1. Relationships between fish predators and prey Bottom up Richer systems have higher productivity at all trophic levels Enrichment usually increases the biomass of the top trophic level in the web and their prey’s prey. (example: Fertilization to enhance sockeye salmon) Top down Predators usually reduce the biomass of their prey And cause changes in the structure of prey communities Lake Michigan example Bottom-up effect: Reductions in fish biomass usually accompany reductions in nutrient loading

2. Hrbacek (1964) Brooks and Dodson (1966) Generally in lakes where zooplanktivorous fish are the top trophic level there is reduced zooplankton biomass, & shift in community compositon toward smaller species and species with more effective defenses Similar effects have been noted in benthic invertebrate communities. Top-down effects of zooplanktivorous fish on zooplankton communities

3. Original Lake Michigan Food web Phtoplankton Benthic algae Aquatic macrophytes &detritus Benthos& zooplankton Lake trout Trophic position 4-4.5 Offshore food chainInshore food chain sedimentation “Once upon a time”

4. Changes in the Lake Michigan Food web during the 60’s Top-down cascade Phtoplankton Benthic algae Aquatic macrophytes &detritus Benthos& zooplankton Lake trout Trophic position 4-4.5 Offshore food chainInshore food chain sedimentation Lamprey wipes out lake trout Alewife invades and outcompetes other zooplanktivores; becomes very abundant Large zooplankton decimated Algal blooms Transparency drops Mysis very abundant Reduction of littoral zone

5. Phylum Chordata—animals with a notochord, gill clefts and a dorsal nerve cord at some stage of their life, most species with sexual reproduction (dioecious) SubPhylum Vertebrata—animals with a vertebral column Class Agnatha—jawless vertebrates Family Petromyzontidae—lampreys Naked (no scales) eel-like body, no bones Jawless mouth with a circular sucking disc with rasping teeth Dorsal and caudlal fins but no paired fins, 7 gill openings, no gill covers, single median nasal opening between eyes. Adult lampreys 0.3-0.8 m long Life cycle—many species anadromous and parasitic—spawn in freshwater, develop into a blind and toothless ammocoetes larva that burrows into mud in streams and lakes--detritivore. Larva 5-30 cm Metamorphosis into a an adult with 1-7 yrs, followed by migration to sea. Adult of most species parastic on marine salmonids—ruptures skin and sucks blood and fluids. Some freshwater species that are not parasitic spawn soon after metamorphosis and die. All adults die after spawning.

6. http://www.aquaticcommunity.com/news/Lamprey-fish.jpg Lake trout with parasitic marine lampreys—Petromyzon marinus

7. Test of the top-down cascade theory: introduce pacific salmon Phtoplankton Benthic algae Aquatic macrophytes &detritus Benthos& zooplankton Offshore food chainInshore food chain sedimentation Alewife declines Large zooplankton recover Algal blooms stop Transparency increases Littoral zone expands Biomanipulation experiment

8. A F1F1 H1H1 H3H3 A2A2 H2H2 F2F2 P1P1 P2P2 Zebra mussel invading a compartmentalized food web: a combination of top-down & bottom-up effects As water clears light reaches the bottom and plants & benthic algae grow Prior to the zebra mussel invasion, the rich nutrient regime allowed the phytoplankton to shade out the littoral zone vegetation

9. Light is a key physical factor— determines the boundaries within which photosynthesis (primary production) can take place Rooted plants cannot grow at depths beyond the light limit. In offshore regions where the bottom is below the photic zone suspended phytoplankton are the main photosynthetic organisms Phytoplankton compete for light with littoral vegetation (macrophytes, epiphytic, and benthic algae) and enrichment by nutrients usually leads to a reduction in the extent of the littoral zone community. Photic zone Light limit

10. Top-down effects. Predators selectively remove vulnerable prey, and make it possible for species and varieties that have better defense mechanisms to win out over faster growing competitors that lack defenses. Prey defense mechanisms Reduced detectability Smaller size, transparency, less turbulence Defensive behaviour Vertical migration and night time activity, and avoidance responses Unpalatability Spines, toxicity Altered life-cycle Diapause and speeding up life-history

11. Example Brooks and Dodson study Shifts toward smaller size in predation impacted communities. Small size can be an effective defense

12. The size efficiency hypothesis Which Daphnia can deplete its food supply the most and still survive on it? Why are larger Daphnia more efficient than smaller Daphnia at filtering even tiny algae? Why do large herbivorous zooplankton dominate communities when there are no zooplanktivores?

13. Reduced visibility/ less pigmentation also works In fishless lakes zooplankton are strongly pigmented, mostly with carotenoid pigments that they obtain from algae In lakes with zooplanktivorous fish, zooplankton are usually nearly transparent and thus very hard for fish to see Why do you think that pigmented zooplankton species and varieties win out over transparent ones in fishless lakes?

15. Defensive behaviour In fishless lakes many invertebrates swim about freely in the water column of both lakes and streams during the daytime Where fish are present, they usually confine such behaviour to the night hours and hide in the bottom during the day.

16. Defensive behaviour: vertical migration The effect of zooplanktivorous fish onvertical migration of herbivorous zooplankton

17. Damselflies in fishless lakes are preyed on heavily by dragonflies The species that live in lakes with fish usually respond to a nearby fish by remaining motionless The species that live in lakes without fish respond to dragonflies and other invertebrate predators by rapidly moving a short distance. McPeek’s studies on the escape response of damselflies Defensive behaviouir: escape responses

18. Spines and other extensions of the body are a good defense against zooplanktivorous fish Daphnia with and without helments Morphological Defenses

19. Fish predators generally avoid zooplankton with large spines Successful species invasions often involve unpalatable species

20. Sticklebacks in fishless lakes have much smaller spines and much fewer Armoured plates Sticklebacks are small fish that are extremely well defended against piscivorous fish—large dorsal spines, pelvic spines, and armoured plates

21. Sunfish have both spines and deep body shape that can exceed most predator’s gape.. As a result, most pumpkinseeds older than 1 or 2 years are rarely preyed upon by pike or bass.

22. Top-down effects. Predators selectively remove vulnerable prey, and make it possible for species and varieties that have better defense mechanisms to win out over faster growing competitors that lack defenses. Prey defense mechanisms Reduced detectability Smaller size, transparency, less turbulence Defensive behaviour Vertical migration and night time activity, and avoidance responses Unpalatability Spines, toxicity Altered life-cycle Diapause and speeding up life-history

23. In completely fishless streams there is usually no difference between day and night drift of invertebrates, but where drift feeding fish are present there is usually a sharp increase in drift at night. The differences seen here (fish/no fish) are a result of consumption depleting the #/m 3 of drifting inverts. Defensive behaviour: night-time drifting in streams

24. Drift net in a small Creek

25. Some common mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera) Invertebrates that commonly occur in the drift

26. Net-spinning caddis larvae (Trichoptera)