1. Chapter 3: Neural Processing and Perception

2. Lateral Inhibition and Perception Experiments with eye of Limulus –Ommatidia allow recordings from a single receptor. –Light shown into a single receptor leads to rapid firing rate of nerve fiber. –Adding light into neighboring receptors leads to reduced firing rate of initial nerve fiber.

3. Figure 3-2 p54

4. Figure 3-3 p55

5. Lateral Inhibition and Lightness Perception Three lightness perception phenomena explained by lateral inhibition –The Hermann Grid: Seeing spots at an intersection –Mach Bands: Seeing borders more sharply –Simultaneous Contrast: Seeing areas of different brightness due to adjacent areas

6. Hermann Grid People see an illusion of gray images in intersections of white areas. Signals from bipolar cells cause effect –Receptors responding to white corridors send inhibiting signals to receptor at the intersection –The lateral inhibition causes a reduced response which leads to the perception of gray.

7. Figure 3-4 p55

8. Figure 3-5 p55

9. Mach Bands People see an illusion of enhanced lightness and darkness at borders of light and dark areas. –Actual physical intensities indicate that this is not in the stimulus itself. –Receptors responding to low intensity (dark) area have smallest output. –Receptors responding to high intensity (light) area have largest output.

10. Figure 3-9 p57

11. Mach Bands - continued –All receptors are receiving lateral inhibition from neighbors –In low and high intensity areas amount of inhibition is equal for all receptors –Receptors on the border receive differential inhibition

12. Mach Bands - continued –On the low intensity side, there is additional inhibition resulting in an enhanced dark band. –On the high intensity side, there is less inhibition resulting in an enhanced light band. –The resulting perception gives a boost for detecting contours of objects.

13. Lateral Inhibition and Simultaneous Contrast People see an illusion of changed brightness or color due to effect of adjacent area –An area that is of the same physical intensity appears: lighter when surrounded by a dark area. darker when surrounded by a light area.

14. Lateral Inhibition and Simultaneous Contrast - continued –Receptors stimulated by bright surrounding area send a large amount of inhibition to cells in center. –Resulting perception is of a darker area than when this stimulus is viewed alone. –Receptors stimulated by dark surrounding area send a small amount of inhibition to cells in center. –Resulting perception is of a lighter area than when this stimulus viewed alone.

15. Figure 3-14 p58

16. Figure 3-15 p59

17. A Display That Can ’ t Be Explained by Lateral Inhibition White ’ s Illusion –People see light and dark rectangles even though lateral inhibition would result in the opposite effect.

18. Explanation of White ’ s Illusion Belongingness –An area ’ s appearance is affected by where we perceive it belongs. –Effect probably occurs in cortex rather than retina. –Exact physiological mechanism is unknown.

19. Figure 3-16 p59

20. Figure 3-17 p59

21. Processing From Retina to Visual Cortex and Beyond Area of receptors that affects firing rate of a given neuron in the circuit Receptive fields are determined by monitoring single cell responses. Research example for vision –Stimulus is presented to retina and response of cell is measured by an electrode.

22. Figure 3-20 p61

23. Figure 3-21 p61

24. Center-Surround Antagonism Output of center-surround receptive fields changes depending on area stimulated: –Highest response when only the excitatory area is stimulated –Lowest response when only the inhibitory area is stimulated –Intermediate responses when both areas are stimulated

25. Figure 3-22 p62

26. Figure 3-23 p62

27. Receptive Fields of Neurons in the Visual Cortex Neurons that fire to specific features of a stimulus Pathway away from retina shows neurons that fire to more complex stimuli Cells that are feature detectors: –Simple cortical cell –Orientation tuning curve –Complex cortical cell –End-stopped cortical cell

28. Figure 3-27 p65

29. Figure 3-28 p65

30. Figure 3-29 p66

31. Table 3-1 p66

32. Selective Rearing Animals are reared in environments that contain only certain types of stimuli –Neurons that respond to these stimuli will become more predominate due to neural plasticity. –Blakemore and Cooper (1970) showed this by rearing kittens in tubes with either horizontal for vertical lines. –Both behavioral and neural responses showed the development of neurons for the environmental stimuli.

33. Figure 3-34 p69

34. Higher Level Neurons Inferotemporal (IT) cortex Prosopagnosia Fusiform face area

35. Figure 3-35 p69

36. Figure 3-36 p70

37. The Sensory Code Sensory code - representation of perceived objects through neural firing –Specificity coding - specific neurons responding to specific stimuli Leads to the “ grandmother cell ” hypothesis Recent research shows cells in the hippocampus that respond to concepts such as Halle Berry.

38. The Sensory Code continued –Problems with specificity coding: Too many different stimuli to assign specific neurons Most neurons respond to a number of different stimuli. Distributed coding - pattern of firing across many neurons codes specific objects –Large number of stimuli can be coded by a few neurons.

39. Figure 3-37 p70

40. Sensory Code The Sensory Code - continued How many neurons are needed for an object in distributed coding? –Sparse coding - only a relatively small number of neurons are necessary This theory can be viewed as a midpoint between specificity and distributed coding.

41. Figure 3-38 p71

42. Figure 3-39 p71

43. Figure 3-40 p72