1. The SLIP Metadata Catalogue Mike Bradford SLIP-EF Business Sponsor Department of Land Information 14 September 2006 © Copyright Department of Land Information, Perth, 2006 The document and its contents are confidential and intended only for use by authorised personnel directly involved in the Shared Land Information Platform or so indicated on the document’s distribution list. The document’s contents should not be disclosed to any unauthorised person.

2. Why a Catalogue? Benefits SLIP-EF Catalogue Services Project  Background  Where Are We Today  By 2007 Challenges & Future Demonstration Agenda

3. Foundation for a spatial data infrastructure A single repository of metadata for Government land and property information; Environment for data custodians to publish their own metadata; Serving data once for multiple purposes; Platform to support OGC Standards; Why a Catalogue?

4. User with Need for Land Information User with Need for Land Information Land Information Provided Land Information Provided Browse Suppliers’ Data Services Search Suppliers’ Data Services Graphically Display Location Display Detailed Metadata Preview Data Online Interactively View Data Registration, Authentication & Authorisation Online Metering Online Delivery Billing and Payment to Data Source Registration, Authentication & Authorisation Online Metering Online Delivery Discover Resource Evaluate Resource Access Resource FreeSubscriptionRestricted

5. Foundation for a spatial data infrastructure A single repository of metadata for Government land and property information; Environment for data custodians to publish their own metadata; Serving data once for multiple purposes; Platform to support OGC Standards; Why a Catalogue?

6. Benefits Increased accessibility and availability – “right data at the right time”; Facilitates better and quicker decisions; Promotes collaboration and sharing of data resources; Facilitates coordinated metadata development to avoid duplication of effort – thus, reduces costs; Promotes data currency and reliability; Reduces data redundancy; Avenue for advertisement of data resources to potential consumers.

7. Background: Based upon COTS product; Working in collaboration with other jurisdictions - Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Water (NRMW) in Queensland and Geoscience Australia. SLIP-EF Catalogue Services Project

8. Where Are We Today: Configuration/customisation of “generic” Consortium version complete; User Acceptance Testing commenced, expected completion end September 2006; Planning and analysis activities to replace the WA Interragator underway.

9. SLIP-EF Catalogue Services Project By 2007: Current WA Interragator replaced with Interragator+ Expected rollout to the wider community planned to commence from January 2007.

10. Challenges Seamless integration with Australian Spatial Data Directory (ASDD); Enhance the user interface of the SLIP Catalogue to improve user experience – e.g. more intuitive; Project has been ‘leading’ the development of supporting standards Reliance on the ANZLIC Metadata project

11. Future Full support for ratified version of ANZLIC Metadata Profile (based on AS/NZS ISO 19115/19139); Support for the ANZLIC Australian Spatial Data Infrastructure (ASDI) initiatives; Enhanced support for the Catalogue Service for Web (CS-W) profile of the OGC Catalogue Service Specifications version 2.0; Support for ebXML Registry Information Model (ebRIM).

12. Demo - SLIP-EF Catalogue Services Demonstration

13. Requestor (eg. Public) Catalogue Service bind find Service Provider (eg. Government Agencies) publish Catalogue Service “Publish-Find-Bind” Model

14. Catalogue Metadata record in XML Metadata Upload – Single record or Batch Upload Administration Process Online form Validation Process Publishing Metadata

15. Review Metadata Approve Metadata Publish Metadata Reject Metadata Publish Metadata Data Custodian Administrators WALIS Office Administrator Publishers Administration Process Data Custodian Agency WALIS Office XML Approval Process XML

16. SLIP Catalogue Service Portal Live Demonstration

17. Off-line Demonstration …in the event of Murphy’s Law, break glass here – this links to the off-line presentation materials

18. Scenario 1 – Publishing of Metadata Records Available modes:  Online form  Upload XML metadata records  Individual metadata record;  Batched metadata records.  Harvesting from specified repositories Demonstration Scenarios

19. Scenario 1 – Online Form Demonstration Scenarios

27. Scenario 1 – Uploading of Metadata Records - Single Metadata Record - Demonstration Scenarios

32. Scenario 1 – Uploading of Metadata Records - Batch Upload - Demonstration Scenarios

37. Scenario 2 – Administration of Publishing Process One administration process for ALL publishing modes; Tools for metadata administration; 2 levels of Administration  Data Custodian Administrator – “Review” process;  WALIS Office Administrator – “Approval” process. Only “Approved” metadata records are published. Demonstration Scenarios – cont’d

44. Scenario 3 – Searching for Metadata Records 2 Search modes  “Simple” search mode;  “Advanced” search mode. Bind search results to view web services (e.g. WMS; WFS)