Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byStephan Gladman Modified over 9 years ago
1
Tests to Verify Low Strength Concrete ACI Georgia Chapter Virgil D. Skipper Seminar June 2009 Robert Jenkins, P. E.
2
Available Testing Procedures Cores Cores Nondestructive Evaluation Nondestructive Evaluation Load Tests Load Tests
3
Core Strength Tests Core Strength Tests SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ACI 301-05 1.6.5.3.a Where required by the Architect/Engineer, obtain cores in accordance with ASTM C 42/C42 M. 1.6.7.3 Core tests—Strength level of concrete in the area represented by core tests will be considered adequate when the average compressive strength of the cores is equal to at least 85% of fc′, and if no single core is less than 75% of the specified compressive strength fc′.
4
Nondestructive Evaluation Unanticipated testing of hardened concrete Unanticipated testing of hardened concrete Rebound Hammer ASTM C805Rebound Hammer ASTM C805 Penetrating Probe ASTM C803Penetrating Probe ASTM C803 Ultrasonic Wave VelocityUltrasonic Wave Velocity Through transmission testing ASTM C597 Through transmission testing ASTM C597 Impact Echo testing ASTM C1383 Impact Echo testing ASTM C1383 Pullout Test ASTM C900Pullout Test ASTM C900
5
Nondestructive Tests SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ACI 301-05 1.6.6.2 Nondestructive tests—Test results will be evaluated by the Architect/Engineer and will be valid only if tests have been conducted using properly calibrated equipment in accordance with recognized standard procedures and an acceptable correlation between test results and concrete compressive strength has been established and is submitted. * * * 1.6.7.2 Nondestructive tests—Nondestructive tests shall not be used as the sole basis for accepting or rejecting concrete, but may be used, when permitted, to evaluate concrete where standard molded and cured cylinders have yielded results not meeting the criteria in 1.6.7.1.
6
Load Test Evaluation ACI 318-08 20.1.3 — If the effect of the strength deficiency is not well understood or if it is not feasible to establish the required dimensions and material properties by measurement, a load test shall be required if the structure is to remain in service.
7
Available Nondestructive Test Methods Rebound Hammer ASTM C805Rebound Hammer ASTM C805 Penetrating Probe ASTM C803Penetrating Probe ASTM C803 Ultrasonic Wave VelocityUltrasonic Wave Velocity Through transmission testing ASTM C597 Through transmission testing ASTM C597 Impact Echo testing ASTM C1383 Impact Echo testing ASTM C1383 Pullout Test ASTM C900Pullout Test ASTM C900
8
Rebound Hammer ASTM C805
9
Rebound Number Correlations
10
Penetrating Probe ASTM C803
12
Penetrating Probe Correlations
13
Ultrasonic Wave Evaluation
14
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity ASTMC597
15
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Correlation
16
Impact - Echo Testing ASTM C1383 T=C p /2*f C p =T*2*f
17
Pullout Test ASTMC900
18
Pullout Test - CAPO
19
Pullout Test cracking patterns
20
Pullout Test – CAPO correlation
22
In-Place Methods to Estimate Concrete Strength ACI Report 228.1-03 ACI Report 228.1-03 Review of Test MethodsReview of Test Methods Statistical Characteristics of Test ResultsStatistical Characteristics of Test Results Development of Strength RelationshipDevelopment of Strength Relationship Implementation of In-Place TestingImplementation of In-Place Testing Interpretation and Reporting of ResultsInterpretation and Reporting of Results In-Place Tests for Acceptance of ConcreteIn-Place Tests for Acceptance of Concrete
23
Construction Project Scenario High Rise Construction – Office Tower Concrete Placement Columns – 7000 psi @ 28 days 60 yards Floor slab – 3500 psi @ 28 days 240 yards
24
Cylinder Test Reports 7 day strengths Set 1 (slab) - 2880 psi Set 2 (slab) - 2780 psi Set 3 (slab) – 2865 psi Set 4 (column) – 3580 psi
25
Ultrasonic Testing at 12 days age Columns Top11500 fps Middle12000 fps Bottom12500 fps Slabs12000 fps
26
Validity of Ultrasonic Wave Velocity Water content of concrete can have an effect on the wave velocity. At higher strengths the spread of wave velocity verses compressive strength is less. The tests of vertical elements must consider the top to bottom effect. Ultrasonic wave tests are affected by discontinuities in the concrete.
27
Validity of Ultrasonic Wave Velocity Water content of concrete can have an effect on the wave velocity. At higher strengths the spread of wave velocity verses compressive strength is less. The tests of vertical elements must consider the top to bottom effect. Ultrasonic wave tests are affected by discontinuities in the concrete.
28
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity
29
Validity of Ultrasonic Wave Velocity Water content of concrete can have an effect on the wave velocity. At higher strengths the spread of wave velocity verses compressive strength is less. The tests of vertical elements must consider the top to bottom effect. Ultrasonic wave tests are affected by discontinuities in the concrete.
30
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Top to Bottom Effect When concrete is placed in a tall vertical placement such as a column or a wall; there is a difference in the concrete strengths from top to bottom with greater strengths at the bottom of the placement.
31
Validity of Ultrasonic Wave Velocity Water content of concrete can have an effect on the wave velocity. At higher strengths the spread of wave velocity verses compressive strength is less. The tests of vertical elements must consider the top to bottom effect. Ultrasonic wave tests are affected by discontinuities in the concrete.
32
Travel time of wave through concrete
33
Cylinder Test Reports 7 day strengths Set 1 (slab) - 2880 psi Set 2 (slab) - 2780 psi Set 3 (slab) – 2865 psi Set 4 (column) – 3580 psi 28 day strengths Set 1 (slab) – 4120 psi Set 2 (slab) – 4280 psi Set 3 (slab) – 3820 psi Set 4 (column) – 4480 psi
34
Rebound Hammer at 35 days age Columns Average Rn = 29 Range Rn 26 to 35 Slabs Average Rn = 26 Range Rn 20 to 31
35
Validity of Rebound Testing Testing the hardness (stiffness) of the concrete surface and shallow depth into concrete. Affected by: Form material and type and smoothness Aggregates, closeness to surface Reinforcing steel, closeness to surface Moisture content Surface finish Hammer orientation
36
Rebound Number Correlations
37
Variation of Rebound Numbers
38
Cylinder Test Reports 28 day strengths Set 1 (slab) – 4120 psi Set 2 (slab) – 4280 psi Set 3 (slab) – 3820 psi Set 4 (column) – 4480 psi 56 day strengths Set 4 (column) – 4930 psi
39
Coring - PROBLEMS Where to core? Where to core? Columns have No. 8 vertical reinforcing bars at 3 inches on center. Clear distance between bars is 2 inches. Columns have No. 8 vertical reinforcing bars at 3 inches on center. Clear distance between bars is 2 inches. ASTM C42 – cores for load bearing elements minimum 3.70 inch diameter. ASTM C42 – cores for load bearing elements minimum 3.70 inch diameter. Core between bars yields 1.75 inch diameter – less than 2 times nominal maximum aggregate size Core between bars yields 1.75 inch diameter – less than 2 times nominal maximum aggregate size
40
WHAT TO DO???
41
Other Nondestructive Tests Penetration Probe Penetration Probe Interference from rebarInterference from rebar Pullout Test – CAPO Pullout Test – CAPOProblems Number of tests required and correlation to concrete strength. Number of tests required and correlation to concrete strength.
42
Load Tests How do you load test a column? Or 15 columns?
43
Load Tests of Concrete Usual area load of slab Usual area load of slab Pattern loading of slabs and beams Pattern loading of slabs and beams Concentrated loading of beam haunch Concentrated loading of beam haunch Special jacks and tension rods for punching shear around column. Special jacks and tension rods for punching shear around column. Cyclic load testing using closed loop controllers and hydraulic jacks. Cyclic load testing using closed loop controllers and hydraulic jacks.
44
Discussion of load tests Strength Evaluation of Existing Concrete Buildings ACI Report 437R-03
45
Redo ultrasonic tests – concrete has dried sufficiently. Take small diameter cores where lower wave velocities are noted. Engineers determine that 5000 psi is sufficient strength for these columns.
46
Questions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.