1. GROUP 5 Mami Adachi – University of Sacred Heart Kim Min Jung – Catholic Sangli College Ming-Rea Kao - Wenzao Fr. Abraham Boncolin Latoza, OAR – University of Negros Occidental-Recoletos Yu- wen Lee –Providence University Prabha Limpratsutr – St. Louis College Ami Soewandi - Widya andala Catholic University Caridad Tobia Shritharan – Miriam College Enrico Paulo Vicencio – De La Salle- College of St. Benilde Fr. Michael Calmano – Nanzan University

2. Q1: “social entrepreneurship”  The group agreed to delimit the term.  Simple definition: “ it connotes business”, it provides assistance to people who are socially and economically helpless  It means economic empowerment  It provides employment and sustainable jobs  It offers and provides skills training  It creates jobs and make money

3. Q1: Examples  From “Rags to Riches”  Livelihood Programs to a country with poverty problems like Philippines  Adopting Communities like Informal Settlers, training them with vocational formation  Taiwan Experience: Coffee manufactured by Cooperatives with sure market and profits shared back to coffee growers

4. Q1: “difficulty” to do social entrepreneurship  When a school decides not to engage.  When it only professes to provide awareness/social consciousness.  When a school ceases to exhaust its potentials to serve.

5. Q2: Service Learning-Program  SLP- is just one methodology  “Not new” to a Catholic perspective  It is just one of the various areas in the school that provides service learning programs  It costs the Institution  It can be modified, it can take a new style  Education must strike the balance of educating not only the mind but also the heart (caritas et scientia)  Philippine Experience: (babad-malay-suri) or exposure-action-reflection gears towards VALUE FORMATION

6. Q3: empirical teaching experience  It should invite wider/holistic impact to a community  Respondents number is a big deal  If the students appreciated the program it is not the experience but the values being formed in them whilst engaged in the exposure  It is the post-encounter that matters

7. SLP: Revived and CONTINUED?  Compulsary  NO (ACADEMIC)CREDIT  12 hours in Class 18 Hours in Exposure  Seen by students as “useless” from the start  The desire to revive or continue is due to the  VALUES SURELY FORMED during the process.

8. Final remarks: Doing good is addictive  The experience of doing good to others begets good motivation to continue doing good whatever it costs.