Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAddison Bloomfield Modified over 9 years ago
1
Coding of Procedures in Interventional Nephrology: Overview of changes in the 2010 revision
2
Vessel Definitions
3
Central versus Peripheral
The anatomy texts do not contain a definition of central and peripheral veins Central veins Upper - Veins within the boney thorax Lower – Veins within the boney pelvis Peripheral veins Veins of extremity up to central veins
4
Definition of Access The vascular access is considered to be a separate vessel by definition It extends from the arterial anastomosis through to the beginning of the central veins, i.e., the subclavian The arterial anastomosis with the adjacent 2 cm of artery is defined as the arterial portion of the access The entire remainder of the access is defined as the venous portion for coding purposes
5
Coding Changes for 2010 New codes
36147 – Cannulation and access angiogram 36148 – Second cannulation for therapeutic purposes 75791 – Angiogram of access without cannulation Code deletions G0392 – Arterial angioplasty within access G0393– Venous angioplasty within access 36145 – Non-selective cannulation 75790 – Angiogram of access
6
Coding Access Angioplasty
7
New Policy Guidelines In 2006 CMS issued two new G codes take effect on January 1, 2007 Venous angioplasty – G0393 Arterial angioplasty – G0392 These have been discontinued, we are to back to using the old standard codes Venous angioplasty – 35476 Arterial angioplasty
8
Potential Confusion There are special regulations that relate to angioplasty within the access However 35475 and must be used for all angioplasty both outside of and within the access Good documentation is important
9
Multiple Angioplasties
10
Within the Access Situations in which multiple angioplasties may be coded are very limited Although multiple lesions may be present within the access one is permitted to use only a single code If these multiple treatments within the access are all venous, then a single venous angioplasty code, 35476, should be used If both an arterial angioplasty (arterial anastomosis) and a venous angioplasty are performed within the access, only the arterial treatment should be coded using 35475
11
Vessels Outside the Access
Any lesion present within a distinctly separate central venous structure, warrants a separate code Treatment of a lesion within a distinctly separate feeding artery warrants a separate code A separate supervision and interpretation code, (for venous) or (for arterial), should be paired with each of the angioplasty codes The second venous (within the central veins) or arterial angioplasty (within the feeding arteries) should have a -59 modifier attached as should the second venous S&I code The second arterial angioplasty has a different S&I code, 75964
12
Coding Multiple Angioplasties
No more than two angioplasty codes should be used in any case This could be one arterial (for the anastomosis or a feeding artery) and one venous (for a central venous lesion) two venous - one in the access and one central two central and none in the access Two arterial (the anastomosis and a feeding artery, or two feeding artery) Any time two angioplasty codes are used very good documentation should be supplied to explanation the rational for the two codes
13
Contiguous Lesions If a single lesion extends across two adjacent separate vessels, treatment warrants only a single angioplasty code In instances in which the exact anatomical identity of the vessel is critical for coding purposes, a lesion that bridges across two vessels should be defined by the vessel in which it lies predominantly Two codes are warranted only in instances in which separate distinct lesions are present in separate vessels, provided that the two vessels qualify for separate coding based upon the access versus central veins rule as described
14
Changes In Cannulation Codes
15
Basics Cannulation or catheterization may be either selective or non-selective Selective cannulation is a column 1 code and non-selective is a column 2 and these two codes are mutually exclusive The most frequently performed cannulation is non-selective The target vessel is entered directly and no further manipulation is required This cannulation can be performed under two circumstances – Non-selective cannulation to perform an angiogram of the access Non-selective cannulation for a therapeutic intervention With the new regulations, these two procedure types should be coded differently
16
Non-selective cannulation for purposes of an access angiogram
The code is a new code for 2010 This code bundles an angiogram of the access with a non-selective cannulation performed for the purpose of performing the study This code is specific for the dialysis access (either fistula or graft) Not an appropriate code for use when a vein is cannulated as for vein mapping 36145 and have now been discontinued
17
Non-selective cannulation for therapeutic purposes
If a non-selective cannulation of the access is performed for the purpose of performing a therapeutic intervention, another new code, 36148, should be used This would be used for the second cannulation done for a thrombectomy, for example
