Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Paul Goossens, VP of Application Engineering

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Paul Goossens, VP of Application Engineering"— Presentation transcript:

1 High-Fidelity Physical Modeling for Aerospace Mechatronics Applications
Paul Goossens, VP of Application Engineering Dr. Orang Vahid, Senior Modeling Engineer

2 Agenda Introduction Case Studies:
Quadrotor – Quanser Planetary Rover – University of Waterloo and Canadian Space Agency Challenges in Model-based design and development Maplesoft Engineering Solutions

3 Physical Model-based Development
“Virtual” Prototyping through Model-based Design and Development plays an increasingly key role in system design, commissioning and testing. Increasing adoption of MBD and simulation Reduce prototyping cycles and costs Increase end-user functionality, quality, safety and reliability Deterministic, repeatable testing platform Connection to real components with virtual subsystems through Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) Testing is critical to this strategy Validation of subcomponents and/or controllers before integrating into the vehicle reduces errors and costs Validation of model against the real thing improves the whole process, dramatically reducing development cycles and time-to-market in the future Greater demand for greater model fidelity…

4 Emerging Challenges... Scalability Capacity Tasks
Number of functions (Complexity)

5 Emerging Challenges... Scalability Multi-domain Modeling Capacity
Tasks Capacity Number of functions (Complexity) Engine/ Powertrain Torque/Speed Inputs Chassis/Tire Outputs Apply Load??? Driveline

6 Emerging Challenges... Scalability Multi-domain Modeling
Real-time Performance Tasks Capacity Number of functions (Complexity) Engine/ Powertrain Torque/Speed Inputs Chassis/Tire Outputs Apply Load??? Driveline

7 Qball-X4 Development

8 Qball-X4 Development Plant Model in MapleSim Paper Concept for Product
Rough Feasibility Study Paper Calculations, Low fidelity Simulations Plant Model in MapleSim

9 Qball-X4 Development Plant Model in MapleSim Paper Concept for Product
Rough Feasibility Study Paper Calculations, Low fidelity Simulations Plant Model in MapleSim Export Plant to Simulink Dev RT Controller in QUARC Include Visualization Modify Model Structure, and Fidelity Evaluate Performance Trade various Concepts *Simulink is a registered trademark of The Mathworks, Inc. Quarc is a registered trademark of Quanser Consulting, Inc.

10 Qball-X4 Development Plant Model in MapleSim Paper Concept for Product
Rough Feasibility Study Paper Calculations, Low fidelity Simulations Plant Model in MapleSim Export Plant to Simulink Dev RT Controller in QUARC Include Visualization Modify Model Structure, and Fidelity Build Subsystem Prototypes for Technically Risky Subsystems Evaluate Performance Trade various Concepts Parameter Identification *Simulink is a registered trademark of The Mathworks, Inc. Quarc is a registered trademark of Quanser Consulting, Inc.

11 Qball-X4 Development Plant Model in MapleSim
Paper Concept for Product Rough Feasibility Study Paper Calculations, Low fidelity Simulations Plant Model in MapleSim Export Plant to Simulink Dev RT Controller in QUARC Include Visualization Modify Model Structure, and Fidelity Build Subsystem Prototypes for Technically Risky Subsystems Evaluate Performance Trade various Concepts Prototype Full System Deploy with Sim Controller Parameter Identification Parameter Identification Deploy Final Product, Controllers Curriculum

12 Qball-X4 Development Multibody Modeling

13 Qball-X4 Development Multibody Modeling

14 Qball-X4 Development Multibody Modeling

15 Qball-X4 Development Multibody Modeling

16 Qball-X4 Development Multibody Modeling

17 Qball-X4 Development Multibody Modeling

18 Qball-X4 Development Multibody Modeling

19 Qball-X4 Development Multibody Modeling

20 Qball-X4 Development MapleSim Model:
Multibody Quadrotor Model + Controller

21 Qball-X4 Development MapleSim Model:
Multibody Quadrotor Model + Controller

22 Qball-X4 Development MapleSim Model: Multibody Quadrotor Model

23 Qball-X4 Development MOVIE #1

24 Qball-X4 Development QUARC®/Simulink® Model
Generated s-function from the MapleSim plant model Physical plant imported into Quarc model Rapid control prototyping can begin Fidelity of model improved in Quarc Sysid techniques used to get accurate model of actuator dynamics Limitations and sensors, electronics, and computation considered now. Processor fundamental sample time Sensor resolution, bandwidth, etc Non linearities Cad Model visualization used to aid in understanding *Simulink is a registered trademark of The Mathworks, Inc. Quarc is a registered trademark of Quanser Consulting, Inc.

