1. In the Land Court v’s Hancock Coal Peter Anderson, Grazier Clermont/Alpha brother Paul Anderson, starting pump jack

3. The Process of Protecting a Grazing Operation Outside of the Proposed Mining Operation Objection to EIS No precedence for projects this size Make Good Agreements vs Make Good Provisions Negotiations with the Multi- National and multiple personnel Breakdown of Negotiations Land Court of Queensland- Hancock Coal Pty Ltd v Kelly & Ors and Dept. of Environment and Heritage Protection (No.4) [2014] QLC 12 The decision by Member Smith The fallout and costs, still no MGA

4. Suggestions for amendments to the Water Act The distance from the mining lease where a miner should be required to enter into MGA with Landholders Time Frame for MGA Level of drawdown to trigger MGA Cumulative modelling No landholder should be left in the position of going into the Land Court to seek security over their groundwater hence their business & livelihood

5. “Water is where you find it” The late Neil Anderson, “Glenlea Downs”, Clermont