1. Earthquake recurrence models Are earthquakes random in space and time? We know where the faults are based on the geology and geomorphology Segmentation Classical models Next generation models and tests

2. Burbank and Anderson Basic fault segmentation

3. Fault zone is comprised of heterogeneous non coplanar fault surfaces bounding oblate blocks whose geometry and activity varies in time and space Map view mode II step (bend) Cross- section view mode III step (bend) 3D mixed mode stepover Strong influences on Stress and displacement fields around the fault surfaces Further development and linkage Fluid flow Rupture dynamics Fault zone strength Questions: Geometric—Fault surface and block shapes and sizes Time—How long are they active? What is slip history? Block motion history? Development—Linkage and evolution of roughness

4. Burbank and Anderson

5. Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures (I) Wesnousky, 2006

6. Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures (II) Wesnousky, 2006 “stop light color scheme” About 2/3 rupture terminations are associated with discontinuities or fault ends Step size

7. A. Periodic earthquake model in which stress levels at the time of rupture and after it are known. These yield a predictable time and slip for each earthquake. B. Time-predictable model based on a consistent stress level at which failure occurs. Stress drop and slip magnitude are unpredictable, but given previous slip, time until the next earthquake (with unknown slip) is predictable. C. Slip-predictable model based on a consistent stress level at the end of an earthquake. Given time since the last rupture, magnitude of slip is predictable. Modified after Shimaki and Nakata (1980) Burbank and Anderson

8. 1984 “…individual faults and fault segments tend to generate essentially the same size or characteristic earthquakes having a relatively narrow range of magnitudes near the maximum.”

9. Burbank and Anderson If we know slip rate du/dt And we assume u(x) per event We can get recurrence time u ave or u max per event should also imply length and M

10. Zielke and Arrowsmith, in prep. Modeling earthquake recurrence

11. Past and Future Earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault (I) Weldon, et al., 2004 Weldon, et al., 2005

12. Cartoon of paleoearthquake extent based on (up- to) 2005 event timing (vertical bars) Northern 2/3 and southern 1/3 repeating events Random in time and length Long with a few small events Three recent developments strengthen the hypothesis that the fault breaks in relatively infrequent, large earthquakes: 1)Relatively large slip/event has been documented implying long rupture length (4-7 m = >100km) 2)Dating uncertainty and 3) Event quality uncertainty Current 151 year hiatus not unusual. When it ends, a substantial portion of the fault is likely to rupture either as a single long rupture or a series of overlapping ruptures in a short time interval