Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

May 2013. 2 Oklahoma = 8.0 Map credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "May 2013. 2 Oklahoma = 8.0 Map credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis."— Presentation transcript:

1 May 2013

2 2

3 Oklahoma = 8.0 Map credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 3

4 16. Oklahoma Chart credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 Chart credit: Economic Policy Institute, “Charting the State of the U.S. Economy: EPI’s Top Charts of 2012.” 9

10 10

11 16. Oklahoma13. Oklahoma Chart credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 11

12 Chart credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 12

13 Chart credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 13

14 18. Oklahoma Chart credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 14

15 Chart credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 15

16 Chart credit : Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 16

17 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 17

18 Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “Charting the State of the U.S. Economy: EPI’s Top Charts of 2012.” 18

19 Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “Charting the State of the U.S. Economy: EPI’s Top Charts of 2012.” 19

20 Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “Charting the State of the U.S. Economy: EPI’s Top Charts of 2012.” 20

21 United States and Oklahoma 21

22 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 22

23 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. +.1% -1.6% -1.9% -1.6% +1.6% +5.3% (Percent change shown above bars) 23

24 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. OklahomaUnited States 24

25 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. OklahomaUnited States 25

26 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 26

27 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 27

28 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 28

29 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 29

30 All White Black Asian & PI Hispanic Source: US Census Bureau, “Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012.” 30

31 Source: US Census Bureau, “Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012.” 31

32 Source: Economic Policy Institute, “The State of Working America, 12 th edition.” 32

33 Source: Community Service Council, “Roots of the Human Investment Challenge,” February 27, 2003. 27% decline between 1973 and 1993 33

34 Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “The State of Working America, 12 th edition.” 34

35 Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “The State of Working America, 12 th edition.” 35

36 Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “The State of Working America, 12 th edition.” 36

37 Source: Economic Policy Institute, “The State of Working America, 12 th edition.” 37

38 Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “The State of Working America, 12 th edition.” 38

39 39

40 Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “Charting the State of the U.S. Economy: EPI’s Top Charts of 2012.” 40

41 Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “Charting the State of the U.S. Economy: EPI’s Top Charts of 2012.” 41


Download ppt "May 2013. 2 Oklahoma = 8.0 Map credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google