Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMilo Wellborn Modified over 9 years ago
1
Public Hearings November 19, 2013
2
Case: PSP-13-06-139 Project: Moss Park PD / Parcel E Phase 3 PSP Applicant: Lance Bennett, Poulos & Bennett District: 4 Acreage:~17.3 acres Proposed:Construction of 45 single-family dwelling units Moss Park PD / Parcel E Phase 3 PSP
6
Action Requested Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Moss Park PD / Parcel E Phase 3 PSP subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Moss Park PD / Parcel E Phase 3 PSP
7
Case: PSP-13-04-103 Project: Ashlin Park PD / Ashlin Park PSP Applicant: Jamie T. Poulos, Poulos & Bennett District: 1 Acreage:~65.8 acres Proposed Use:Construction of 259 dwelling units (149 Village Homes and 110 Townhomes) Ashlin Park PD / Ashlin Park PSP
11
Modified Condition # 8 8. 8.The project contains 264 unvested units that are subject to the County's school capacity policy (a/k/a the Martinez Doctrine.) The developer has purchased 178 Owner's Units established under the Capacity Enhancement Agreement by and between KB Home Orlando, LLC and the School Board dated 8/29/2005 (CEA # 05-019), and amended on 11/30/2010 and on 3/12/2013, and the developer has purchased 86 Owner's Units established under the Capacity Enhancement Agreement by and between KB Home Orlando, LLC and the School Board dated 8/29/2005 (CEA #05-021), and amended on 11/30/2010 and on 3/12/2013. The Developer shall comply with all provisions of the Capacity Enhancement Agreements. Ashlin Park PD / Ashlin Park PSP
12
Modified Condition # 8 (Continued) Upon the County's receipt of written notice from OCPS that the developer is in default or breach of the Capacity Enhancement Agreement, the County shall immediately cease issuing building permits for any unvested units. The County shall again begin issuing building permits upon Orange County Public Schools' written notice to the County that the developer is no longer in breach or default of the Capacity Enhancement Agreement. The developer and its successor(s) and/or assign(s) under the Capacity Enhancement Agreement shall indemnify and hold the County harmless from any third party claims, suits or actions arising as a result of the cessation of the County's issuance of residential building permits resulting from such notification from OCPS. Ashlin Park PD / Ashlin Park PSP
13
Modified Condition # 8 (Continued) Developer, and its successor(s) and/or assign(s) under the Capacity Enhancement Agreement, agrees that is shall not claim in any future litigation that the County's enforcement of any of these conditions are illegal, improper, unconstitutional, or a violation of Developer's rights. Orange County shall be held harmless by the Developer and its successor(s) and/or assign(s) under the Capacity Enhancement Agreement, in any dispute between the Developer and OCPS over any interpretation or provision of the Capacity Enhancement Agreement. At the time of platting, documentation shall be provided from Orange County Public schools that this project is in compliance with the Capacity Enhancement Agreement. Ashlin Park PD / Ashlin Park PSP
14
Action Requested Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Ashlin Park PD / Ashlin Park PSP subject to the conditions listed in the staff report (and modified condition #8 as stated). Ashlin Park PD / Ashlin Park PSP
15
Case: RZ-13-09-027 Applicant: Robert Carrigan, Jr. District: 5 Acreage:~0.75 acres Request:C-3 (Wholesale Commercial District) and A-2 (Farmland Rural District) to C-2 (General Commercial District) RZ-13-09-027 (Conventional Rezoning)
16
Zoning Map RZ-13-09-027 (Conventional Rezoning) Zoning Map
17
RZ-13-09-027 (Conventional Rezoning) FLU Map RZ-13-09-027 (Conventional Rezoning) FLU Map
18
RZ-13-09-027 (Conventional Rezoning) Aerial Map RZ-13-09-027 (Conventional Rezoning) Aerial Map
19
Action Requested Make a finding of inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan and deny the requested C-2 (General Commercial District) zoning. RZ-13-09-027 (Conventional Rezoning)
20
Case: LUP-13-03-057 Project: Windermere Landing PD Applicant: Adam Smith, VHB, Inc. District: 1 Acreage:~39.3 acres Proposed Use:100 single-family detached residential dwelling units Windermere Landing PD
21
Zoning Map Windermere Landing PD Zoning Map
22
Windermere Landing PD Lakeside Village SAP Map (FLUM) Windermere Landing PD Lakeside Village SAP Map (FLUM)
23
Windermere Landing PD Aerial Map Windermere Landing PD Aerial Map
24
Windermere Landing PD Land Use Plan Windermere Landing PD Land Use Plan
25
Action Requested Windermere Landing PD Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Windermere Landing PD subject to the conditions listed in the staff report, along with the associated APF Agreement.
26
Public Hearings November 19, 2013
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.