Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCael Smythers Modified over 9 years ago
1
Balancing the Technology and Economics of Farm Energy Needs
Connecticut Farm Energy Conference Legislative Office Building Hartford, Connecticut November 5, 2013 Richard A. Peterson NATC
2
A General Look at Energy use in Agriculture
Agriculture is Energy Dependent Primary Energy Drivers Electricity Diesel Fuel/Gasoline/Biofuels Fuel Oil/Natural Gas/Propane Solar/Wind/Methane/Biomass/Other Renewables Richard A. Peterson NATC
3
Richard A. Peterson NATC
Uses of Energy on Farms Soil preparation Planting Crop Care Commodity Harvest Materials Handling/On Farm Processing Environmental Control/Livestock Comfort Storage Systems Lighting Heating Transportation Richard A. Peterson NATC
4
Current Farm Energy Consumption
Direct energy – diesel, gasoline, LP gas, natural gas, and electricity Indirect energy – fertilizers and pesticides Source: Prof. John Miranowski, Iowa State University Richard A. Peterson NATC
5
Breakdown of Farm Energy Use Across the US
Source: Prof. John Miranowski, Iowa State University Richard A. Peterson NATC
6
Richard A. Peterson NATC
Source: Prof. John Miranowski, Iowa State University Richard A. Peterson NATC
7
Richard A. Peterson NATC
Source: Prof John Miranowski, Iowa State University Richard A. Peterson NATC
8
Richard A. Peterson NATC
Source: Prof John Miranowski, Iowa State University Richard A. Peterson NATC
9
Is Farm Energy Use Increasing?
Agricultural production is growing at an average rate of 2% per year However, Energy inputs have remained relatively flat over the last 30 years Farm operators have increased energy efficiency Richard A. Peterson NATC
10
A quick look at Connecticut agriculture
Farm numbers have increased by 733 farms or 17.5% between 2002 and 2007. Farm acreage has increased 13.6% in that same 5 year period However, the average acreage per farm is down slightly The total value of farm commodities has increased 17.2% between 2002 and 2007 Source: Census of Agriculture Richard A. Peterson NATC
11
Richard A. Peterson NATC
The Top 9 of 25 Connecticut Ag Commodities Represent more than 76% of total commodity value Greenhouse/Nursery % Dairy % Chicken (eggs) % Aquaculture (clams & oysters) 3.2% Sweet Corn % Cattle and calves % Apples % Tobacco % Hay % 76.2% Richard A. Peterson NATC
12
Richard A. Peterson NATC
How can Connecticut Farm Operators Assess and Improve Energy Efficiency? Get an energy audit (conducted by agricultural professionals) Prioritize energy efficiency improvement opportunities and set goals for implementation Richard A. Peterson NATC
13
Why Conduct and Energy Audit?
Energy audits provide a decision making tool to help farm operators assess appropriate energy conservation measures Energy audits provide a clear picture of a farm’s energy use and the pattern of usage by day and by season Audits are sometimes required as part of energy related grant applications, such as the USDA REAP grant program. Richard A. Peterson NATC
14
Thinking About a Renewable Energy System?
An energy audit will provide valuable information about energy use patterns on your farm. This information is very important as you assess the economics of a renewable energy system. Richard A. Peterson NATC
15
What are Energy Utilization Indices?
Energy Utilization Indices (EUIs) refer to the amount of energy used to accomplish a certain activity or process. EUIs for farms are stated in various ways: kWh/unit of production (cwt of milk, bu. of grain) kWh/animal unit (cow, feeder pig, 100 chickens) Richard A. Peterson NATC
16
What Are Energy Conservation Measures?
Energy Conservation Measures refer to equipment or operational measures that will increase efficiency and save energy Richard A. Peterson NATC
17
The Value of Knowing EUIs
Determining farm EUIs provides benchmarking data related to similar farms in the same region Having valid EUI data helps farm operators prioritize energy efficiency upgrades Richard A. Peterson NATC
18
How Dairy Farms Use Energy
Information Gathered in an Energy Audit Northeast Agriculture Technology Corp. Ithaca, NY Richard A. Peterson NATC
19
Major Energy use Functions on a Dairy Farm
Milk Harvest* Milk Cooling* Lighting* Air Circulation* and Ventilation Washing and Water Heating* Manure Handling Water Pumping Feed Handling Compressed Air *Indicates uses where significant energy savings is possible Richard A. Peterson NATC
20
WHERE IS ELECTRICITY USED ON DAIRY FARMS?