25 Qball-X4 Development Flight Test MOVIE #2

26 Planetary Rovers

27 Planetary Rovers Rover Modeling: A Multi-disciplinary Approach
System Components Rover dynamics Wheels Solar cells Wheel motors Battery Power electronics Heaters Robotic arms, other peripherals Terrain Environment

28 Angular velocity input
Planetary Rovers Six-wheeled Rocker-Bogie Rover Modeling Environment Angular velocity input Steering angle input Visualization Environment

29 Planetary Rovers Rigid Wheel Model

30 Planetary Rovers Visualization in MapleSim MOVIE #3

31 Planetary Rovers Rover Kinematics

32 Planetary Rovers Rover Kinematics
Automatic Generation of the Constraint Equations in Maple

33 27 Constraint Equations of 36 variables
Planetary Rovers Rover Kinematics Automatic Generation of the Constraint Equations in Maple -2.*l1x-1.*ySL*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)+ySR*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)+zSL*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)-1.*zSR*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)-1.*cos(xi)*cos(eta)*xSL+cos(xi)*cos(eta)*xSR-1.*ySL*sin(xi)*cos(zeta)+ySR*sin(xi)*cos(zeta)-1.*zSL*sin(xi)*sin(zeta)+zSR*sin(xi)*sin(zeta) -1.*l1y+sin(xi)*cos(eta)*xSL-1.*sin(xi)*cos(eta)*xSR-1.*ySL*cos(xi)*cos(zeta)+ySR*cos(xi)*cos(zeta)-1.*zSL*cos(xi)*sin(zeta)+zSR*cos(xi)*sin(zeta)+ySL*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)-1.*ySR*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)-1.*zSL*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)+zSR*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)+l1y*cos(phi)-1.*l1z*sin(phi) -1.*l1z+cos(eta)*sin(zeta)*ySL-1.*cos(eta)*sin(zeta)*ySR-1.*cos(eta)*cos(zeta)*zSL+cos(eta)*cos(zeta)*zSR+l1y*sin(phi)-1.*sin(eta)*xSL+sin(eta)*xSR+l1z*cos(phi) -1.*cos(xi)*cos(eta)*xSL+cos(xi)*cos(eta)*xBL-1.*ySL*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)-1.*ySL*sin(xi)*cos(zeta)+yBL*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)+yBL*sin(xi)*cos(zeta)+zSL*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)-1.*zSL*sin(xi)*sin(zeta)-1.*zBL*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)+zBL*sin(xi)*sin(zeta)-1.*l3x sin(xi)*cos(eta)*xSL-1.*sin(xi)*cos(eta)*xBL+ySL*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)-1.*ySL*cos(xi)*cos(zeta)-1.*yBL*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)+yBL*cos(xi)*cos(zeta)-1.*zSL*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)-1.*zSL*cos(xi)*sin(zeta)+zBL*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)+zBL*cos(xi)*sin(zeta)+l3y -1.*sin(eta)*xSL+sin(eta)*xBL+cos(eta)*sin(zeta)*ySL-1.*cos(eta)*sin(zeta)*yBL-1.*cos(eta)*cos(zeta)*zSL+cos(eta)*cos(zeta)*zBL+l3z -1.*cos(xi)*cos(eta)*xSR+cos(xi)*cos(eta)*xBR-1.*ySR*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)-1.*ySR*sin(xi)*cos(zeta)+yBR*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)+yBR*sin(xi)*cos(zeta)+zSR*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)-1.*zSR*sin(xi)*sin(zeta)-1.*zBR*cos(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)+zBR*sin(xi)*sin(zeta)+l3x xSR*sin(xi)*cos(eta)*cos(phi)-1.*xSR*sin(eta)*sin(phi)-1.*xBR*sin(xi)*cos(eta)*cos(phi)+xBR*sin(eta)*sin(phi)+ySR*cos(phi)*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)-1.*ySR*cos(phi)*cos(xi)*cos(zeta)+ySR*cos(eta)*sin(zeta)*sin(phi)-1.*yBR*cos(phi)*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)+yBR*cos(phi)*cos(xi)*cos(zeta)-1.*yBR*cos(eta)*sin(zeta)*sin(phi)-1.*zSR*cos(phi)*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)-1.*zSR*cos(phi)*cos(xi)*sin(zeta)-1.*zSR*cos(eta)*cos(zeta)*sin(phi)+zBR*cos(phi)*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*cos(zeta)+zBR*cos(phi)*cos(xi)*sin(zeta)+zBR*cos(eta)*cos(zeta)*sin(phi)+l3y -1.*xSR*sin(xi)*cos(eta)*sin(phi)-1.*xSR*sin(eta)*cos(phi)+xBR*sin(xi)*cos(eta)*sin(phi)+xBR*sin(eta)*cos(phi)-1.*ySR*sin(phi)*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)+ySR*sin(phi)*cos(xi)*cos(zeta)+ySR*cos(eta)*sin(zeta)*cos(phi)+yBR*sin(phi)*sin(xi)*sin(eta)*sin(zeta)-1.*yBR*sin(phi)*cos(xi)*cos(zeta)... 27 Constraint Equations of 36 variables

