1. Membrane Separations & System Technologies and Case Studies Larry A. Lien

2. Overview of MDSs Process Membrane Expertise Hollow Fiber Microfiltration (MF).1 to 1 micronBacteria Ultrafiltration (UF)6K to 100K MWCOProteins Thin Film UF500, 1K, 2K & 3K MWCO Rejects Ferric Iron, Dyes & Small Colloids Nanofiltration (NF) 150 to 500 MWCODivalent salts rejected 99% but transmits salts or acids RO / EMS®50 to 150 MWCORejects all salts and acids 99+%

3. Typical spiral-wound element construction: 20 cm x 100 cm (30 m 2 ) High temperature – 140°C High pH – 14 Low pH – 0 High viscosity – 300 Centipoise @ 90°C High solids (soluble and suspended) Ultra-high pressures – 200 Bar

4. Spiral Wound Technology

5. Cross Flow Filtration Important Parameters Feed Vector Feed Spacer Turbulence Promoter Permeate Vector Keeping this ratio Low will minimize Fouling Our system is designed to keep this ratio to minimize fouling and reduce the cleaning frequency

6. Permeate Rate Does Effect Fouling

7. Acid reclamation concentration with Acid RO or purification with Modified NF Membranes Sulfuric Nitric Hydrochloric Hydrofluoric Boric Phosphoric Acetic Citric

8. Caustic high-pH environments with special RO and NF membranes Operated RO in high-pH cyanide solutions for 8 years’ special construction to meet waste water processing needs Recovery of 5-20% caustic solution with NF membranes with special construction for Aluminum Refinery processes

9. Case Studies for Why the Mining and Metal Refinery Industry should use Membrane Technology Recovery of metals Recovery of acids or caustic Recovery of energy Reduction of disposal costs

10. CASE STUDY: Yanacocha Gold mining heap leach water balance issue at Yanacocha, Peru First RO Water Treatment system installed in 2003 Currently, 2,750 m 3 /hr of barren leach solution is treated and discharged safely into the environment Most original membrane-elements installed in 2003 are still operating effectively Payback <4 months with gold recovery

11. Yanacocha process overview Heap Leach Cyanide Solution Mining Gold Extraction Merrill-Crowe Gold Recovery Carbon Column 117.5 ppm CN WAD Returned to Extraction 1750 m 3 /hr after Chlorine Treatment Discharged into Environment 2200 m 3 /hr RO

12. Yanacocha Water Quality Ion mg/L Feed mg/L Permeate mg/L Concentrate mg/L Discharge Limit mg/L pH10.18.09.76.0–9.0 CN WAD46.7<.05117.50.2 Arsenic0.4<.011.50.5–1.0 Mercury0.0025<.00050.00760.002 Nitrite5.190.0917.11 Nitrate27.50.6489.8 Copper3.10.111.60.3 Zinc17.20.365.11

13. RO of gold-cyanide complex concentration

14. 1000 m 3 Plant at MYSRL – Yanacocha Norte, Peru

16. Comments from Newmont’s Operators at Yanacocha Meets water quality discharge standards (including nitrites and nitrates not regulated) Allows for future safe operation and expansion Increased Gold and Silver recovery in membrane concentrates (Au and Ag rejected at 96.5% rate by the membranes – especially important during upset conditions) Cyanide recovery for re-use Chlorine consumption reduced by 75%, and overall operating cost is 70% less than that of a conventional precipitation plant EASY TO OPERATE

17. NF fractionation of gold and copper-cyanide complex

18. Copper-Gold fractionation process Special NF Gold Recovery Special RO Copper Recovery Heap Cu CN Cu CN Au CN Cu CN Preg Soln Au CN To Discharge Au Recovery

19. CASE STUDY: Copper and sulfuric acid rejection with special RO membrane-elements at Phelps- Dodge

20. 18 years of operation of EMS® systems at Freeport McMoRan (Phelps-Dodge) Rod Mill – El Paso, Texas 10-12% H 2 SO 4 8,000-9,000 ppm Cu 2 m 3 /hr Acid RO 2 1-2% H 2 SO 4 1,230 ppm CU pH.8 18 m 3 /hr 1% Acid 500 ppm Cu 1.3 m 3 /hr Acid RO 1 55 Bar 45°C To Scrap Copper Dissolving Process Tank ZERO-DISCHARGE SYSTEM <.01% Acid 3 ppm Cu 14.7 m 3 /h Rinse Water for Rod Mill.1% Acid 35 ppm Cu 16 m 3 /h

21. CASE STUDY: Freeport McMoRan (Phelps-Dodge) Acid Reference System installed in 1992 400 m 3 /day x 2 (two-pass system), total of 800 m 3 /day as Product 70 Bar capability All Stainless 316 with Viton Elastomers – Victaulic and O-rings Two-pass system to achieve product quality desired

