1. Ozgur Ates Hampton University HUGS 2009-JLAB TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design”

2. Secondary lines for  +, K +, or p beam 50 GeV/c proton beam to primary production target Secondary lines for  -, K -, or p beam The Hadron Hall at J-PARC

3. T ime R eversal violation E xperiment with K aons: Search for New Physics beyond the Standard Model by Measurement of T-violating Transverse Muon Polarization in K +  μ + π 0 ν μ Decays New official website: http://trek.kek.jp

4. Planar GEMs “C1” between CsI and C2, or in replacement of C2 Cylindrical device “C0” in replacement of C1

5. C1: Planar GEMs for TREK “ C1” To cover CsI gaps on the outside

6. Target and Tracking Better kinematical resolution Addition of C0 and C1 GEM chambers with - high position resolution - higher rate performance Larger C3-C4 distance Use of He bags New target E246J-PARC

7. Upgraded Trek Detector Apparatus

9. Geant4 Simulation 9 Geant4 studies initiated in Summer 2008 GOALS: Realistic geometry of upgraded TREK apparatus Realistic tracking performance Obtain design criteria for Sizes and locations of new elements Angular and spatial resolution of tracks at detector elements Which spatial detector resolution is adequate? Optimization of material budget

10. Got started with Geometry of target (from Steffen/Eric) + C0 + C1 + C2, coded materials Full cylinders of target and C0 but only one of 12 sectors for C1,C2 Generate monoenergetic 100 MeV muons uniformly distributed over volume of target with opening angle according to muon gap size. Produce hits in detector elements of C0, C1, C2 Use multiple scattering or physics off Record hits along track and write set of variables (th, ph, z, y, p, edep. mom, etc.) to ROOT TREE Geant4 Simulation

13. Root Analyses Studied acceptance of tracks in C0, C1, C2. From this study, determined required geometric sizes of C0 and C1. Found out that; Length of C0 should be: 300 mm Width of C1 should be: 200 mm Length of C1 should be: 480 mm

14. Determination of Length of C0

16. Determination of Width of C1

17. Determination of Length of C1

18. Straight-Line Fit in 3D Recorded hit locations of Readout layers of C0, C1 and C2. Applied straight-line fit in 3D for each generated event. Reconstruct straight track from recorded hits with 3D straight- line fit Recorded fit parameters for each track, and locations of fitted track at each 3 readout layers. Closest distance of reconstructed track to origin of generated track (vertex difference)(1st column) Difference of generated hit position at detectors(C0,C1,C2) and that of the recons. track (2nd to 4th column)

19. RESIDUALS

20. Systematic Study of Resolution

22. Backup Slides Sanity check: Residuals for Phys=OFF and perfect detectors Intrinsic tracking resolution: Explicit Gaussian smearing of hits Study effect of physics (MS, Bremss., Ionization, Pairprod. ) separately from intrinsic resolution, use balancing as criterion for design resolution studied residuals, i.e. difference of generated and reconstructed hit locations at each readout layer, and at target vertex (closest point with respect to generated vertex) studied residuals with and without physics activated in Geant4 (multiple scattering and energy loss) concluded lower limits the required intrinsic resolution (<<residual)

23. High Rate Chamber – Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM)  Still Gas Ionization and Avalanche, again, but…  A different way to get an intense electric field,  Without dealing with fragile tiny wires, and  Release + ions much faster -V ~400v 0.002” GEM To computer http://gdd.web.cern.ch/GDD/