Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Co-Matrix™ Filters for Electrolyte Filtration SpinTek Filtration, Inc. Delkor South America Ltd.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Co-Matrix™ Filters for Electrolyte Filtration SpinTek Filtration, Inc. Delkor South America Ltd."— Presentation transcript:

1 Co-Matrix™ Filters for Electrolyte Filtration SpinTek Filtration, Inc. Delkor South America Ltd.

2 Organic Recovery

3 SpinTek Installations  CVRD USINA, Brazil129 m 3 /hr  Chelopech, Bulgaria225 m 3 /hr  Gaby, Chile 1,400 m 3 /hr  Kansanshi Copper, Zambia 494 m 3 /hr  BHP-Billiton (Escondida), Chile 1,700 m 3 /hr  Spence, Chile 2,400 m 3 /hr  Goro Nickel, New Caledonia 1,750 m 3 /hr

4 SpinTek Installations  Skorpion Zinc, Nambia 700 m 3 /hr  Nkana Leach, Zambia 145 m 3 /hr  Mufulira, Zambia 145 m 3 /hr  Sable Zinc, Zambia 100 m 3 /hr  Gunpowder, Australia 400 m 3 /hr  Toquepala, Peru 825 m 3 /hr

5 Dual-Media Filters

6 SX Dual-Media Filter

7 Gunpowder

8 CoMatrix Filter

9 CoMatrix ™ Electrolyte Filter Design Operation – 60m3/hr.m2

10 Operation

11 Aqueous Filtered Aqueous Service Mode Filter Service Flow Anthracite Garnet Packing

12 Aqueous Organic Purge Organic Purge Filter Organic Purge Anthracite Garnet Packing

13 Coalescing Droplets on Matrix Plate Surface

14 Air Aqueous Recovery Feed Evacuation Filter Feed Evacuation Anthracite Garnet Packing

15 Water Inlet Vent Water Fill Step Filter Water Fill Anthracite Garnet Packing

16 Air Outlet Air Inlet Air Scour Step Filter Air Scour Anthracite Garnet Packing

17 Backwash Outlet Water Inlet Backwash Step Filter Backwash Anthracit e Garnet Packing

18 Aqueous Filtered Aqueous Service Mode Filter Service Flow Anthracite Garnet Packing

19 Technical Comments  Process Design considers 12 hour cycle  Mechanical Design considers the filters rated at 350 kPa.  Operating Costs for CoMatrix will be lower, value depends on backwash Operating Costs Operating Costs  Coalescing Plates not considered a consumable. Some extra cost added into Capital Spares (see op cost tables)

20 Organic Recovery To Recover - Entrained Organic solution from the electrolyte prior to Electro-winning Entrained Organic defined as droplets of organic solution not miscible in the aqueous portion Current technology considers the use of  Column Flotation  Coalescers  SX Dual Media Filters This presentation reviews the electrolyte filtration step in the organic recovery process.

21 Design Concept l Anthracite bed holding capacity defined in kg organic per m 2 anthracite bed surface l Anthracite load bearing capacity defines filter capacity l Coalescing plates take out part of the organic load l Less organic load on anthracite bed means »Longer cycles without backwash »Higher feed rates for the same cycle »Higher organic content in feed

22 Feed Flow of 1800m 3 /hr Dual Media – Design Base - 12 m 3 /hr. m 2 l 150m2 of Filter Area l 10 x 4.6m (15’) diameter DM Filters CoMatrix – Design Base - 60 m 3 /hr. m 2 l 30m2 of Filter Area l 3 x 3.6m (12’) diameter Filters

23 CoMatrix Benefits o Smaller Foot Print, less instruments, less valves, piping, controls etc. o Lower Capital Cost o Lower Operating Cost »Less Filter Media »Backwash Water Consumption 6lt per m3 Electrolyte »Dual Media Backwash Consumption +- 19lt per m3 Electrolyte o Can accept higher Organic in Feed Stream – if lower design rates used

24 Industrial Scale Pilot Plant Trials Objectives: o Compare Operation of CoMatrix Design to standard Dual Media Design Test Runs – Oxide Cu Leach Plant in Chile o Dual Media ran at design Rate – 12 m 3 /hr.m 2 o CoMatrix ran at: 3 x DM Filtration Rate - 36 m 3 /hr.m 2 4 x DM Filtration Rate - 48 m 3 /hr.m 2 5 x DM Filtration Rate - 60 m 3 /hr.m 2

25 Industrial Scale Pilot Plant Trials Measurements o Operating Time – in service o Backwash Time – out of service o Flow Rates o Pressure drops during in and out of service operations Pilot Equipment o 0.05m 2 CoMatrix Filter x 3mts high + filter media, CoMatrix packs, valves, PLC etc.

26 Results 3 x DM Filtration Rate Dual Media

27 Results 4 x DM Filtration Rate Dual Media

28 Results 5 x DM Filtration Rate Dual Media Organic Break Through after 8 hours

29 CoMatrix Installations Anglo Base Metals - Skorpion Loaded Electrolyte Filters Raffinate & HCl Solution Filters

30 Escondida Low Grade Sulphide Project l 4 x 4.11m dia CoMatrix l 480-625 m3/hr flow to each filter – 1880 m3/hr total l Original project contemplated 8 x 4.72m Dual Media Filters l 60 ppm inlet organic, 2 ppm outlet

31 Escondida Low Grade Sulphide Project l Start up – June / July 2006 l Initial problems with services and automated sequence l Initial Data sketchy. 2 to 3ppm organic and 1 to 3ppm inorganics at design flow @ 12 hour cycles

32 BHP Billiton Spence l 6 x 3.81m dia CoMatrix l 420-470 m3/hr flow to each filter – 2500 m3/hr total l Original project contemplated 12 x 4.57m Dual Media Filters l 100 ppm inlet organic, 2 ppm outlet

33 BHP Billiton Spence

34 GRACIAS – THANK YOU


Download ppt "Co-Matrix™ Filters for Electrolyte Filtration SpinTek Filtration, Inc. Delkor South America Ltd."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google