Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Surgery

Name: Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Surgery
Uploaded: 2017-07-12T18:25:11+00:00
Duration: PTM20S20
Channel: Karl Stevers
Description: Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Surgery

Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Surgery
Garrett Peterson DNP, RN, CRNA Association of Veterans Affairs Nurse Anesthetists Annual Education Meeting May 2012

Objectives Discuss the technique used to create a pneumoperitoneum
Describe the complications of laparoscopic surgery Recognize the physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum Select the appropriate anesthetic management techniques used for laparoscopic surgery Identify the postoperative considerations for laparoscopic surgery

Introduction Laparoscopy Greek words
Laparo- meaning flank Skopein – meaning to examine Definition: process of examining the contents of the abdominal cavity using a specially designed endoscope Use of laparoscopy has been expanded by different surgical specialities over the decades

Common surgical applications of laparoscopy
General Surgery Diagnosis Evaluation of abdominal trauma Lysis of adhesions Cholecystectomy Appendectomy Inguinal hernia repair Bowel resection Esophageal reflux surgery Splenectomy Adrenalectomy Gynecologic Surgery Diagnosis Lysis of adhesions Fallopian-tube surgery Fulgration of endometrrosis Ovarian cyst surgery Laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy Urologic Surgery Nephrectomy

Advantages of laparoscopic surgery
Incisions are small Earlier postoperative mobility Shorter hospital stays

Creation of a Pneumoperitoneum
Air within the peritoneal cavity Essential to perform the surgery Clears the view of the operative site allowing room to move instruments Causes physical stress to the body and has residual effects that can increase morbidity Highest risk to patient is during creation of the pneumoperitoneum

Creation of pneumoperitoneum Two techniques “open or closed” Closed technique (older of the two) Spring loaded needle (Veress needle) used to pierce the abdominal wall at the thinnest point the infraumbilical region Position confirmed by injection of 10 ml of saline If unable to aspirate saline, placement is correct Carbon dioxide (CO2) is placed through the needle to create a space between abdominal wall and organs

The “open” or Hasson technique Small incision (1.5-3 cm) inferior to the umbilicus Peritoneum is directly incised Trocar (Hasson cannula) is placed Abdomen is insufflated and the catheter is sutured in place

Research Visceral injuries less frequent with open technique (not statistically significant) Major vascular injuries were less when Hasson technique was used compared to the Veress needle

Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery
Potential for injury Structures close to puncture site IVC, aorta, iliac arteries and veins, bladder, bowel, and uterus Obesity, thin habitus, adhesions, masses (tumors) Additional injuries Trauma to major vascular structures % of cases Gas embolism Injury to abdominal or pelvic organs Migration of gas to extraperitoneal spaces

Gas embolism Rare risk of cardiac arrest Reported incidence 1 in 77,604 cases Likely to occur during insufflation Wrong placement of needle into vessel or organ Gas bubbles enter circulation Pulmonary hypertension Right ventricular failure Pulmonary edema Large bubble can cause a “gas lock” phenomenon which can obstruct right ventricular outflow

Gas embolism Signs/symptoms Hypotension Dysrhythmia “mill wheel” murmur (churning sound) Cyanosis Pulmonary edema

Gas embolism Management Stop gas insufflation Shut off nitrous if being used 100% O2 administration Release pneumoperitoneum Place patient in left lateral decubitus position Aspirate gas through a central venous catheter

Visceral Injuries Occurring when closed technique is used 0.1 – 0.4% Trocar insertion Gastrointestinal tract perforation Hepatic and spleen tears Reduction of risk of trauma Decompression with NG for stomach Emptying of bladder with foley catheter

Visceral lesions Not recognized right away Most in postoperative period when symptoms arise Sepsis Fistulas Peritonitis Abscesses

Pneumothorax (serious but rare) A review of 968 cases revealed the incidence of pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum in 1.9% of patients Higher risk for those undergoing surgery for esophageal reflux disease Occurs by two mechanisms Gas entering weak points in esophagus or aorta Barotrauma secondary to increased airway pressures and decreased pulmonary compliance Ruptured bleb

