 22.7 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q2 Campus Profile Report Step 2 Blank values for an Indicator Score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a Quartile occur if there are less than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The Attendance Rate Indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to both Reading/ELA and Mathematics. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction.

10 10 Mathematics Example: Pflugerville HS Methodology for AADD – Step 3 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Step 1 Calculate campus performance on each distinction indicator for subject Compare performance on each indicator to campuses in Comparison Group Indicator Pflugerville HS Score Quartile  Attendance Rate Greater Than Expected Progress: Mathematics Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Level III) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation Algebra I by Grade 8 - Performance (Level III) AP/IB and Advanced/Dual Enrollment Course Completion Participation AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: Mathematics 96.1% 2% 27% 59% 74% 515 22.7 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q2 Campus Profile Report Step 2 Total Indicators for Mathematics 2 of 7 Step 3 Generate a single outcome for campus by subject Evaluation of Campus Outcomes: 2 of 7 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 2 of 7 = 29%

11 11 Mathematics Example: Pflugerville HS Methodology for AADD – Step 4 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting Step 1 Calculate campus performance on each distinction indicator for subject Compare performance on each indicator to campuses in Comparison Group Indicator Pflugerville HS Score Quartile  Attendance Rate Greater Than Expected Progress: Mathematics Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Level III) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation Algebra I by Grade 8 - Performance (Level III) AP/IB and Advanced/Dual Enrollment Course Completion Participation AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: Mathematics 96.1% 2% 27% 59% 74% 515 22.7 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q2 Campus Profile Report Step 2 Total Indicators for Mathematics 2 of 7 Step 3 Generate a single outcome for campus by subject Evaluation of Campus Outcomes: 2 of 7 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 2 of 7 = 29% Distinction Target: High School = 33% or higher NO DISTINCTION EARNED Distinction Designation Identify campuses that qualify to earn Distinction Designations Step 4

12 12 Campuses Earning Distinction Designations by Campus Type 2013 Statewide Summary Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting School Type2013 Distinction ElemMiddleHSMulti Total Count Percent Reading/ELA54718363288219.6% Reading/ELA & Mathematics16481147324245.0% Mathematics13312284243634.2% Top 25% Progress32694117165536.5% Top 25% Progress & Reading/ELA1868834113193.7% Top 25% Progress & Math2089348113604.2% Top 25% Progress, Reading/ELA & Math385182152407598.9% Not Eligible2,6638631,1023284,95657.9% Totals4,6121,7061,7474908,555100.0%

13 Resources  2014 Accountability Development http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/index.html http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/index.html  2013 Accountability Rating System http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/index.html http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/index.html  Performance Reporting Home Page http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport  Performance Reporting E-mail performance.reporting@tea.state.tx.us performance.reporting@tea.state.tx.us  Division of Performance Reporting Telephone (512) 463-9704 13 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

Download ppt "AADDC: Science and Social Studies | March 7, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview."

Similar presentations

AIE Annual Conference| September 24, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson,

AIE Annual Conference| September 24, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson,
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.

August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report 2007-2008 Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/18/2008 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.

Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/18/2008 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) 2012-13.

Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.

Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.

1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden

Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.

Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.

Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.

State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.

APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.

2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.

PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
2014 Accountability Commissioner’s Decisions – April 4, 2014.

2014 Accountability Commissioner’s Decisions – April 4, 2014.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.

2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
2015 Accountability Commissioner’s Final Decisions KIM GILSON SENIOR CONSULTANT, DATA AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGION 10 ESC 972-348-1480

2015 Accountability Commissioner’s Final Decisions KIM GILSON SENIOR CONSULTANT, DATA AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGION 10 ESC
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.

State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment 972-348-1480

2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.

The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google