1. Air Quality and SIP Update Ohio EPA DAPC Air Program Workshop December 7, 2010 Robert Hodanbosi, Chief, DAPC Jennifer Hunter, Manager, DAPC SIP Section

2. Ohio’s Attainment Status  The entire state is attainment for ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and carbon monoxide…for now.  Ohio has nonattainment areas for PM2.5 and lead.

3. Revising Standards  U.S. EPA has been busy revising standards:  2006: 24-hr PM 2.5  2008: Lead  2010: NO 2, SO 2, Ozone  More to come:  2011: CO, PM 2.5 PM 2.5 Ozone SO 2 NO 2

4. PollutantCurrent NAAQS Proposed NAAQS Final DateDesignationsSIPs DueAttainment CO9ppmv (8Hr) 35ppmv (1hr) Oct 2010May 2011 Lead0.15 ug/m3 (rolling 3-month) 5/20/0810/15/08Dec 2010 (round 1) Jan 2012( round 2) July 2012 July 2013 Jan 2016 Jan 2017 NO20.053 ppmv (annual) 0.100 ppmv (1-hr) 6/29/091/22/10Jan 2012 (unclassifiable) Jan 2016/17 (nonattainment) July 2013Jan 2021/22 PM2.515.0 ug/m3 (annual) 35 ug/m3 (24 hr) Nov 20101997 2006 Dec 2004 Oct 2009 April 2008 Dec 2012 Apr 2010 Apr 2015 Ozone0.075 ppmv (8-hr) 0.08 ppmv (8-hr) 0.12 ppmv (1-hr) 0.060-0.07 ppmv (8-hr) 7-15ppmv-hr (secondary) (01/06/10) ~12/31/10Dec 2011Feb 20142014-2031 SO230 ppbv (annual) 140 ppbv (24-hr) 50-100 ppbv (1-hr) (11/16/09) 6/2/10Jun 2012Feb 2014Summer 2017 Revised Standards …attainment will change

5. Revised Standards …implementation will strain recourses

6. OZONE

7. Ozone Air Quality Standard TimelineLevel (ppm)Measurement Revision of New Standard 0.060 -0.070Average of fourth highest concentration measured over a three year period New Standard0.075 Old standard0.084 Old, Old standard0.125Not to be exceeded more than four times in a three year period

8. Ozone Monitors in Ohio

9. Ozone Exceedances by Year (through October 1, 2010) Year0.0125 ppm 1-hr 0.08 ppm 8-hr 0.075 ppm 8-hr 0.075 ppm 8-hr exceedance days 20001135 32633 20012250 73855 200222801143665 200322204 45840 2004None 25 17830 20055192 68865 2006None 39 23639 2007None110 54159 2008None 32 17126 2009None 4 3111 2010None 20 16332

11. Important Dates – Eight-Hour Ozone Standard (0.08 ppm)  June 14, 2004 – Nonattainment areas become effective for the eight-hour ozone standard  June 15, 2007 – Ozone SIPs were due for all areas  June 2009 – Attainment date for all areas (except Cleveland)  June 2010 – Attainment date for Cleveland area  Moved forward with some rules – consumer products, AIM coatings, portable fuel containers

12. 8-Hour Ozone (0.084 ppm) Full Attainment ….

13. Attainment for Key Areas AreaDesign ValueRedesignation PPMYearsSubmittedApproved Columbus842006-20083/17/099/15/09 Cleveland842006-20083/17/099/15/09 Cincinnati822007-200912/14/095/11/10

14. “New” Ozone standard. “New”  On March 13, 2008, U. S. EPA announced a revised ozone standard of 0.075 ppm, average of the fourth highest concentration over a three year period  On September 16, 2009, U.S. EPA announced a review of the basis of the 0.075 ppm standard  On January 6, 2010, U.S. EPA proposed a new standard in the range of 0.060 to 0.070 ppm  On August 23, 2010, U.S. EPA announced a delay in the release of the new standard  November 1, 2010, U.S. EPA announced another delay  New deadline is December 31, 2010. “Revised New”