Subcutaneous emphysema (minor complication) Trocar or Veress needle misplacement in subcutaneous tissue Manifested by crepitus

Gas used Most common is CO2 Readily available and inexpensive Does not support combustion Rapidly absorbed from the vascular space Easily excreted Can cause hypercarbia Peritoneal and diaphragmatic irritation Leading to shoulder pain

Physiologic Effects of Pneumoperitoneum
Degree of intraabdominal pressure (impede diaphragmatic expansion) Presence of preexisting cardiac disease (increased catecholamine release) Intravascular volume depletion (decrease cardiac output) Duration of the surgery (hypercarbia)

Three mechanisms of how pneumoperitoneum affects the body Direct mechanical effect Presence of neurohumoral responses Effects of absorbed CO2 Pneumoperitoneum-induced physiological changes Ventilatory techniques Intraoperative positioning Surgical conditions (presence of retractors and packing in) Neurohumoral Release of epinephrine norepinephrine histamine acetylcholine Absorbed CO2 – respiratory depressant Obtundation Increased ICP Metabolic alkalosis hyperkalemia

Hemodynamic Changes Associated with Pneumoperitoneum Hemodynamic Parameter Result CVP Increased or decreased Mean Arterial Pressure Increased Stroke Volume Decreased Cardiac output Increased/decreased or same Systemic Vascular Resistance Heart rate

SVR increased Documented in laparoscopy patients At intraabdominal pressures of 14 mmHg Increases in SVR as high as 65% Mechanism Increased compression of abdominal arteries and humoral factor release (vasopressin, renin) have caused increased afterload

CVP filling pressures Mixed opinions Patients with increased intrabdominal pressures in range of 14 to 20 mmHg had increased CVP Patients with increased intraabdominal pressures > 20 mmHg had a decrease in CVP Mechanisms Vasodilation actions of anesthetics Intraoperative positioning

Stroke Volume Reduction Decreases seen when intraabdominal pressure was in range of 14 to 15 mmHg Interventions to attenuate the decrease in SV Trendelenburg position Adequate hydration Compression of the lower extremities

Cardiac Output/Cardiac Index Typically decreased Up to 50% reduction in CO has been seen Noticed with intraabdominal pressures of 8 to 12 mmHg, with significant reduction at 16 mmHg 5 to 10 minutes after initial decrease, it will partially reverse and increase back to baseline Increase in heart rate occurs in laparoscopy patients Interventions Wrapping of legs Optimize intravascular volume

Arterial Blood Pressure Increased At intraabdominal pressures as low as 14 mmHg Up to 35% increase in MAP Mechanism Increased afterload caused from pneumoperitoneum

Humoral factors Increased afterload in patients with CO2 pneumoperitoneum Increased dopamine, vasopressin, epinephrine, norepinephrine, renin, and cortisol Vasopressin is the most significant mediator Catecholamine level increase secondary to stress response

Cardiovascular effect of pneumoperitoneum Distention of the vagus nerve during insufflation Bradycardia is sometimes observed Increased intraabdominal pressure can reduce lower extremity blood flow velocity

Patients who are ASA Class III or IV are significantly more prone to the effects of pneumoperitoneum especially if they suffer from altered hemodynamics

CO2 pneumoperitoneum Increases in partial pressure of arterial CO2 (PaCO2) and end-tidal CO2 with or without acidosis Caused by absorption of gas on peritoneal surface No increase in O2 consumption during insufflation Maximum absorption rate of CO2 is noted with intraabdominal pressure of 10 mmHg PaCO2 levels reach a plateau approximately after 40 minutes of induction of the peritoneum

Mild hypercapnia (45 to 50 mmHg) not clinically significant Hypercapnia (50 to 70 mmHg) can cause increased physiologic effects Increased CBF Peripheral vasodilation Pulmonary vasoconstriction Increase risk of cardiac dysrhythmias

