Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTylor Luxton Modified over 9 years ago
1
Meshless Local Buckling Analysis of Steel Beams with Web Openings A.R. Zainal Abidin, B.A. Izzuddin Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
2
Introduction Steel Beams with Web Openings effective way for fulfilling the needs of integrating M&E services within the floor depth – benefiting from lower fabrication cost, enhanced structural performance and improved artistic quality some modifications are necessary – causing different regularity and even irregularity exposed to local effects e.g. web-post buckling, tee buckling, Vierendeel bending due to high force concentrations from secondary effects – potentially leading to a markedly different structural response and buckling resistance.
3
Scope & objectives of the study concerned with the development of sophisticated and yet efficient methods for assessing the elastic buckling of beams with regular and irregular web openings – particularly on local buckling effects in the web region a novel method is proposed – based on the Element Free Galerkin (EFG) method for the numerical discretisation – together with a simplified buckling assessment approach from the Rotational Spring Analogy (RSA)
4
Plate buckling by the EFG/RSA
5
EFG method moving least squares (MLS) approximation with C 1 continuity is adopted to construct the displacement field function essential boundary conditions are imposed via a penalty factor – preserves the size and positive-definiteness of the stiffness matrix compared to Lagrange multipliers approach RSA method offers simplified buckling assessment – involves only first-order kinematics as familiar in linear structural problems requires pre-determined stresses from planar analysis Combination of both methods – facilitates in further simplifications – e.g. application of a ‘local region’ and a rank 2 reduced eigenvalue problem
6
Planar response by dividing the beams into unit cells – resembles a super-element with a reduced number of freedoms subjected to EFG discretisation and considered under representative actions – a standard discrete assembly procedure is employed rigid body movement is prevented by means of simple supports at the web-post the approach is of most benefit in problems where the irregularity in the openings profile is not extensive over the beam length
7
Planar response the obtained stresses are continuous only within the local unit cell domain – though the associated inaccuracy is negligible for typical beams continuous field of in-plane stresses can still be achieved by applying the MLS approximation at the overall beam level – requires much more computational effort
8
Out-of-plane response Material stiffness employing the EFG method – in view of Kirchhoff’s thin plate theory the sum of two contributions – the bending stiffness matrix and the penalty stiffness matrix Geometric stiffness established from the planar stress field in accordance with the RSA – preserves the same discretisation Contribution of flange stiffness assumption – the flanges offer full restraint to the out-of-plane displacement of the web along the interconnecting edges considered only in terms of their material and geometric rotational stiffness
9
Simplified buckling analysis Local region approach consisting of at least three unit cells – successively shifted along the beam span – reduces the size of the stiffness matrices significantly Rank 2 reduced eigenvalue problem an assumed mode and its complementary mode are combined – enables the original MDOF problem to be solved effectively via an iterative approach – accelerates the convergence of iterations to the lowest buckling mode
10
Application example 1 symmetric castellated beam with regular hexagonal web openings has a geometry – length L = 30m, depth D p = 1.603m, spacing S = 1.472m, size of the regular hexagonal openings h 1 = 0.84m, b 1 = 1.1554 x h 1 and b2 = 0.578 x h 1 employs two circular holes near the left support – considering the same relative width of the existing holes, d o = b 1 uniformly distributed loading, UDL = 1.0 kN/m on top of the beam
11
Web-post buckling FEA-ADAPTIC Proposed EFG/RSA model
12
Application example 2 typical cellular beam originating from 1016x305x222UB length L = 30m, depth D p = 1.603m, spacing S = 1.472m and hole diameter d o = 0.84m allowing several holes with a 0.1m vertical offset – together with one infilled hole near the right end of the beam support transverse UDL of 1.0 kN/m – applied along the top edge considering a simply supported condition.
13
FEA-ADAPTIC Proposed EFG/RSA model Tee buckling
14
Application example 3 consequence of elongated openings is studied for a beam with regular rectangular holes along its web originated from 1016x305x222UB – length L = 30m, depth D p = 1.603m, spacing S = 1.472m and hole diameter d o = 0.84m modified to incorporate three elongated openings –located at the middle of the beam, near the right support and between these two positions subjected to 1.0 kN/m UDL under conditions of simple support.
15
FEA-ADAPTIC Proposed EFG/RSA model Combined tee and web-post buckling
16
Conclusion a new approach by combining the EFG method with the RSA – proved efficient for local buckling assessment of steel beams with web openings of various shapes and sizes enables accurate and efficient buckling predictions – different forms of local buckling are shown to be accurately predicted, even for beams with irregular openings offers an interactive assessment approach – via the shifting local region strategy and assumed modes – leading to a much reduced problem size significant advantages – due to the separation of the planar from the out-of-plane response and discretisation benefits of meshless methods – avoid the need for excessively small element meshes most computational benefits for beams with regular repeated cells – also applicable to more complicated beam profiles – including irregular holes, tapered beams and curved beams
17
Thank you A.R. Zainal Abidin, B.A. Izzuddin Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.