15. Ohio Ozone 2008-2010 Truncated values through October 11, 2010 08-10 by County 76 to 100 71 to 75 66 to 70 61 to 65 0 to 60

16. Impact of the “New” Standard  0.075 ppm Standard  Not being met in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus, Youngstown and Marietta  0.070 ppm Standard  ++ Toledo, Steubenville, Dayton, and Lima  All monitors in the State exceeding except two in the Dayton area (2 of 49)  0.065 ppm Standard  +++ The two Dayton monitors exceeding  0.060 ppm Standard  ++++ Nothing left * based on 2007-2009 data

17. The moving target ….. Obstacles in implementation  Litigation takes place and disrupts the schedule.  The targeted level and schedule changes.  U.S. EPA proposed to shorten the implementation schedule affecting the time States need to plan…. Approximately 4 months instead of 1 year for State designation recommendations. Attainment demonstrations within 28 months of designations rather than 36.  U.S. EPA didn’t meet their August 31, 2010 goal….now what happens to the schedule? Depends on US EPA implementation rules which are to be proposed with final standard:  How much time we will have to attain?  What will the thresholds be for classification?

18. What will be the schedule for the “new revised” 8-hour standard?  December 2010 – Standard promulgated  May 2011 (??)– State recommends nonattainment areas  December 2011 (??)– US EPA finalizes nonattainment designations  April 2014 (??) – Attainment demonstrations due  Jan 2014(??) – Attainment date for basic areas  Jan 2015(??) – Attainment date for marginal areas  Jan 2018 (??) – Attainment date for moderate areas

19. Ability to attain the new standard?  Preliminary projections with CAIR (of 53 monitors modeled) *attainment date: 2014-2031 Will CAA required controls be enough? Probably not. Level (ppm)Number of monitors exceeding level in 2018 0.07011 of 53 0.06534 of 53 0.06051 of 53

20. Requirements for Ozone Areas - CAA Emission inventory due in 2 yrs; requirements for emission statements due in 2 yrs; periodic inventories RACT corrections due in 6 months; I/M corrections, immediately New Source Review (NSR) program due 2 years (corrections to existing, also) Plan for 15% VOC reduction within 6 years is due in 3 years RACT: Existing & future CTG’s & RACT on major sources (existing due in 2 years) Stage II gasoline vapor recovery due in 2 years Basic I/M (if not already required) due immediately Demonstration of attainment in 4 years Plan for 3% annual average reductions due in 4 years Enhanced I/M due in 2 years Clean fuel program due in 4 years (if applicable) VMT demonstration due in 6 years (TCM program if needed) Specific NSR requirements for modifications to existing sources Measures to offset VMT growth (108(f) measures) due in 2 yrs Contingency measures if miss milestone Requirement for fee on major sources if fail to attain No waivers from 15% or 3% reduction requirements Clean fuels requirement for boilers (plan in 3 years) Traffic controls during congested periods Marginal Moderate Serious Severe Extreme

21. PM 2.5

22. PM2.5 Air Quality Standard  Annual standard – 15 ug/m3, averaged over a three year period  24-hour standard- 65 ug/m3 (old), 35 ug/m3 (new)  Anticipate new review with possible revised standards by October 2011.

23. Annual PM2.5 (15.0 ug/m3)

24. Annual Standard Air Quality Trends Standard 15.0 ug/m3 Attaining!!!

25. 24-Hr PM2.5 (35 ug/m3)

26. 24-Hr Standard Air Quality Trends Standard 35 ug/m3 Almost attaining!!!

27. Annual PM2.5 Attainment  PM2.5 Annual attainment demonstration, based on CAIR, submitted July 16, 2008. Modeling showed all but one area would attain by the 2010 attainment date…used Weight-of- Evidence approach for Cleveland-Akron area.  No additional controls beyond CAA requirements were necessary.  All areas attaining based on 2007-2009 data.  Submitted Clean Data request on April 1, 2010.