18
Selective catheterization (cannulation)
A selective catheterization code cannot be used with a nonselective code for the same site The selective code should be treated as a column 1 code and the nonselective as a column 2 code and the two are mutually exclusive Two situations: Only one non-selective cannulation – list only the angiogram (discussed further below) A second nonselective cannulation is performed - this should be dropped in favor of selective code The basic principle is - each time a site is used for a selective catheterization, a non-selective code is dropped in favor of the selective one
19
Restrictions On Selective Catheterization
Only selective catheterization of a first or second order artery is allowed 36215 & (36245 in lower extremity) Selective catheterization of venous side branches is considered to be bundled with 36147 36011 & can not be used
20
Angiogram of Access An angiogram of the access can actually be coded three different ways depending upon the individual situation: Angiogram performed with cannulation Angiogram only Angiogram performed through a pre-existing cannulation of access Separate angiogram of access code without a cannulation code Separate coding of angiogram components
21
Angiogram Performed With Cannulation
Already discussed on slide 16 The code bundles an angiogram of the access with a non-selective cannulation performed for the purpose of performing the study This code is specific for the dialysis access (either fistula or graft) All catheter insertion and manipulation within the access is bundled except as listed for selective catheterization of an artery
22
Codes Bundled With 36147 36145 – Cannulation of access
Angiogram of access Fluoroscopy (separate procedure) up to one hour physician time Venography, extremity, unilateral Venography, caval, inferior, with serialography Venography, caval, superior, with serialography 36140 – Cannulation of extremity artery (excludes brachial) 36010 – Selective catheterization of superior or inferior vena cava
23
Angiogram Only 75791 should be used for an access angiogram when a cannulation is not performed This code should not be used except where the angiogram is being coded without an accompanying non-selective cannulation Angiogram performed through a pre-existing cannulation of access Separate angiogram of access code without a cannulation code
24
Angiogram performed through a pre-existing cannulation of access
Occasionally the patient presents to the angiography suite with a needle or catheter already in place. In this instance, the access does not require cannulation in order to perform the angiogram. In this instance the code would be used for the procedure.
25
Separate angiogram of access code without cannulation code
How can the cannulation code in the bundle be dropped while maintaining the angiogram coding This should be done by listing the angiogram as a separate study using the code 75791 If a second cannulation for therapeutic purpose, code 36148, has been the site of the selective catheterization, it would simply be dropped in favor of the selective code Remember that neither nor can be used together with 75791
26
Separate coding of angiogram components
In order to qualify as a separate procedure and be coded separately, the angiogram must be performed by cannulating a separate site, a site that is not part of the access as defined 75820 or 75827, should be listed with a -59 modifier In this setting should not be coded (no reason) A cannulation for therapeutic purposes may be done
27
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
28
New regulations have been scheduled to begin January 1, 2010
Important that the interventionalist dealing with dialysis access procedures become familiar with these and become accustomed to their application As is always the case there is very likely to be confusion initially before the changes become infused throughout the system
29
A complete copy of the new manual may be obtained from the “Members Only” websites of either ASDIN or RPA Use of uniform coding practices and consistently following a set of standardized recommendations such as those represented in the Coding Manual is very important It is only by doing this that our Society will be able to speak in the future with a strong, unified voice in matters that relate to this very important aspect of our rapidly growing field
30
Illustrative Cases for Coding
31
Tunneled Catheter Placement
There are no changes in coding in this category of procedures
32
Angioplasty of Venous Stenosis
Uncomplicated
33
History 64 year old male Polycystic kidney disease
Dialysis for 5 years Loop graft in left arm Referred for low flow
34
Physical Examination Loop graft in left forearm Hyper-pulsatile
Augmented well Prominent thrill at venous anastomosis High pitched bruit at venous anastomosis, diastolic component diminished
35
Stenosis at anastomosis
36
Draining veins normal
37
Central veins normal
38
SVC normal
39