34 Planetary Rovers Rover Kinematics Additional Constraints and Forces
Differential Joint Steering Wheel/soil forces

35 Planetary Rovers MOVIE #4 Rover Kinematics
Quasi-static Simulation using MATLAB® MOVIE #4 *Matlab is a registered trademark of The Mathworks, Inc.

36 Planetary Rovers Rover Path Planning Energy Optimization

37 Planetary Rovers Rover Component Library Software Component Library
Modeling Workspace

38 Planetary Rovers Hardware Components Lighting System Solar Arrays

39 Planetary Rovers Hardware Components Battery Motor Flywheel
Load simulator PXI Sensors Rover weight? 200 kg Equivalent kinetic energy representation

40 Planetary Rovers HiL Implementation NI® PXI Software
Hardware (Test Bench) Component Modeling Solar Panels Battery Motor Irradiation Model Lighting System Solar Panels Charge Controller NI® PXI Battery Inverter Load Simulator LabVIEW™ 2009 Rover Model HiL Graphical User Interface Motor Flywheel

41 Planetary Rovers HiL Implementation

42 Planetary Rovers HiL Implementation

43 Planetary Rovers HiL Implementation – Sample Results
Summer Full Load - Pure Hardware vs. Solar Panel, Motor, Load Simulator in the loop Summer Full Load - Pure Hardware vs. Solar Panel in the Loop

44 What is MapleSim? MapleSim is a truly unique physical modeling tool:
Built on a foundation of symbolic computation technology Handles all of the complex mathematics involved in the development of engineering models Multi-domain systems, plant modeling, control design Leverages the power of Maple to take advantage of extensive analytical tools Reduces model development time from months to days while producing high- fidelity, high-performance models

45 Maplesoft Engineering Solutions
Multi-domain physical modeling -dSPACE® -LabVIEW™ -NI® VeriStand™ -MATLAB® & Simulink® -B&R Automation Studio Driveline Component Library More Libraries *Simulink and MATLAB are registered trademark of The Mathworks, Inc. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.

46 The Symbolic Advantage
Automatic Equation Generation Advanced analysis Parameter optimization Sensitivity etc Multibody kinematics and dynamics Greater insight into system behavior Symbolic model simplification Optimized code generation Best performance ~10x faster than similar tools Equation-based Model Creation Enter system equations Test/Validate model Easy component block generation

47 Hardware in the Loop Simulation
Equation and code generation Controller implementation (and design) Realtime management Embedded controller Data acquisition Plant model Analysis Controller design -dSPACE® -LabVIEW™ -NI® VeriStand™ -MATLAB® & Simulink® -B&R Automation Studio System HIL Simulation *Simulink and MATLAB are registered trademark of The Mathworks, Inc. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.

48 Key Takeaways... Physical modeling: increasingly important – and increasingly complex – in systems design, testing and integration. Symbolic technology: proven engineering technology that significantly improves model fidelity without sacrificing real-time performance. MapleSim: ideal tool for rapid development of high-fidelity physical models of mechatronics systems to help engineers achieve their design goals. With the drive for greater fuel efficiency, quality and safety, physical modeling is becoming increasingly important – and increasingly complex – in automotive systems design, testing and integration Symbolic technology is a proven engineering technology that significantly helps to improve model fidelity without sacrificing real-time performance MapleSim is the ideal tool for rapid development of high-fidelity physical models of automotive systems to help engineers achieve their design goals...

49 Thank You! Questions? To stay connected:


Download ppt "Paul Goossens, VP of Application Engineering"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google