Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWill Angevine Modified over 9 years ago
2
Shoreline Management Act approved by voters in the early 1970’s to: – Encourage water-dependent uses – Protect shoreline natural resources – Promote public access Cities and counties required to adopt local “Shoreline Master Programs” – Local programs must be consistent with statute and administrative rules New shoreline guidelines adopted in 2003 – Provide direction to cities and counties for SMP updates
3
Thurston Region SMP Special Area Management Plans – Urban Waterfront – Percival Creek
4
Cities and counties must update their Shoreline Master Programs. – Thurston Regional Planning Council received state funding to prepare a ‘model’ plan for Olympia, Tumwater, and Lacey. Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Shoreline Environmental Designations Cumulative Impact Analysis Restoration Plan Public Access Plan
5
The ‘model’ plan serves as a starting point for Olympia’s update. – Will be refined to address issues that are unique to Olympia Deadline for council adoption – September 2010
6
January/February : Public outreach February – May: ‘Rewrite’ – Planning Commission meetings April 19, May 3, May 17 Subcommittee Involvement May: Release draft for public comment and issue SEPA – Public Workshops June: Planning Commission public hearing July – August: Revisions September: City Council action – Submit approved SMP to Ecology
7
Citizens, tribes, public agencies, interest groups – Shoreline Management Act requires public participation City staff – Conduct public process – Write plan – “Project manager” Planning Commission – Subcommittee – Public Hearing City Council – Approve SMP Public hearing discretionary Department of Ecology – Partner with City during update process – Review SMP after Council approval – Public Hearing – Final ‘approval’
8
No net loss – Mitigation/Restoration Building heights near marine waters and Capital Lake – Visual assessment Bulkheads Park and trail uses near shorelines Nonconforming uses/structures – Change in setback requirements/nonconforming provisions Integration of Urban Waterfront Plan into SMP Integration with Comprehensive Plan update Critical Area Regulations within shorelines Coordination with other jurisdictions Tribal interests Port uses (within 200’)
10
Grass Lake (Rural) – Urban Conservancy Ken Lake (Urban) – Shoreline Residential Percival Creek – Urban Conservancy
11
Chambers Lake (Conservancy) – Urban Conservancy/ Shoreline Residential Ward Lake (Rural) – Shoreline Residential
12
Ken Lake – Existing 20’ – Proposed 25’.
13
Grass Lake – Existing 50’ – Proposed 100’
14
Ward Lake – Existing 50’ – Proposed 75’
15
Chambers Lake – Existing 10’ – Proposed 75’
16
Percival Creek – Varies depending on use
17
Development would need to comply with Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) – Incorporate by reference into SMP
18
Create opportunities for public access: – Chambers Lake Open Space – Grass Lake Refuge – Ward Lake Park
19
Web Links www.imagineolympia.com http://trpc.org/programs/environment/water/smpupdates http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/ index.html City Contact: Cari Hornbein, Senior Planner 360-753-8048 shorelineupdate@ci.olympia.wa.us
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.