Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.

Published byLevi Smock Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall."— Presentation transcript:

1 Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall report results of annual assessments to district boards of education within 30 days of receipt of information from the Department of Education.”

2 District Factor Groups The District Factor Group (DFG) is an indicator of the socioeconomic status of citizens in each district and has been useful for the comparative reporting of test results from New Jersey’s statewide testing programs. They range from A (lowest socioeconomic districts) to J (highest socioeconomic districts) and are labeled as follows: A, B, CD, DE, FG, GH, I, J.

3 Ensuring Success for All! Evaluate and share data Formulate school goals Develop and implement an action plan Assess effectiveness of program implementation Reevaluate, refocus, and recharge!

4 District Grade 3 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Education Students versus DFG 2006- 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District – 221.5 DFG – 214.9 State - 209.5 75 59 79 7.7 AP

5 District Grade 3 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District -210.1 DFG -196.1 State -1.3 75 59 79

6 DISTRICT GRADE 3 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES LANGUAGE ARTS - 2013 79

7 NJ ASK 2013 COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 79 Scale Score Mean 217.6 215.7

8 District Grade 3 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Education Students versus DFG 2006-2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 265.7 DFG - 250.1 State - 238.3 62 66 83 66.2 AP

9 District Grade 3 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006-2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 246.6 DFG - 218.1 State - 207.3 62 66 83 29.7AP

10 District Grade 3 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES MATHEMATICS - 2013 83

11 NJ ASK 2013COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS 83 Scale Score Mean 259.0 250.7265.7 256.1246.6 227.5266.3 219.9247.3 228.6

12 District Grade 4 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Students versus DFG 2006-2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 226.8 DFG - 218.1 State - 182.8 75 59 79

13 District Grade 4 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006-2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District -199.0 DFG - 190.4 State - 182.8 75 59 79 1.3AP

14 DISTRICT GRADE 4 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES LANGUAGE ARTS - 2013 79

15 NJ ASK 2013COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 79 Scale Score Mean 218.7 219.0226.8 224.1199.0 195.8210.9 202.0207.5 204

16 District Grade 4 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 258.5 DFG - 246.4 State - 235.7 62 66 83 64 AP

17 District Grade 4 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 230.6 DFG - 216.8 State - 207.1 62 66 83 36.4 AP

18 DISTRICT GRADE 4 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES MATHEMATICS - 2013 83

19 NJ ASK 2013 COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS 83 Scale Score Mean 250.1 247.5258.5 252.6230.6 224.2247.4 220.1230.2 226.9

20 District Grade 4 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 255.5 DFG - 253.7 State - 244.5 63.1 AP

21 District Grade 4 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 235.6 DFG - 231.9 State - 223.8

22 DISTRICT GRADE 4 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES SCIENCE - 2013

23 NJ ASK 2013 COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 4 SCIENCE Scale Score Mean 249.3 254.7255,5 258.7235.6 236.9243.9 235.0235.0 239.4

24 District Grade 5 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 222.2 DFG - 219.1 State - 211.0 75 59 79

25 District Grade 5 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 199.5 DFG - 189.6 State - 182.6 29 59 2.4AP

26 DISTRICT GRADE 5 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES LANGUAGE ARTS - 2013 83

27 NJ ASK 2013COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 5 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 79 Scale Score Mean 216.4 219.4222.2 224.1199.5 196.5209.8 200.5207.1 207.4

28 District Grade 5 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 273.2 DFG - 255.3 State - 243.8 62 66 83 70.3 AP

29 District Grade 5 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 236.4 DFG - 214.1 State - 204.8 62 66 83 22.6 AP

30 DISTRICT GRADE 5 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES MATHEMATICS - 2013 83

31 NJ ASK 2013 COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS 83 Scale Score Mean 263.6 255.3273.2 261.8236.4 223.4249.1 225.9246.6 235.4

32 2011-2013 NJ ASK—District Growth Chart Elementary Grades 3,4, and 5

33 District Grade 6 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 223.9 DFG - 219.7 State - 213.1 66 72 86 12.3AP

34 District Grade 6 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 195.9 DFG - 190.4 State - 185.1 66 72 86 1.5 AP

35 DISTRICT GRADE 6 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES LANGUAGE ARTS - 2013 86

36 NJ ASK 2012 COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 6 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 86 Scale Score Mean 216.7 219.3223.9 223.7195.9 196.3230.5 204.0204.3 207.9

37 District Grade 6 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 254.4 DFG - 243.6 State - 234.6 49 61 80 59.1AP

38 District Grade 6 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 213.1 DFG - 198.4 State - 193.7 49 61 80 11.8 AP

39 DISTRICT GRADE 6 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES MATHEMATICS - 2013 80

40 NJ ASK 2013 COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS 80 Scale Score Mean 243.8 243.6254.4 250.0213.1 208.7237.0 216.5222.3 223.5

41 District Grade 7 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 233.1 DFG - 225.6 State - 217.3 66 72 86 19.8 AP

42 District Grade 7 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 200.3 DFG - 187.4 State - 181.4 66 72 86 1.7AP

43 DISTRICT GRADE 7 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES LANGUAGE ARTS - 2013 86

44 NJASK 2013COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 7 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 86 Scale Score Mean 226.1 227.2233.1 232.8200.3 196.1214.6 207.6219.1 213.0

45 District Grade 7 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 247.1 DFG - 233.2 State - 223.5 49 61 80

46 District Grade 7 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 193.0 DFG - 183.4 State - 178.2 49 61 80 8.3 AP