Pulmonary Function Changes Associated with Pneumoperitoneum Pulmonary Change Result Positive inspiratory pressure (PIP) Increased Pulmonary compliance Decreased Vital capacity Functional residual capacity Intrathroacic pressure

Controlled ventilation Increase of 20 to 30 % in minute ventilation will help to decrease the hypercapnia that occurs during pneumoperitoneum Careful with respiratory compromised patients May have CO2 retention leading to decreases in arterial pH With very high ETCO2, a direct measurement of PaCO2 may be warranted because ETCO2 may underestimate PaCO2

Endobronchial intubation Cephalad displacement of the diaphragm from the increased intraabdominal pressure One study 50 patients with IAP 15 mmHg Patients in reverse Trendelenburg position 6% had right mainstem intubation

Kidneys Oliguria Compression of kidneys Compression of inferior vena cava Increase in levels of antidiuretic hormone Significant reduction in renal blood flow Intraabdominal pressure around 24 mmHg Humoral factors Vasopressin, renin, aldosterone

Hepatic/Spleen One study, Intraabdominal pressure around 16 mmHg and elevated head of bed caused a 68% decrease in hepatic blood flow Another study, IAP of 12 mmHg increased hepatic perfusion Splanchnic blood flow not disrupted with IAP of 11 to 13 mmHg

Anesthetic Management
General, regional and local have been used Local Minor GYN procedures Diagnostic laparoscopy or sterilization Only one hole is created and scope is very small Shorter hospital stay and reduction in anesthetic costs 5.5% converted to general Surgical exposure was limited

General, regional and local have been used Regional Limited to minor GYN surgical procedures Shoulder and chest discomfort result from pneumoperitoneum is not well managed with the regional technique

General, regional and local have been used General Most practical Manages patient discomfort Controlled ventilation Use of muscle relaxation

Use of LMA Controversial Increased intraabdominal and intrathoracic pressures Increase risk of gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary aspiration Study with 1469 GYN laps concluded that use of an LMA “appears safe” Study using fiberoptic examination of the laryngopharynx of 91 pts with an LMA failed to show any regurgitation

Guidelines for Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway During Laparoscopy Ensure clinician is an experienced LMA user Select patients carefully (e.g., fasted, not obese) Use correct size of LMA Make surgeon aware of the use of the LMA Use total IV anesthetic technique or volatile agent Adhere to “15” rule: <15 degrees tilt; < 15 cm H2O intraabdominal pressure; <15 min duration Avoid inadequate anesthesia during surgery Avoid disturbance of the patient during emergence Maltby JR et al. LMA-Classic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecological laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth. 2003; 50:71-77.

Postoperative Considerations
N&V Common after laparoscopy surgery Some research shows 50-62% incidence Pain Usually visceral quality on day of surgery Abdominal distension Traction on the nerves and trauma to blood vessels Shoulder pain on first day post-op CO2 induced intraperitoneal acidosis irritates the phrenic nerve, leading to the shoulder pain

Postoperative Considerations
Post-op pain Managed with multimodal approach NSAIDS, local anesthetics, and opioids Research shows the use of NSAIDS in combination with opioids result in a synergism leading to decreased opioid consumption Research on port-site infiltration showed value but short lived

Future of Laparoscopic Surgery
Overcomes some of the limitations imposed by standard laparoscope technology Robotic surgery Robotic-assisted surgery daVinci surgical system Surgeon can be 100’s of miles away 3-d imaging Robot assisted radical prostatectomy requires steep Trendelenburg tile (30 to 45 degrees) which increases laryngeal edema and brachial plexus injury

References Nagelhout, John J. & Plaus, Karen L. Nurse Anesthesia, W.B. Saunders Company, 4th ed., 2010;32: Sandhu, T., Yamada, S, et al. (2008). Surgical Endoscopy

Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Surgery

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Surgery"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Surgery

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Surgery"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback