Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMoses Boxell Modified over 9 years ago
1
24 th Hwa Chong Institution Projects Competition BRIEFING 2008
2
Objectives To enhance the research culture amongst both pupils and teachers To promote (active and creative) learning beyond the classroom
3
Quote “Enabling Teachers, Nurturing Students through Innovation and Enterprise” Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Minister for Education I&E is about a qualitative change in the interactions between teachers and students, in and out of the classroom. I&E is about teaching less and learning more, about spurring independent thinking and learning, and about encouraging students to follow their passions.
4
Joy / Passion Life Skills Challenge & Opportunity Showcase creativity Apply knowledge Serve community Thinking Problem solving Collaboration Communication etc Open minds Creates new knowledge What’s in it for you?
5
10 categories of projects Experimental Research 1 Non-Experimental Research 2 (NEW) Innovation & Problem-Solving 3 Resource Development 4 Creative Arts 5 Language Arts (English) 6 Language Arts (Chinese) 7 Service Learning 8 Maths & Infocomm Research 9 Guidelines for each Project Category provided on Competition Website Entrepreneurship 10
6
Projects Competition Committee Resource Person : Ms Yeo Hwee Joo (DST) Projects Competition Manager : Mr Steven Su Co-ordinators Cat 1Cat 2Cat 3Cat 6 Cat 7Cat 8Cat 9aCat 9bCat 10 Cat 5Cat 4
7
Rules and Regulations Compulsory for Sec 1 & Sec 2 Sec 3 & 4 – strongly encouraged Max 1 project per student No of members 4 (per group) Members : different consortiums / levels / schools / countries Age group applies A HCI teacher-mentor Maintain a website from semi-finals, and to be uploaded prior to semi-finals judging Observe copyright laws
8
No. of members in a group If group has 4 members only mentor needs to respond (i.e. accept or reject group) If group has >4 but 6 members mentor responds coordinator responds If group has >6 members please see Project Manager
9
Number of projects allowed If 1 project only mentor needs to respond If 2 projects mentor responds Director Consortium responds If >2 projects mentor responds Dean of Studies responds
10
Signing up of project Sign up for your compulsory project first e.g. AEP, SMRP, SMTP, EP, etc In the NEW registration portal the first project must be approved or rejected first then only will you be allowed to team up for a second project
11
Take note Issue of loafer(s) in a group when a group has too many members, some members may not have much to do leader should devise a workplan to divide work equally for each member (e.g. web designer, researcher, presenter, etc) mentor must be consulted frequently
12
Take note Uploading of web files from semi-finals onwards use English operating system to create all your work to minimize inconveniences to yourself later on when uploading is carried out
13
Awards Reflected in EOY Result Slip GradeAchievementRounds A*OutstandingGrand Finals AVery GoodFinals B+GoodSemi-finals BFair GoodSemi-finals CFairPreliminary DParticipationPreliminary
14
Take note If a group, after committing to do a project, gives a NO SHOW or WITHDRAW from the project judging mentor and director consortium will be kept informed if reason(s) is not acceptable, project work will be graded ‘F’ in the EOY result slip
15
Awards for Lower Sec Achievement Relevant subject Other subjects A* or High Dist 12 CP 5 CP A or Dist 10 CP 4 CP B+ 8 CP 3 CP B 5 CP 2 CP C or D 0 CP
16
Awards for Upper Sec Achievement Relevant subject Other subjects A* or High Dist 10 CP 4 CP A or Dist 9 CP 3 CP B+ or Merit 7 CP 2 CP B or Semi-Finalist 4 CP 1 CP C or D 0 CP @ change takes effect from 2008
17
Awards Medals Only for those who obtained Grade A* (and Sec 1s who obtained Grade A) Certificates for Dist and High Dist only 10 Outstanding Entries will qualify for the Grand Finals (Projects Day) 1 st prize: $500 2 nd prize: $400 3 rd prize: $300 Merit awards: $100 book vouchers
18
Awards Website Design Award 1 st prize: $ 80 2 nd prize: $ 50 3 rd prize: $ 30 For those who qualify for the Finals, but excluded from the Grand Finals Provided webpage is not taken from freeware template/design, nor from someone else’s work (i.e. must be purely original web design)
19
Take note Poster Design Competition will be removed from this year
20
Schedule RoundsDates Preliminary*01 Apr 08, Tue (T2/Wk3) Semi-Finals*08 Jul 08, Tue (T3/Wk2) Finals15 Aug 08, Fri (T3/Wk8) Grand Finals*12 Sep 08, Fri (T4/Wk1) * Curriculum hours
21
Judging Centralised managed by co-ordinators judged by teachers Instructions issued by co-ordinators posted on emb / competition website Assessment rubrics competition website
22
Judging For All Rounds oral presentation Semi-finals includes presentation of a part of the web-based report Finals includes judging of web-report
23
Judgi ng Grand Finals (Oral Presentation) compete amongst different categories of project work judged by professionals from external institutions / organizations Assessment Criteria access/download from competition website will be updated
24
Take note Reflections to take stock of your learning journey as you do your project will be incorporated in the judging rubrics from this year (NEW)
25
Registration Online Registration Via competition website, just after CNY in Week7 Deadline : 07 Mar 08 (T1/Week10/Fri) Register under appropriate category Provide up-to-date data
26
Take note Ethics agreement before a student is allowed to sign up for a project, an ETHICS agreement must be signed online if no agreement is signed, the student’s USERID will not be available for project registration a real case that occurred
27
Take note To allow for a project to be judged on its own merit, no mention of mentor’s or advisor’s name, nor name of institution in the following rounds of judging Prelim Semi-finals Finals Acknowledgements carried out only at the Grand Finals
28
Registration List of registered entries and accepted or rejected groups will be posted online 2 registration portal 3 confirm details 4 submit details 5 mentor gets e-mail 6 mentor makes decision 7 see portal for results 1 seek mentor’s permission
29
Take note If after 2 to 3 days, no action taken (that is, accept or reject) by mentor leader (or one member) make an effort to find out the reason
30
Judging Venues Various venues e.g. classrooms, LTs, Computer Labs, LRCs, Consortium Rooms, new Science Research Labs, etc Check competition website for details
31
Project briefing cum workshop To be carried out for all pupils in Term 2, once registration is confirmed Will be reflected in Term 2’s calendar
32
Take note When writing emails to Principals, Deans, Directors, Coordinators, Mentors or Project Manager observe decorum in the use of English, and the manner it is written
33
Take note Appeal for project once results are published, judges’ decisions are final should a member or a group be aggrieved after a judging event, an appeal can be made appeal can be made through mentor appeal committee will be formed, which will be made up of Directors and above only genuine cases will be taken up
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.