Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLance Martyn Modified over 9 years ago
1
Quantification of sediment concentrations and fluxes A comparison between optical and acoustic measurements Utrecht, 11 June 2013 – Emile Lemey
2
Management JDN Departments DREDGING Marine Environmental Department MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT SEDIMENTS SOIL GROUNDWATER SPECIAL WASTE Envisan WHO?WHO? ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY HEALTH SAFETY SECURITY ENVIRONMENT QHSSE
3
Management JDN Departments DREDGING Marine Environmental Department MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT SEDIMENTS SOIL GROUNDWATER SPECIAL WASTE Envisan WHO?WHO? ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY HEALTH SAFETY SECURITY ENVIRONMENT QHSSE
4
WHEATSTONE Secondary Stabilisation Project WHAT?WHAT? Dredging near sensitive marine habitats Intensive dredge plume monitoring Hind cast hydrodynamic modelling
5
WHEATSTONE Secondary Stabilisation Project WHAT?WHAT? Dredge plume monitoring -Daily transects around CSD -Perpendicular to current direction -Downstream of turbidity source
6
MONITORING METHODS 1)Optical measurements -YSI 6920 V2 multi-parameter probe -Davit with an electrical winch -Undulating motion -Turbidity, depth, temperature, conductivity and salinity -Turbidity SSC with conversion coefficient 2)Acoustic measurements -Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) Workhorse Mariner (Teledyne RD Instruments) -VISea Plume Detection Toolbox (PDT) software (Aqua Vision) -Mounted in moon pool of vessel, fixed depth -Current speed and direction -Backscatter data SSC HOW?HOW?
7
MONITORING METHODS 3)Integration positioning system / loggings -Through software (QINSy and Visea PDT) -GPS/DGPS data absolute flow velocity and direction HOW?HOW?
8
POST PROCESSING 1)Acoustic method -Sediment flux calculation in Visea PDT 2)Optical method -Data outlier removal -Surfer surface modelling software (© Golden Software) -Quantification of total flux (kg/s) HOW?HOW?
9
-Most transects: similar sediment profiles RESULTS Optical: Acoustic:
10
-Some differences in profiles RESULTS Optical: Acoustic:
11
-Some differences in profiles RESULTS Optical: Acoustic:
12
RESULTS -Quantification of fluxes
13
RESULTS -Quantification of fluxes
14
-Point measurement comparison RESULTS
15
Both methods yield similar profiles Real-time vs. Intensive post processing Flux quantification results differ TSS concentrations by acoustic measurement overestimated? Maybe due to Algorithm used in processing ADCP + PDT very useful as visualisation tool Not yet alternative for optical TSS quantification of complex dredge plumes CONCLUSIONS
16
OFFICE JAN DE NUL N.V. Tragel 60 – 9308 HOFSTADE-AALST Belgium Tel.: 32 53 73 17 11 – Fax: 32 53 78 17 60 E-mail: info@jandenul.com Website: www.jandenul.com
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.