Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHector Whittingham Modified over 9 years ago
1
Nutrient Loading in the Klamath Basin K.A. Rykbost B.A. Charlton Oregon State University Klamath Experiment Station
2
Source: USGS --- Snyder & Morace
4
U.S. Department of Interior --- Bureau of Reclamation
5
Environmental Issues are Driven by Political/Regulatory Forces Federal Clean Water Act °303D Lists of Water Quality Impairments °TMDL Process --- Oregon DEQ Oregon Senate Bill 1010 °Private Property Agriculture Management Plans °Local Advisory Committees --- Oregon D.A. Endangered Species Act °Listed Species --- Suckers and Salmon
6
Water Quality Concerns in Upper Klamath Lake Phosphorous Enrichment supporting Blue-Green Algae (Aphanizomenon flos-aqaue) pH > 9.0 (following algae bloom crashes) Dissolved Oxygen below 4.0 mg/l High Ammonia concentration (up to 0.9 ppm) High chlorophyll – a High temperature (up to 23C)
7
Sucker Springs, Upper Klamath Lake --- USGS BRD Klamath
9
Source: USGS --- Snyder & Morace
10
Lake-Wide Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Upper Klamath Lake 1991-1998 Source: Klamath Tribes --- Kann & Walker
11
Major Studies of Nutrient Loading of Klamath/Agency Lakes Miller & Tash: USGS 1965-66 °Ag. Drainage contributes 26% of TP Inflow °Top 1” of sediment = 60 years of Inflow P °Springs in lake contribute 25% of TP Inflow °Canals contribute 5% of TP Inflow °Major rivers contribute 43% of TP Inflow
12
Major Studies of Nutrient Loading of Klamath/Agency Lakes Snyder & Morace: USGS 1993-95 °Estimated 80 tons N/year, 15 tons P/year °Monitored drainage from Ag. Lands °Noted potential for natural sources °Reported high P in artesian wells °Suggested conversions to wetlands based on loading data
13
Major Studies of Nutrient Loading of Klamath/Agency Lakes Kann & Walker: Klamath Tribes 1991-98 °Modeled Loading Data from: °Miller and Tash; Snyder and Morace °Monitored Lake-wide Nutrient Concentrations °Reported Sediment P = 61% of Load °Suggested data used as basis for retiring Ag. Land to Wetlands
14
Source: Klamath Tribes --- Kann & Walker
16
Objectives of Klamath Experiment Station Studies Determine nutrient content in background sources °Major Springs and Artesian Wells Determine nutrient content in water flooded onto and drained from Ag. Lands Determine nutrient loading to Klamath Irrigation Project from Klamath Lake and Klamath River
17
KES Water Quality Analysis Methods All samples were grab samples -- duplicate Samples frozen & stored for batch delivery Kjeldahl digestion -- analyzed for: °Total P and Total Kjeldahl N OSU Dept. of Crop and Soil Science °Central Analytical Laboratory
18
Phosphorus Concentration in Major Springs Wood River Source [P] = 0.06 and 0.07 ppm Spring Creek Source [P] = 0.08, 0.09, and 0.09 ppm Fort Creek Source [P] = 0.06 and 0.09 ppm Crystal Creek Source [P] = 0.07 and 0.11 ppm Barkley Spring [P] = 0.08 ppm Malone Spring [P] = 0.06 ppm
19
P and N Concentration Artesian Wells Wood River Ranch Well #1 Snyder & Morace 3 samples 1993-95 °Total P = 6.7 ppm °Total N = 6.2 ppm Klamath Experiment Station 4 samples 1998-2000 °Total P = 5.3 ppm °Total N = 6.2 ppm Well #2 Snyder & Morace 1 sample 1995 °Total P = 2.0 ppm °Total N = 8.7 ppm Klamath Experiment Station 4 samples 1998-2000 °Total P = 2.4 ppm °Total N = 8.1 ppm
20
P and N Concentration Artesian Wells Fort Klamath Area -- 230 foot aquifer °#1 (2 samples) [P] = 0.31 ppm, [TKN] = 0.25 ppm °#2 (2 samples) [P] = 0.70 ppm, [TKN] = 0.50 ppm °#3 (2 samples) [P] = 0.74 ppm, [TKN] = 0.55 ppm °#4 (3 samples) [P] = 0.75 ppm, [TKN] = 0.50 ppm °#5 (2 samples) [P] = 1.17 ppm, [TKN] = 1.13 ppm °#6 (1 samples) [P] = 1.56 ppm, [TKN] = 1.90 ppm