Graft, anastomosis and artery - normal
40
Angioplasty performed
41
Results of treatment
42
Coding of Case 2009 2010 36147 - Cannulation with angiogram
Angiogram of access G Venous angioplasty S & I for G0393 Cannulation with angiogram 35476 – Venous angioplasty 75978 – S&I for 35476
43
Venous and arterial problem
Angioplasty Venous and arterial problem Case with Venous angioplasty 2 arterial angioplasties Selective catheterization – 2nd order
44
History 48 year old male On hemodialysis for 3 years
Left forearm loop graft Has 10% recirculation Poor flow
45
Examination Left forearm loop graft Augments poorly
Thrill at venous anastomosis
46
Stenosis at venous anastomosis
47
Cephalic normal
48
Central veins normal
49
Angioplasty done with 8 X 4 balloon
Lesion dilated completely with no residual
50
Stenosis of arterial anastomosis
51
Next Step Graft cannulated second time on arterial side
Arterial anastomosis dilated with 6 X 4 balloon
52
Post angioplasty
53
Coding of Case 2009 2010 36145 - Cannulation of graft
Angiogram of graft nd cannulation G0393 , Venous angioplasty G0392 , Arterial angioplasty Arteriogram 36147 – Cannulation and access angiogram 36148 – Second cannulation for therapeutic purposes 35475 , Arterial angioplasty Arteriogram
54
Venous angioplasties and SVC angiogram
Graft With Poor Flow Venous angioplasties and SVC angiogram 3 venous angioplasties Superior vena cava angiogram
55
History 50 year old male with forearm loop graft
Referred for decreased flow Has had previous central venous catheters
56
Physical Examination Graft was hyper-pulsatile
Collateral veins on upper arm and chest
57
Anastomosis stenosis
58
Basilic stenosis
59
Brachiocephalic vein stenosis
60
Next Step After multiple attempts, a guidewire was passed across the innominate lesion A catheter was passed across the lesion Superior vena cava angiogram and angiogram of central veins was performed through catheter
61
Central veins and SVC angiogram
62
Basilic angioplasty with 8 X 4
63
Anastomosis angioplasty with 8 X 4
64
Angioplasty with 12 X 4
65
Post treatment result
66
Inflow Evaluation The flow in the graft as tested with a bolus of radiocontrast appeared to be excellent The graft augmented well Conclusion good inflow
67
Arterial anastomosis
68
Coding of Case 2010 2009 36010 - Selective catheterization of SVC
Angiogram of graft Angiogram of SVC G0393, Venous angioplasty G , nd venous angioplasty 35476 , rd venous angioplasty Cannulation and access angiogram 35476 , Venous angioplasty , nd venous angioplasty
69
Thrombectomy Arterial embolus
70
History The patient is a 47 year old male
Left upper arm straight graft Referred for thrombectomy
72
Stenosis of anastomosis
75
Thrombectomy done in standard manner
No difficulties encountered initially With use of Fogarty patient began to appear uncomfortable Examination revealed that hand was cold and the radial pulse that had been present earlier was now gone
76
Arteriogram Done via catheter inserted into brachial artery – selective catheterization
77
Arterial Embolectomy
78
Coding of Case 2009 2010 36145 - Cannulation 75790 Angiogram of graft
Thrombectomy G0393 , Venous angioplasty Selective catheterization of 1st order artery Arteriogram Embolectomy, brachial 36147 – Cannulation and access angiogram Thrombectomy 35476, Venous angioplasty Selective catheterization of 1st order artery Arteriogram Embolectomy, brachial
79
Juxta-Anastomotic Stenosis
Poor Flow in Fistula Juxta-Anastomotic Stenosis
80
History 48 year old male Radial-cephalic fistula
Fistula is 2 years old History of difficult cannulation Poor flow
81
Physical Examination Radial-cephalic fistula in right arm
Poorly palpable in upper portion Did not augment very well Apparent juxta-anastomotic stenosis
82
Initial Angiogram
83
Angioplasty #1
84
Angioplasty #2
85
Post - angioplasty
86
Coding of Case 2009 2010 75790 - Angiogram of fistula
G0392 , Arterial angioplasty G0393 , Venous angioplasty 36215 – selective catheterization of 1st order artery Arteriogram of extremity Angiogram of access without cannulation 35475, – Arterial angioplasty 36215 – selective catheterization of 1st order artery Arteriogram of extremity
87
Poor Development of Fistula
Accessory vein
88
History 32 year old male Fistula created 6 months earlier
Fistula used for two months Very difficult to cannulate
89
Physical Examination Radial-cephalic fistula
High anastomosis Strong thrill at anastomosis Fistula not palpable above mid humerus level Low accessory vein apparent by physical exam
90
Catheter across anastomosis
91
Angiogram of accessory vein
92
Coil in place
93
Radiocontrast through catheter in accessory vein
94
Final angiogram
95
Coding of Case 2009 2010 75790 – Angiogram of access
36011 – Selective catheterization of first order vein 37204 – Placement of embolization coil Radiological S & I for 37204 75898 – Follow-up angiogram for coil embolization 36147 – Cannulation and access angiogram 37204 – Placement of embolization coil Radiological S & I for 37204 75898 – Follow-up angiogram for coil embolization
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.