1. Family Philanthropy Case Studies
Christine K. Galloway
Okabena Company
Jill M. Koosmann
HRK Group

2. Dayton Brothers “Executives of the Decade” ~ Corporate Report 1979
Don Wally Doug Bruce Ken

3. Dayton Family/ Corporate/Philanthropic History
The Dayton Foundation is created with an endowment of $1 million The Dayton Company’s bylaws establish the practice of giving 5% of pretax profits back to the community The Dayton Company enters discount merchandising with the opening of its first Target Store The Dayton Corporation has its first public offering of common stock. Okabena Company is incorporated K.N. Dayton instrumental in starting “Five Percent Club” today called “Keystone Club” – member corporations agree to give away 5 percent of pre-tax profits for philanthropy. Some corporations give 2 percent Dayton Hudson Corp. changes its name to Target Corporation

4. Andersen Leaders Generation 1 - Founder
Andersen Lumber Company
1903
Hans Andersen

5. Andersen Leaders Generation 2 – Innovator
By 1929 builds Andersen into the largest
specialized window company in the country -
a title it still holds today.
Fred Andersen

6. Andersen Family/ Corporate/Philanthropic History
Hans Andersen founded Andersen Lumbering Company; now Andersen Corporation
Hans introduced his underlying business theory:
1. Make a product that is different and better Hire the best people and pay top wages
3. Provide steady employment insofar as humanly possible Reward ideas and share with your community
Hans signed the first profit-sharing checks for employees
Bayport Foundation is established, which is a corporate foundation and funded annually from Andersen Corporation’s profits
Andersen Foundation is established by Fred Andersen (Hans’ son – G2)
Hugh J. Andersen Foundation established by Hugh Andersen (G3)
MAHADH Foundation (now HRK Foundation) established by Bill and Betty Hulings (G3)
Fred Andersen sold partial ownership in Andersen Corporation to its employees through a stock ownership trust
Katherine B. Andersen Fund of the St. Paul Foundation is established
Andersen celebrates 100 years in business with a partnership with Habitat for Humanity to build 100 homes
Andersen Corporation is still privately held and all five foundations/funds are still running strong

7. Dayton Family Philanthropic Structure
Foundations
Chadwick
Foundation #1
Foundation #2
Foundation #3
Wood-Rill WM
Oakleaf
Meadowood

8. Okabena Structure Okabena Company (parent)
Mission Statement: To deliver superior and creative, integrated financial services, founded on our core principles of integrity, dedication, and respect.
Okabena Company (parent)
Integrated financial, tax and estate planning
Family continuity and client education
Foundation administration and compliance
Accounting, reporting and compliance
Okabena Investment Services, Inc. (subsidiary)
Strategic and tactical asset allocation
Manager selection and monitoring
Boulder Bridge Trust Company (subsidiary)
Trusteeship
Trust Administration
Executorship

9. Andersen Related Foundations
Andersen Foundation (FKA Bayport Foundation)
1941
Fred C. & Katherine B. Andersen Foundation (FKA Andersen Foundation)
1959
Hugh J. Andersen Foundation
1962
HRK Foundation (FKA MAHADH Foundation)
Katherine B. Andersen Fund of the St. Paul Foundation
1987
St. Croix Valley
Habitat for Humanity
The Andersen Related Foundations meet often, collaborate regularly,
but never speak for each other.

10. HRK Foundation HRK Foundation MAHADH Fund Family Fund #1

11. HRK Structure
Integration of long-term investment, financial, tax, and philanthropic estate plans
Leadership team consists of CEO, CFO, CIO & CPO
Family motto = “Good Stewards with a Generous Spirit”
HRK Foundation structure allows for “life-cycle” giving due to having seven funds under one foundation umbrella (older generations give more from their funds and younger generations build their funds as they grow into their philanthropy)
Family members contribute annually to their funds so the Foundation’s giving is a combination of 5% of the endowments and pass-through from annual giving

12. HRK Foundation Giving Philosophy
Family has a strong tradition of general operating support and “quiet giving” – and they believe “showing up” consistently for grantees is important
Family believes that giving consists of more than just grants – PRIs, Impact Investing, volunteering, advocacy, networking funders

13. Dayton Family Philanthropic Structure
Pros
Diffuses potential for conflict
Creates flexibility to focus on individual philanthropic objectives
Increased number of individuals involved in philanthropic decisions
Reduced complexity – family dynamics
Increased complexity – administration
Allows for anonymous giving
Cons
Lack of asset aggregation reduces potential impact of charitable dollars
No family “glue”
Does not promote a unified family legacy

14. HRK Foundation Structure
Pros
Family has the support of the family office
Flexibility in giving by each family unit
Individual passions can be funded
Collaboration can increase grant impact
Provides family “glue”
Cons
Formal structure that meets regularly
Conflicts can arise from consensus giving on common fund

15. Dayton Family Generational Legacy
Langwater Foundation
5th Generation (pooled)