21
Source: USGS --- Snyder & Morace
22
Nutrient Content of Inflow and Drainage from Agricultural Lands Wocus Snyder & Morace - 1993-95 (9 samples) °Drainage: TP = 0.21 ppm and TN = 4.2 ppm KES - 1998-2000 (19 inflow, 24 drainage) °Drainage: TP = 0.18 ppm and TKN = 3.8 ppm °Inflow: TP = 0.13 ppm and TKN = 2.8 ppm
23
Nutrient Content of Inflow and Drainage from Agricultural Lands Caledonia Snyder & Morace - 1993-95 (3 samples) °Drainage: TP = 0.24 ppm and TN = 4.2 ppm KES - 1998-2000 (10 inflow, 16 drainage) °Drainage: TP = 0.24 ppm and TKN = 3.7 ppm °Inflow: TP = 0.06 ppm and TKN = 1.1 ppm
24
Nutrient Content of Inflow and Drainage from Agricultural/Wetlands Wood River Ranch Snyder & Morace - 1993-95 (12 samples) °Drainage: TP = 0.96 ppm and TN = 3.0 ppm KES - 1999-2000 (52 inflow and 32 drainage) °Drainage: TP = 0.78 ppm and TKN = 3.25 ppm °Inflow: TP = 0.17 ppm and TKN = 1.25 ppm * Note: Cattle removed in 1995
25
U.S. Department of Interior --- Bureau of Reclamation
26
Klamath Project Plumbing Diversions into the Klamath Project °A Canal – Out of Klamath Lake °North and ADY Canal – Out of Klamath River °Lost River from Gerber and Clear Lake Reservoirs Klamath Irrigation Project Drain °Straits Drain from Lower Klamath Wildlife Refuge
27
Methods for Estimating Nutrient Loading to Klamath Irrigation Project Sample at diversions - 2 week intervals °grab samples - usually duplicate BOR flows for midway between samples Load = volume x concentration
28
Nutrient Concentrations at A Canal Diversion - 1999
29
Nutrient Concentrations at A Canal Diversion - 2000
30
Total Phosphorus Loading at A, North, and ADY Canals - 1999
31
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Loading at A, North, and ADY Canals - 1999
32
Total Phosphorus Loading at A, North, and ADY Canals - 2000
33
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Loading at A, North, and ADY Canals - 2000
34
Seasonal Mean Nutrient Concentrations at A, North, and ADY Diversions A Canal °1999TP = 0.166 ppmTKN = 2.11 ppm °2000TP = 0.184 ppmTKN = 2.23 ppm North Canal °1999TP = 0.175 ppmTKN = 1.72 ppm °2000TP = 0.222 ppmTKN = 1.82 ppm ADY Canal °1999TP = 0.195 ppmTKN = 1.95 ppm °2000TP = 0.220 ppmTKN = 1.93 ppm
35
Nutrient Loading Summary KES data were well within range of observations from previous studies Natural background sources are not limiting in Phosphorus for blue-green algae Loading from Ag. Drainage must consider nutrients in floodwater
36
Nutrient Loading Summary Nutrient concentration in Wood River Ranch drainage 80% of 1993-95 value, 5 years after cattle removed Total nutrient loading in Irrigation Project from Klamath Lake and Klamath River °Approximately 180,000 Total P and 2,000,000 Total N P increases from Klamath Lake to ADY Canal
37
Nutrient Loading Summary Monitoring Nutrient Loading at Straits Drain °UC Davis Study °Preliminary Analysis shows P discharge = 100,000 lb Klamath Irrigation Project °Net sink for Phosphorus including affects of municipalities and wildlife refuges
38
Wetland/Storage Restoration Projects Wood River Ranch – 3,000 Ac - Wetlands Goose Bay Farms – 2,187 Ac - Wetlands Agency Lake Ranch – 7,123 Ac – Storage, Wetland Tulana Farms – 4,600 acres Wetlands Caledonia Marsh – 550 acres - Wetlands Barnes Ranch – 2,700 Ac – Storage – Refuge?
39
Nutrient Loading in The Klamath Basin: Agricultural and Natural Sources Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Special Report 1023 K.A. Rykbost and B.A. Charlton Available at: www.orst.edu/dept/kes
40
Questions?? Oregon State University Klamath Experiment Station
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.