23. Copper and Iron rejection with special Modified RO membrane-elements

24. AMD Copper Recovery Process

25. CASE STUDY: AMD application at Cananea de Mexico Recovery of Copper directly from EMS® concentrate EMS® process paid for itself within 6 months via copper recovery Allowed mine to open new reserves from an old 1890s mine shaft that would otherwise have flooded

27. CASE STUDY: Asarco Refinery Wastewater Reclamation Project Legacy refinery with ground water pollution issues after 100 years of operation Precipitation system installed in 1985 – $1M capital and huge operating costs Membrane system installed in 1993 preceding precipitation – reduced volume to precipitation system from 6 m 3 /hr to 1 m 3 /hr

28. Copper Refinery Precipitation Process Prior to Addition of Membrane System

29. Refinery layout with membrane system followed by precipitation Modified RO Membrane Concentrate to Existing Precipitation Volume Reduced by 80% RO Permeate 80% Recovery To Surface Discharge Media IIMedia I Liquid Returned to Feed for RO Mixing & Clarifying Tanks Filter Press Sludge Hauled Re-refined

30. Capital and operating costs: Precipitation vs. Membrane-Media PrecipitationMembrane-Media Cap Cost$1M$300K Chemicals$2.61 per m 3 $.15 * Sludge disposal per m 3 $26.53$1.35 Total sludge generated per m 3 19.24 Kg2.88 Kg Total Op cost per m 3 treated $29.15$1.82 * Membrane cleaning and media regeneration

31. Final Permeate Water Analyses Feed mg/l Permeate mg/l As10.1.081 Cd14.5.05 Zn33.5.01 Pb3.07.05 Cu.073.01 Fe.986.10 Mn3.33.05 Total Metals67.9.583 99.14% Extraction

32. Sun Metals Zero Discharge Project New Zinc Refinery in Townsville, Australia $A 0.5 Billion Investment Zero Discharge Permitting Because Townsville is on Great Barrier Reef After Construction Commenced Sun Discovered Their Plant Effluent Could contain up to 30 ppm of Boron Conventional Precipitation Could Not Remove Boron 32Proprietary and Confidential

33. Sun Metals Zero Discharge Zinc Refinery 33Proprietary and Confidential To Evaporation Ponds Low pH Process Water From Zinc Refinery – Peabody Water Lime 40 M 3 /hr Nanofiltration Pond (Saturated CaSO 4 ) 35 M 3 /hr Reverse Osmosis Boiler Feed Make-up 33 M 3 /hr

34. Cobre Los Crucas Seville, Spain Application 1 –New Mine Copper Open Pit Mine –Alkaline Mine Drainage from Rainy Season –Contaminated with Arsenic, Fluoride and Boron –Zero Liquid Discharge Facility Application 2 –To Maintain Static Hydraulic Pressure on Open Pit Ground Water is Pumped from Wells around the Perimeter of the Pit –These “Water Wells” once they reach the surface must be treated for high levels of Arsenic, Fluoride and Boron –Clean Permeate Re-injected into Ground Water –Membrane Plants Operate at 95-97% Recovery and the Concentrate is Evaporated

35. Application 1 CLC Alkaline Mine Drainage

36. Application 1 Cobre Los Crucas Copper Mine Alkaline Mine Drainage 36Proprietary and Confidential Alkaline Mine Drainage Pond Hollow-Fiber UF Backwashable 600 m 3 /hr 550 m 3 /hr Clean Permeate <100 ppm Sent to Mill as Process Water 50 m3/h To Evaporator Special Construction RO

37. Application 2 CLC Well Water Treatment and Re- injection Perimeter Wells Drilled around Open Pit Pump Ground Water that must be Treated before Re-injection

38. Application 2 Cobre Los Crucas ZLD Process Flow Diagram EMS Plant Recovery 95- 97.5% Hollow Fiber UF Backwash Recovered or Sent to Seeded Reactor Special RO 90% Recovery 750 m3/h 75 m3/h Wells 675 m3/h Seeded Reactor Special RO 60 Bar 66% Recovery 50 m3/h For Re-injection To Evaporator 25 m3/h Sludge to Filter Press Hollow Fiber UF For Re-injection

39. Case Study Waihi Gold Overview Process PDF for Newmont Waihi Gold EMS High Pressure < 400 psi Low Pressure < 200 psi TurbidityORP pH 30 M3/H back to Tailings Pond Turbidity AntiScalant Oxygen Scavenger Bisulfite or Thiosulfate Solution 210 M3/H Permeate to Discharge MMF With Backwash 9 Filters Feed 240 M3/H 10-25C 1 micron Bag Filters Duplex on Each Skid 2 Skidsof Low Pressure HF Each capable of 120 M3/H Feed at 75% Recovery 2 Skids Concentrator HF High Pressure Each capable of30 M3/H Feed at 50% Recovery 180 M3/H 30 M3/H 240 M3/H 60 M3/H PI TDS PI