Summary of electric energy use on a typical dairy farm Source: NATC, Ithaca, NY Richard A. Peterson NATC
21
Freestall vs. Tie Stall Operations
Freestall operations Tie stall operations Richard A. Peterson NATC
22
Renewable Energy Systems
Farms make a good fit Richard A. Peterson NATC
23
Key Issues of On-Farm Biogas Generation
Richard A. Peterson NATC
24
Anaerobic Digesters are common worldwide
There are 6 to 8 million low technology farm-based digesters used to provide biogas for cooking and lighting The worldwide trend is toward larger, more sophisticated systems with advanced process control. The European Union countries are most advanced in anaerobic digester applications Richard A. Peterson NATC
25
Farm Biogas Plants In The European Union
Source: AD NETT, European Anaerobic Digester Network Richard A. Peterson NATC
26
Large Scale Agricultural AD in Germany
Richard A. Peterson NATC
27
Anaerobic Digesters in the US
The first farm based digester was built at McCabe Farms in 1972 McCabe farms is a hog farm bordering the Town of Mt Pleasant, IA Odor control was the driving reason for building the digester Vertical plug flow/natural gas used to heat Still operational – all biogas is flared Richard A. Peterson NATC
28
Dairy Anaerobic Digesters Elsewhere in the US
Anaerobic digester interest among US dairymen grew during the energy crisis of the 1970s. Numerous digesters were built , but most failed because of high operating costs, and inadequate technology. There is a great resurgence of interest and activity in many dairy states Richard A. Peterson NATC
29
Why Greater Interest in Manure Digesters?
1. Need for controlling odor & managing waste (larger farms) 2. Higher prices for energy 3. Government (USDA) grants & loans 4. Media articles on farms producing green power 5. Increased cost for fertilizer (manure used as a substitute) 6. Firms looking to invest in biogas facilities & sell power 7. Carbon/renewable energy credits Richard A. Peterson NATC
30
Dealing With Volumes of Waste
1,200 lb. cow produces her own weight in manure every 25 days* 150 lb. finishing pig produces its own weight in manure every 15 days* * 98 lbs of manure produced per day * 9.8 lbs of manure produced per day. A herd of 500 cows produces 49,000 lbs. of manure per day A herd of 500 finishing pigs produces 4,900 lbs. of manure per day Richard A. Peterson NATC
31
Components of a Biogas System
Digester: Consists of a closed chamber or lagoon Anaerobic microbes (absence of oxygen) To work correctly, it must be managed. Consistent input, keep within acid/base tolerances, etc. Richard A. Peterson NATC
32
Components of a Biogas System
Solids Separator: Squeezes out liquid to create a dry bedding for cows. Richard A. Peterson NATC
33
Components of a Biogas System
Richard A. Peterson NATC
34
Biogas Production System
Consider the additional expense, number of moving parts, maintenance and management needed to turn gas into electricity. Richard A. Peterson NATC
35
Economics – Two New York Dairies
Sunny Knoll Dairy in New York (1,400 cows) Digester: Site Work Engineering Design Concrete Digester Miscellaneous $40,000 105,000 350,000 27,000 Energy Conversion: Engine-Generator Elec., Controls, Plumb. Biomass Use Bldg. $350,000 145,000 30,000 Family Labor $7,500 2005 Constr. Cost $1,084,500 Patterson Dairy in New York (1,000 cows) Digester: Site Work Engineering Design Concrete Digester Miscellaneous $62,723 99,532 495,930 31,893 Energy Conversion: Engine-Generator Elec., Controls, Plumb. Biomass Use Bldg. $200,000 317,476 51,601 Family Labor $68,553 Solid-liquid separation Building Separator 127,775 53,147 2004 & 05 Constr. Cost $1,508,630 Richard A. Peterson NATC
36
More Farm Renewable Energy Opportunities
Solar and Wind Biomass Production Biofuels Richard A. Peterson NATC
37
Gary Menard Dairy Farm Mooers, NY
A 12.6 kW Solar Photovoltaic System With Zomeworks® Trackers Richard A. Peterson NATC
38
Cost Details Menard Solar System
Total Cost (with tracker) $124,647 NYSERDA Incentive $ 50,400 USDA Grant $ 31,161 Menard Cost $ 43,086 Cost/kWh (34 months) $ 0.41/kWh Note: Solar tracking system can increase annual output by up to 40%. Richard A. Peterson NATC
39
Richard A. Peterson NATC
A 5.5 kW solar system with NOVAR® Tracker Currently producing 50% more than a similar system with a fixed array. Richard A. Peterson NATC
40
Lifetime Output and Economics
Shows lifetime output since May 2009 2006 2007 2008 10 kW Consistently generates approx. 7,000 kWh per year Value: 7,000 kWh x $.09/kWh = $630 per year Simple payback: Installed cost = $50,000 With 30% tax credit, drops to $35,000 Yearly output = $630 worth of energy Takes 55.5 years to pay off Lessons Learned: Inverter destroyed by lightning Output slightly less than ratings Cost of elec. generated = 74 cents/kWh Richard A. Peterson NATC
41
Richard A. Peterson NATC
Summary Farms are energy intensive Energy Conservation and Efficiency Improvements are a logical first step in a long range energy management plan Renewable energy systems are compatible with farm operations Few renewable energy systems are economically feasible without incentives Richard A. Peterson NATC
42
Richard A. Peterson NATC
Summary Renewable energy systems on farms should be considered only after all practical energy efficiency upgrades and energy conservation measures have been adopted Reducing farm load on rural electric distribution systems is beneficial to utilities and customers alike Renewable energy systems producing electricity on farms can reduce stress on rural distribution lines The economics of renewable energy systems will improve over time. Richard A. Peterson NATC
43
Richard A. Peterson NATC
Thank you for your time. Richard A. Peterson NATC
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.