47 DISTRICT GRADE 7 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES MATHEMATICS - 2013 80

48 NJ ASK 2013 COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 7 MATHEMATICS 80 Scale Score Mean 233.4 235.0247.1 242.3193.0 194.2211.6 204.7220.9 212.7

49 District Grade 8 GEPA/NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 235.4 DFG - 231.2 State - 225.0 66 72 86 22.6 AP

50 District Grade 8 GEPA/NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2005 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 208.6 DFG - 202.9 State - 197.6 66 72 86 6.6AP

51 DISTRICT GRADE 8 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES LANGUAGE ARTS - 2013 86

52 NJ ASK 2013 COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 8 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 86 Scale Score Mean 230.1 231.1235.4 235.2208.6 207.5223.5 216.6220.5 221.1

53 District Grade 8 GEPA/NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 247.1 DFG - 241.3 State - 230.2 49 61 80 48.8 AP

54 District Grade 8 GEPA/NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 194.9 DFG - 186.4 State - 179.3 49 61 80 14.5AP

55 DISTRICT GRADE 8 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES MATHEMATICS - 2013 80

56 NJ ASK 2013 COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS 80 Scale Score Mean 237.0 240.1247.1 247.8194.9 194.8225.6 206.1218.6 216.9

57 District Grade 8 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Students versus DFG 2006 - 2013 2013 Scale Score Mean District - 244.3 DFG - 243.2 State - 234.7 47.3 AP

58 District Grade 8 NJASK Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2013 SCIENCE 11.1 AP Scale Score Mean District - 207.3 DFG - 205.8 State - 199.5

59 DISTRICT GRADE 8 NJ ASK TOTAL STUDENTS NCLB PROFICIENCY SCORES SCIENCE - 2013

60 NJ ASK 2013 COMPARISON DISTRICT & “I” DFG GRADE 8 SCIENCE Scale Score Mean 237.1 245.4244.3 250.7207.3 214.7224.5 222.5226.9 230.0

61 2011-2013 NJ ASK Growth Chart Middle School Grades 6, 7, and 8

62 We Combine DATA PYRAMID OF INTERVENTIONS TO INSURE: Success for Each and Every Student Along with Quality and Continuous Improvement FAIR LAWN HIGH SCHOOL RIGOR AND RELEVANCE + +

63 District Grade 11 HSPA Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Education Students versus DFG 2007 - 2013

64 District Grade 11 HSPA Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2007 - 2013

65 District Grade 11 HSPA Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Hispanic Sub-Group versus DFG and State 2007-2013

66 District Grade 11 HSPA Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Asian Sub-Group versus DFG and State 2007-2013

67 CYCLE II MAY 2013 HSPA Fair Lawn Compared to DFG I State District English Language Arts Scale Score Mean 240.2 245.2 244.6 248.7223.4 225.3 218.1 231.8 235.0 236.5 92

68 District Grade 11 HSPA Total NCLB Proficiency Scores General Education Students versus DFG 2007 - 2013

69 District Grade 11 HSPA Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Special Education Students versus DFG 2007 - 2013

70 District Grade 11 HSPA Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Hispanic Sub-Group versus DFG and State 2007-2013

71 District Grade 11 HSPA Total NCLB Proficiency Scores Asian Sub-Group versus DFG and State 2007-2013

72 Cycle II May 2013 HSPA Fair Lawn Compared to DFG I State District Mathematics Scale Score Mean 239.4 241.6 246.8 247.0212.0 209.1 214.3 218.1 230.8 225.8 86

73 We Combine DATA PYRAMID OF INTERVENTIONS TO INSURE: Success for Each and Every Student Along with Quality and Continuous Improvement FAIR LAWN HIGH SCHOOL RIGOR AND RELEVANCE + +

74

Download ppt "Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall."

Similar presentations

BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.

BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.
Hackettstown Public Schools 2014 October Score Report NJASK End of Course Biology HSPA.

Hackettstown Public Schools 2014 October Score Report NJASK End of Course Biology HSPA.
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2014 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.

Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2014 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
District Testing Report: Analyzing The Data Danielle M. Shanley Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 17, 2011 New Milford School District.

District Testing Report: Analyzing The Data Danielle M. Shanley Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 17, 2011 New Milford School District.
Mark J. Raivetz Superintendent Elizabeth Mennig Supervisor Teaching and Learning 21 October 2010 Assessment in the Haddon Township Public Schools 2010.

Mark J. Raivetz Superintendent Elizabeth Mennig Supervisor Teaching and Learning 21 October 2010 Assessment in the Haddon Township Public Schools 2010.
1 The Ewing Public Schools 2011-12 Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.

1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.

ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2012 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.

Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2012 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.

Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October 2013 1.

Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October
PRESENTED BY THE DEMAREST ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM 2013-2014 Annual State of the Schools Assessment Report.

PRESENTED BY THE DEMAREST ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM Annual State of the Schools Assessment Report.
SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation

SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation
1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard 1 2013 Status: Approaching 331.2 (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets 339.5 (2011) 336.1.

1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard Status: Approaching (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets (2011)
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Madison Public Schools Testing Reports 2010-2011 Results Presenter Lee S Nittel Presenter: Lee S Nittel Director of Curriculum and Instruction.

Madison Public Schools Testing Reports Results Presenter Lee S Nittel Presenter: Lee S Nittel Director of Curriculum and Instruction.
HULL HIGH SCHOOL 10 th Grade MCAS Results and Comparisons Spring of 2008 Testing.

HULL HIGH SCHOOL 10 th Grade MCAS Results and Comparisons Spring of 2008 Testing.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.

Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.

CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google