40. Waihi Overview Process PDF for Newmont Waihi Gold EMS High Pressure < 400 psi Low Pressure < 200 psi TurbidityORP pH 30 M3/H back to Tailings Pond Turbidity AntiScalant Oxygen Scavenger Bisulfite or Thiosulfate Solution 210 M3/H Permeate to Discharge MMF With Backwash 9 Filters Feed 240 M3/H 10-25C 1 micron Bag Filters Duplex on Each Skid 2 Skidsof Low Pressure HF Each capable of 120 M3/H Feed at 75% Recovery 2 Skids Concentrator HF High Pressure Each capable of30 M3/H Feed at 50% Recovery 180 M3/H 30 M3/H 240 M3/H 60 M3/H PI TDS PI

41. Tapered Array for Primary System 9 Vessels In Parallel 5 Vessels In Parallel 1 st Stage 2 nd Stage 120 m3/h 30 m3/h 90 m3/h Ave 22.2 l/m2/h (l-m-h) Exit Volume From Each 6 m3/h

42. Tapered Array for Concentrator System 2 Vessels In Parallel 1 Vessel 1 st Stage 2 nd Stage 30 m3/h 15 m3/h Per vessel 15 m3/h Ave 22.2 l/m2/h (l-m-h) High Exit Velocity Less Fouling Exit Volume15 m3/h

43. Water Quality for Selected Ions of Interest Based on System Performance IonFeedPermeateConcentrate Discharge Limit µg/l (ppb) pH9.510.58.7 6.0-9.0 CN WAD690144720 NA Arsenic5021.5 NA Chrome5.51.616.8 NA Selenium54.90.63143.5 NA Antimony85.5.82272.8 NA Copper2.90.1112.5 NA Zinc3.40.312.5 NA

44. Waihi Gold Membrane Plant 240 m3/h Membrane Plant Permeate Storage Prior to Discharge

45. Important Operating Parameters Turbidity Feed TDS Permeate TDS Feed Pressure Delta P ORP Permeate Pressure or Flow High Level Alarm High Level Shut-down Low Inlet Pressure Stop & High Pressure Alarm High Level Alarm High Level Shut-down High Pressure Stop & High Flow Stop (and Alarm)

46. Tapered Array for Primary System 9 Vessels In Parallel 5 Vessels In Parallel 1 st Stage 2 nd Stage 120 m3/h 30 m3/h 90 m3/h Ave 22.2 l/m2/h (l-m-h) Exit Volume From Each 6 m3/h

47. Tapered Array for Concentrator System 2 Vessels In Parallel 1 Vessel 1 st Stage 2 nd Stage 30 m3/h 15 m3/h Per vessel 15 m3/h Ave 22.2 l/m2/h (l-m-h) High Exit Velocity Less Fouling Exit Volume15 m3/h

48. Water Quality for Selected Ions of Interest Based on System Performance IonFeedPermeateConcentrate Discharge Limit µg/l (ppb) pH9.510.58.7 6.0-9.0 CN WAD690144720 NA Arsenic5021.5 NA Chrome5.51.616.8 NA Selenium54.90.63143.5 NA Antimony85.5.82272.8 NA Copper2.90.1112.5 NA Zinc3.40.312.5 NA

49. Waihi Gold Membrane Plant 240 m3/h Membrane Plant Permeate Storage Prior to Discharge

50. Oil & Gas Experiences

51. Case studies Shell Refinery – oily waste water treated and discharged Coal Bed Methane Produced Water, 2500 bbls/day discharged to the environment Husky Oil Produced Water re-used as flood water SAGD Produced Water re-used as steam make-up Produced Water from Gas direct discharge Frac-Flowback Barnett Shale re-used as Frac make-up High-TDS Bakken Produced Water for re-use

52. Shell Oil Refinery surface waste water system

53. Coal Bed Methane produced water process

54. Husky Oil produced water Hydrophilic UF – Process Overview

55. Current SAGD Process – low- quality steam generator make- up and high blow-down volumes & sludge

56. SAGD Membrane Process – 3-pass RO Permeate for boiler feed

57. Bench test results: 85°C Feed 2600 mg/L –Ca..............6.3 mg/L –Mg.............1.63 mg/L –Silicon.......66 mg/L –Fe.............. 1.5 mg/L –TDS............2500 mg/L –TOC............293 mg/L Permeate 24 mg/L –Ca…………...45 mg/L –Mg…………. [undetectable] –Silicon…….1.8 mg/L –Fe………….. [undetectable] –TDS…………24 mg/L –TOC………..12.5 mg/L

