1. 1 Regional Partnerships and Multi Agency Information Sharing David Valls-Russell Regional Workstream Leader

2. 2 Within your authority area you already have  Information sharing agreements  Multi Agency working arrangements  Partnerships Hitting the boundary

3. Social Worker Voluntary Worker Youth Offending Team Worker Doctor A&E Health Visitor GP CAMHs worker Housing Officer ASBAT Worker Connexions Worker SENCO Teacher Pupil Referral Unit School Nurse Educational Psychologist

4. EducationSocial Services Health YOT Police Housing Connexions Other Information Hub

5. 5 Within your authority area you already have   Information sharing agreements   Multi Agency working arrangements   Partnerships Do they cover one or several service areas? (think of the savings from shared infrastructure and information governance) Hitting the boundary

6. Single Assessment - Infrastructure EducationSocial Services Health YOT Police Housing Connexions Other Information Hub Information Hub

7. ISA - Infrastructure EducationSocial Services Health YOT Police Housing Connexions Other Information Hub Information Hub     x x  x

8. 8 Within your authority area you already have   Information sharing agreements   Multi Agency working arrangements   Partnerships Do they cover one or several service areas? What happens when the information you need, orthe information you need, or the person who needs information that you havethe person who needs information that you have is on the other side of the departmental / service / authority boundary? Hitting the boundary

9. Social Worker Voluntary Worker Youth Offending Team Worker Doctor A&E Health Visitor GP CAMHs worker Housing Officer ASBAT Worker Connexions Worker SENCO Teacher Pupil Referral Unit School Nurse Educational Psychologist

10. Health Visitor Social Worker Housing Officer Voluntary Worker Youth Offending Team Worker ASBAT Worker Connexions Worker School Nurse Doctor A&E CAMHs worker GP Educational Psychologist Pupil Referral Unit SENCO Teacher

12. Hubs need to talk to other hubs: Federation

13. London Federation

14. Regional National Federation

15. 15 What’s it about? Extending Multi Agency Information Sharing beyond current service and geographical boundaries. Why? To help Local Authorities and their partners  improve service delivery  achieve efficiency savings  better meet Government targets. The Regional Workstream

16. 16 Proof of Concept A generic Proof of Concept document plus a version specifically tailored to each of two multi- agency partnerships in different e-government regions; ie we will model a ‘To Be’ design for each (including draft governance and information sharing protocols). Business Case A generic Business Case plus a worked out version for each of the two partnerships, together with suggestions on benefits realisation and sustainability. What will we produce?

17. FAME Proof of Concept

18. or… ?

20. ? ?

21. 21 Demonstrate convincingly that the multi-service-area, regional, federated FAME concept  is viable  could work in an English sub-region (a grouping of 2 or more English Local Authorities or London Boroughs) with their partner agencies and organisations  would bring significant benefits if implemented What are we hoping to achieve?

22. 22  Free consultancy (~2 FTE) and privileged access to knowledge resources for 3 months  Answers to many questions  Pointers to some solutions  Evidence to help make a decision  Opportunity to effect efficiency gains and savings (some immediate)  Basis for planning What’s in it for the partners?

23. 23 If all goes well…  Evidence that the concept is workable  An argument for sustaining and further developing FAME  An opportunity to support joined-up government, especially with ISA  Justification for past faith and hard work  Feel good! … and for FAME?

24. 24  Willingness – we must have well placed champions!  Readiness – multi agency information sharing already happening within each authority area.  Availability of practitioners, service managers and IT people – on average one person per authority, agency and organisation for up to 1 day per week over 3 months; expenses will be refunded. We’re asking a lot; but long term it could make a big difference. What’s required from the partners?

25. 25  Peer review in another Local Authority / London Borough  Review, challenge and validation by regional or national user group (possibly led by SOCITM)  FAME Regional Workstream Board  FAME Project Board How will the work be validated?

26. 26 December DecemberDetailed planning Identify / engage with partner organisations Programme work for January January JanuaryDraft straw man; prepare workshops Readiness and Practitioner workshops Identify / engage with potential suppliers & others February FebruaryPractitioner workshops First draft issued for consultation Development continues. Workshops March MarchDraft refined Draft for QA Final delivery When will it happen?