Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byShea Alles Modified over 9 years ago
1
Mt. San Antonio College CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY February 2012
2
ABOUT KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC 1984 Full Spectrum HR Cities, Counties, Special Districts, Others Straightforward, Interactive, All-Inclusive70% Class & Comp Studies 95% Public Sector Clients
3
WHY WE ARE HERE Classification and Compensation Study Snapshot in Time Incorporate Organizational Changes Involve Employees
4
CLASSIFICATION STUDY
5
PURPOSE OF A CLASS STUDY Up-to-date & Current Enhance Recruitment Process Objective Appraisals Career Paths Training Opportunities Ensure Legal Compliance Fair Compensation System
6
CLASS STUDY METHODOLOGY Initial Meeting with Project Team Orientation Meetings PDQ Completion & Review Employee & Supervisor Interviews Draft Class Concepts Classification Description Development Employee and Supervisor Review Finalization
7
PROPOSED TIMELINE PDQ Due to Supervisor by March 9, 2012 PDQ Due to Department Head by March 16, 2012 PDQ Due to K&A by March 23, 2012 Employee, Supervisor, and Management Interviews – Week of April 2 OR 9, 2012 Draft Class Descriptions Developed by June 30, 2012
8
POSITION DESCRIPTION QUESTIONNAIRE
9
COMPLETING THE PDQ Not a Performance Evaluation Classifications are General During Work Hours (about 4 hours) No Changes by Supervisor
10
PDQ: SECTION 1.0 PURPOSE Brief Summary 2-3 Sentences Overall Purpose of Position Under general supervision, performs a variety of administrative, secretarial, and office assistance in support of management and departmental staff; provides assistance on a variety of assignments related to administration of budgets, contracts, research projects, and department programs; performs skilled word processing, data entry, and typing; provides information to the public and staff. Example: Administrative Assistant
11
PDQ: SECTION 2 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT 2.1 – Immediate Supervisor Name & Title 2.2 – Staff Name and Title 2.3 – Work Decisions (within stated policies & procedures) 2.4 – Referred Decisions 2.5 – Review of Work (not performance review)
12
PDQ: SECTIONS 3.0, 4.0, & 5.0 3.0 EQUIPMENT Computer Hand Tools Power Tools 4.0 CONTACTS Internal & External Not Supervisor Not Co-workers 5.0 BUDGET Actual Amount Expenditures & Revenues
13
PDQ: SECTION 6.0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK List Duties by Importance Begin with Action Verbs Time Frequency Importance
14
EXAMPLE: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT #TIMEFREQIMPDUTIES 125%SDCProvides administrative support to managers and departmental staff by assisting with duties of a complex nature, including preparing and editing agenda items for Board meetings. 215%SDCOrganizes and carries out administrative assignments; researches, compiles, and organizes information and data from various sources on a variety of specialized topics related to programs in assigned area; checks and tabulates standard mathematical or statistical data. 310%WIAssists or administers assigned department projects and/or programs as assigned by management staff.
15
PDQ: SECTIONS 6.1, 6.2, & 6.3 6.1 – FLSA –Exempt or Non-Exempt 6.2 – Complex or Difficult Duties 6.3 – Changes in Responsibilities
16
PDQ: SECTIONS 7.0, 8.0, & 9.0 7.0 SENSORY DEMANDS 8.0 PHYSICAL DEMANDS 9.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
17
PDQ: SECTION 10 JOB REQUIREMENTS 10.1 – Skills, Knowledge, Education, & Experience –Current description –Specify changes 10.2 –Special Licenses/Certifications
18
SUPERVISOR REVIEW Last Page of PDQ Not a Performance Evaluation No Content Changes Comments Only
19
COMPENSATION STUDY
20
SURVEY ELEMENTS Comparator Agencies Benchmark Classifications
21
DATA COLLECTION Job/Class Descriptions MOU’s Organizational Charts Salary Information Description-to-Description 70% Match Follow-Up ALL ANALYSES COMPLETED IN-HOUSE NO QUESTIONNAIRES
22
TOP MONTHLY SPREADSHEET
23
STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS Median Midpoint Not Skewed Average Arithmetic Mean Percentages Above/Below
24
INTERNAL RELATIONSHIPS Lack of Data Non-Surveyed Classifications Whole-Position Analysis –Same class series –Scope of work –Organizational “worth” –Past internal relationships Implementation & Strategy Development
25
STAKEHOLDER TOUCH POINTS Kick-Off & Orientations Employee/Supervisor Interviews Class Description Review Final Classification Issues Compensation Study Elements Survey Results Final Compensation Structure
26
QuestionsComments THANK YOU! KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5 Emeryville, CA 94608 510/658-KOFF (5633) 510/652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com Human Resources Consulting Since 1984
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.