58. Membrane SAGD Process Eliminate Hot Lime, new Steam Generation option, high recovery <5-10% blow-down

59. Gas Well produced water Produced Water from a Devon Energy natural gas production facility in New Mexico Water temperature: 130-140°F Capacity: 7500 GPD Operational for 12 months

60. Produced Water – 3-pass membrane process (UF, NF, RO)

61. Lab test results: Ultra- filtration process Feed –Ca………………. 632 mg/L –Mg……………… 68 mg/L –Sodium………. 3137 mg/L –Sulfate……….. 2907 mg/L –Chlorides……. 3915 mg/L –pH………………. 5.95 –TDS…………….. 10,833 mg/L –Cond*………... 16,400 µm hos –TOC……………. 29 mg/L –Oil & Grease. 80 ppm Permeate –Ca………………. 576 mg/L –Mg……………… 148 mg/L –Sodium………. 3201 mg/L –Sulfate……….. 2944 mg/L –Chlorides……. 4118 mg/L –pH………………. 6.33 –TDS…………….. 11,158 mg/L –Cond*………... 16,700 µm hos –TOC……………. 11.9 mg/L –Oil & Grease. [undetected]

62. Lab test results: Nano-filtration process Feed –Ca………………. 632 mg/L –Mg……………… 148 mg/L –Sodium………. 3137 mg/L –Sulfate……….. 2944 mg/L –Chlorides……. 4118 mg/L –pH………………. 6.33 –TDS…………….. 11,158 mg/L –Cond*………... 16,700 µm hos –TOC……………. 11.9 mg/L –Oil & Grease. [undetected] Permeate –Ca………………. 98 mg/L –Mg……………… 16 mg/L –Sodium………. 3201 mg/L –Sulfate……….. 50 mg/L –Chlorides……. 3976 mg/L –pH………………. 6.43 –TDS…………….. 6,835 mg/L –Cond*………... 12,050 µm hos –TOC……………. 7.71 mg/L –Oil & Grease. N/A

63. Lab test results: Reverse Osmosis process Feed –Ca………………. 98 mg/L –Mg……………… 16 mg/L –Sodium………. 3201 mg/L –Sulfate……….. 50 mg/L –Chlorides……. 3976 mg/L –pH………………. 6.43 –TDS…………….. 6,835 mg/L –Cond*………... 12,050 µm hos –TOC……………. 7.71 mg/L Permeate –Ca………………. 10 mg/L –Mg……………… 0 mg/L –Sodium………. 339 mg/L –Sulfate……….. 3 mg/L –Chlorides……. 483 mg/L –pH………………. 6.39 –TDS…………….. 933 mg/L –Cond*………... 1,690 µm hos –TOC……………. 2.85 mg/L

64. Projected Energy Costs – 24,000 bbl/day (3,790 m 3 /d) Cost for a 3-pass system$ 1.85M USD Total Energy – 720 hp$ 0.0422/bbl –Based on an electric cost of $0.08/kwh USD (equal to $0.317 m 3 /d) Operating Costs$ 0.08/bbl –Membranes, chemicals, etc. – estimated

65. Frac-Flowback Scope –MDS will provide an Membrane Separation plant to process 4,000 bbl/day of frac-flowback water –MDS will build, own, operate and maintain plant for 3-year period Objectives –Continuous treatment of 4,000 bbl/day of frac-flowback water –Production of 3,400 bbl/day of final permeate water Low chloride, TDS & TOC levels –Production of 600 bbl/day of final concentrate water Low hardness & TOC levels, high chloride & TDS levels Concentrate to deep well injection, evaporation pond Overall water recovery: 85% (3,400 bbl/day from 4,000 bbl/day)

66. MDS Process Plant Water Balance

67. Pretreatment – an Important Component Pretreatment of feed water is important in order to minimize membrane fouling and ensure consistent plant performance –3-stage pretreatment process Induced Gas Flotation (IGF): removes bulk oils, polymers and suspended solids – Reduces insoluble oil and suspended solids from ~200 ppm to ~20 ppm Walnut Shell Filtration (WSF): polishing removal of oils, polymers and suspended solids – Reduces insoluble oil and suspended solids from ~20 ppm to ~2 ppm Ultra-filtration (UF): 0.01 µm pore size for final polishing of oils, polymers and suspended solids –No additional solids generated

68. Frac-Flowback Plant Process Flow Diagram

69. What makes MDS Systems Design Unique? Special membranes and element construction Special system design Special operating procedures based on intimate knowledge of the installation’s water Special cleaning procedures 28 years of process membrane systems experience Not just another bench test result – commercial applications running daily at significant volumes