Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMckenna Bunney Modified over 10 years ago
1
Long-Term Soil P and K Trends in Relation to Nutrient Removal in Corn-Soybean Rotations Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University Joint Meeting NEC-17, NCERA-13, SERA-6 June 22-25 2008
2
Basis of Soil P and K Testing Use Soil test correlation and calibration Interpretation: interpretation categories Fertilizer recommendations Response-based and often some buildup for the low-testing categories, those with high probability of response. Maintenance of desirable soil-test levels, those with low probability of response. Based on nutrient removal and/or empirical data.
3
Removal-Based P and K Maintenance CropUnit of Yield P 2 O 5 K 2 O Cornbu0.3750.30 Corn silagebu grain equiv.0.551.25 Corn silage ton, 65% H 2 O 3.508.0 Soybeanbu0.801.5 Oat and strawbu0.401.0 Oat strawton5.033.0 Wheatbu0.600.30 Alfalfaton12.540.0 Red cloverton12.035.0 Pounds per unit of yield Pm-1688 pub, ISU Example from Iowa
4
Some Relevant Questions Are assumed buildup and maintenance rate appropriate? Does maintenance make sense? What level should be maintained? Does removal-based fertilization really maintain STP and STK levels? How do yield, removal, and soil-test values in the short term and long term? What are the impacts of wrong yield and nutrient concentration estimates?
5
Long Term Studies in Iowa 5 trials for P, 12 years each, no-till 5 trials for K, 10 years each, no-till Corn/Soybean rotations, both crops each year on adjacent identical trials 3 P rates: 0, 14, and 28 kg P/ha 3 K rates: 0, 33, and 66 kg P/ha Broadcast and band placement methods Measured yield from all plots and soil tests for the control and the high rate
6
Soils and Properties
7
POTASSIUM
8
Soybean Long-Term Trends
9
Corn Long-Term Trends
10
Average Relative Responses
11
Soil-Test K Long-Term Trends
12
K Removal & Post-Harvest STK
13
Grain K Concentration and Yield Avg = 1.2 lb K 2 O/bu Current (dry basis) = 1.7 lb K 2 O/bu
14
Grain K Concentration and Yield Avg = 0.22 lb K 2 O/bu Current (dry basis) = 0.35 lb K 2 O/bu
15
K Removal and Yield
17
PHOSPHORUS
18
P Soybean: Yield Trends
19
P Corn: Yield Trends
20
P Average Relative Responses
21
Grain P Concentration & Yield Avg = 0.78 lb P 2 O 5 /bu Current (dry basis) = 0.92 lb P 2 O 5 /bu Mean = 0.57%
22
Grain P Concentration & Yield Avg = 0.31 lb P 2 O 5 /bu Current (dry basis) = 0.44 lb P 2 O 5 /bu Mean = 0.24%
23
Grain P Removal and Yield
25
Soil-Test P Trends Over Time
26
P Removal & Post-Harvest STP
27
Cumulative P Removal & Soil P 47 lb P 2 O 5 /acre/year for 1 ppm/year decrease Averages of Non-Fertilized Plots Across Locations
28
P Removal & Soil P Increase Averages of Fertilized Plots Across Locations
29
Grain Yield and Concentrations Crop yields vary greatly across field and years. We overestimated yield, as most farmers do with yield goals. Grain P and K concentration also vary across field and years Estimates of P and K concentration in grain were much higher than observed averages. Increased up to a certain plateau with the fertilizer rate and soil-test values Grain P and K concentrations were not correlated with yield level across sites.
30
Removal and Soil Test Values Our overestimation of yield levels and nutrient concentrations resulted in a significant overestimation of removal. Removal was well reflected on soil-test values in the long term, but very poorly or not at all in the short term slow P recycling of residue P and K? slow equilibria between soil P and K pools?
31
Implications for Management Major errors at estimating P and K removal is caused by error in grain yield estimates. Removal-based P and K maintenance based on good yield and concentration estimates maintain or only slightly increase soil-test P and K it over time. Removal-based maintenance rates must be based on yield averages over time, not from year to year changes.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.