28. Annual PM2.5 Redesignation Process  Preparing redesignation requests for all areas except Canton (*did not meet criteria)  CAIR remanded December 23, 2008 U.S. EPA said no PM2.5 redesignations that rely on CAIR until CAIR fix in place.  July 6, 2010, U.S. EPA proposed a replacement to the CAIR program, the Transport Rule.

29. Annual PM2.5 Redesignation Process U.S. EPA new position on redesignations: Move forward on those that don’t rely on CAIR/Transport Rule for maintenance.  Columbus  Dayton CAN propose other redesignations that rely on CAIR/Transport rule but can’t go final until Transport Rule is final (~spring 2011)  Cincinnati, Huntington-Ashland, Parkersburg- Marietta, Wheeling, Steubenville, Cleveland.  In these areas we can’t show attainment or maintenance without CAIR like we did for ozone.

30. Attaining the 24-Hr PM2.5 Standard  Designations December 14, 2009. Only three areas designated nonattainment: Cleveland-Akron Canton (showed attainment but did not meet 75% capture) Steubenville (due to WV monitor)  SIPs due December 2012.  Initial modeling, with CAIR, shows only Cleveland will not meet the standard by 2015 with current controls. Will likely use weight-of–evidence again.

31. Attaining the 24-Hr PM2.5 Standard: Cleveland  Local issue (“flats”): Seven county nonattainment area even though only 3 monitors in Cleveland have shown nonattainment.  PM2.5 RACT may be necessary.

32. Clean Air Transport Rule

33. Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)  US EPA developed rules called Clean Air Interstate Rules (CAIR) to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) from power plants in the eastern US Helps reduce ozone and PM and reduces visibility impairment  Ohio has many coal-fired power plants and is a large emitter of NOx and SO2  CAIR was going to require substantial emission reductions across eastern US and Ohio  CAIR remanded December 23, 2008

34. Clean Air Transport Rule (CATR)  July 6, 2010, U.S. EPA proposed a replacement to the CAIR program, the Transport Rule.  Should provide greater reductions than CAIR. Necessitate year-round operation of existing SCR, SNCR and scrubbers. Necessitate addition of pre-combustion NOx controls Necessitate installation of new scrubbers for many sources.  Expected to be finalized by Spring 2011 to allow NO x and SO 2 reductions in 2012 and further SO 2 reductions in 2014.

35. SO2 Transport SO2 CAIR Transport CAIR CAIR vs. CATR Reductions (tons) NOx Annual NOx Ozone

36. Ohio EGU CATR Budgets vs Historical Emissions (tons) Budgets Historic **CATR would produce substantial emission reductions in Ohio 20122014 NOx Ozone 40,661- NOx Annual 97,313- SO2 464,964 178,307 20052009 NOx Ozone 51,87536,076 NOx Annual 254,45298,780 SO2 1,085,485600,689

37. Lead

38. Lead Standard  Revised October 15, 2008 – from 1.5 ug/m3 to 0.15 ug/m3 as a rolling 3-year monthly average.  Two rounds – existing monitors and expanded monitoring network based on modeling potential violations from stationary sources.  Designations from first round will be effective December 31, 2010. All areas are partial counties: Fulton County – City of Delta area – Bunting Bearings Facility Cuyahoga County – area surrounding Ferro Corporation Logan County – south of City of Bellefontaine – Daido Facility (shutdown)  Four new sites added for second round…..so far no monitored violations at the new sites.  Second round designations due January 16, 2010: Draft for public comment November 4, 2010 No new nonattainment areas

39. Lead Standard – Ferro “Situation”  Cleveland – has processes that use 98% lead (lead oxide) powder.  Highest three month average from 2005-2009 is 0.173 ug/m3.  2010 – spikes surface between January and March: 2.57 ug/m3, 1.39 ug/m3, 0.78 ug/m3  Looking at other potential sources located near the monitor (scrap yards)  Investigating Ferro operations in detail.  Attainment demonstration due July 2012.  Attainment date ~January 2016

40. Nitrogen Dioxide

41. New Standard – NO2  New standard effective April, 12, 2010.  The annual primary standard remains the same at 53 ppb  An annual 1-Hour standard is added: 100 ppb, which is met when the three year average of annual 98 th percentile values are less than or equal to 100 ppb

42. Ohio Attaining…for now  Currently three areas monitored in Ohio (Athens, Cincinnati and Cleveland) show attainment. Highest 3-year averages between 2002 and 2009 are 66 ppb in Cincinnati and 72 ppb in Cleveland  Only county that currently fails is Cook Co., Illinois (Chicago), monitor next to bus stop.  Expanded monitoring network requires two types of monitors: Area wide (community) where CBSAs > 1,000,000 Near roadway where CBSAs > 500,000  Monitoring plan due by July 2012 and network established by January 2013.

43. Monitors needed in Ohio City2008 Population Road Monitors Community Monitors Current Monitors* Akron698,553100 Cincinnati2,155,137111 Cleveland2,088,291111 Columbus1,773,120110 Dayton836,544100 Toledo649,104100 Youngstown565,947100

44. NO2 Timeline  States submit nonattainment recommendations based on current monitors by January 22, 2011 Draft for public comment November 18, 2010 All areas unclassifiable until new monitors in place  Final designations by USEPA January 22, 2012  After other monitors are installed and three years of data collected (2013-2015), additional designations will occur.  Attainment demonstration due July 22, 2013  Attainment date ~January 2017

45. NSR Issues  For permits issued by states with SIP-approved programs, permits issued on or after April 12, 2010 must contain compliance demonstration for 1-hour NO 2 NAAQS  Although this effort appears to be mobile source driven, stationary sources are quickly being pulled in  Modeling shows emergency generators exceed standard  Two sources that emit only 7 lb/hr combined with 65 foot stacks, just meet standard

46. Sulfur Dioxide

47. New Standard – SO2  New standard effective August 23, 2010.  Old Standard – 140 ppb – 24 hour average.  New Standard– 75 ppb – 1 hour average.  Requires expanded monitoring network based on population: 3 monitors in CBSAs >1,000,000 2 monitors in CBSAs >100,000<100,000 1 monitors in CBSAs >5,000  Monitoring plan due by July 2011 and network established by January 2013.

48. Ohio Currently not Attaining  Counties measuring above 75 ppb (2007- 2009): Belmont (97 ppb) Columbiana (117 ppb) Jefferson (129 ppb) Lake (175 ppb) Meigs (85 ppb) Morgan (216 ppb)

49. Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations 4 th high averages 2007-2009 2007-2009 101-300 ppb 76-100 ppb 0-75 ppb

50. Monitors needed in Ohio AreaPWEIMonitors Needed Monitors in Area* Cincinnati532,72822-OH, 1-KY Cleveland299,23026 Marietta36,72510-OH, 1-W Va. Steubenville27,66011-OH, 7-W Va. Columbus24,96510 Wheeling, WVa.22,28211-OH, 1-W Va. Toledo18,90110 Point Pleasant10,37210 Dayton9,90210 Akron9,06612 *The monitors in the area now are not necessarily properly located to fulfill the requirements

51. Dispersion Modeling– SO2 Requires dispersion modeling to identify sources with potential to violate standard.  Threshold somewhere around 100 TPY. Based on the 2008 inventory, Ohio has 221 sources emitting >100 TPY (actual emissions).  139 non-EGUs and 82 EGUs Will assist with nonattainment designations:  Nonattainment = monitored or modeled violations  Attainment = monitored and modeled “no” violations  Unclassifiable = all other areas

52. SO2 Timeline  States submit nonattainment recommendations by June 2011  Final designations by USEPA June 2012  After other monitors are installed and data collected, additional designations will occur.  Basic plan (e.g. “maintenance”) due June 2013 Implementation plan for attainment and unclassifiable areas; includes:  Need for all modeling to be done so those with proven attainment can have plans developed.  Any required regulations be in place (e.g., limits necessary for attainment area sources).  Attainment demonstration for nonattainment areas due February 2014.  Attainment date ~August 2017.

53. The End