Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWeston Brimley Modified over 9 years ago
1
Introduction Teacher Education Council tasks 2010-2011 TaskStream as a platform to increase utility, flexibility, and adaptability to concerns with and changes to our E-Portfolio Demonstrate key features of the TaskStream platform
2
Who Needs TaskStream? The following groups of students will be required to purchase a 4 year TaskStream account to submit and manage their portfolios: – Undergraduate students who took EDB 300 in Fall 2012 or later – Graduate early childhood licensure students who took ECE 500 in Fall 2012 or later – Graduate special education licensure students who took ESE 500 in Fall 2012 or later – Students in the MUST or Chinese Licensure programs beginning Summer 2012 or later – Students who transferred to the College of Education and Human Services in Fall 2012 or later. Accounts will be activated via $105 lab fee attached to a course or assessed directly by ESSC. Students self-enroll using a program specific code. Refer to Transition Plan
3
Why is Taskstream Good for Students? User-friendly interface Program-specific requirements clearly identified (easier for transfer students as well) Students can have multiple portfolios Artifact-specific rubrics Personalized employment portfolio Notification email is possible
4
Why is Taskstream good for Faculty? Students can submit to anybody at any time to allow fulfillment of incompletes Utility for SPA reporting Login screen with a link to all un-assessed artifacts Instructors not evaluating artifacts on time or at all – Link portfolio assessment with course grading, making it more likely that instructors will grade artifacts. – Candidates can track the status of submitted artifacts – Evaluation manager can evaluate student work or edit previous evaluations.
5
Taskstream Terminology DRF Template/Program Artifact/Requirement Roles: – author – evaluator – evaluation manager
6
Video Overview Let’s Watch! View video
7
Artifact Status Directors and Evaluation Method Artifact Submission Type(s) Form; Text & Image; Slideshow; Standards; Attachments; Videos; Links DRF Template
8
View ALL Artifacts Waiting to be Assessed
9
Evaluation History View Work Aligned Standards
10
Rubric Assessment
11
Resubmit artifact Provide the student with either a sample artifact; their artifact with changes; or any other document Grade artifact, but do not release it to the student for viewing Grade artifact and submit it to student for viewing
12
Checkpoint Assessment—Candidate Responsibilities 3 Checkpoints – Pre-practicum, pre-student teaching, pre-licensure – TPA Candidates submit new artifacts at each checkpoint: – Choice artifacts (2) with a reflection cover sheet – Summative Checkpoint Self-Analysis – Checkpoint assessments divided evenly among all faculty
13
Checkpoint Assessment—Faculty Responsibilities Checkpoint assessments divided evenly among all faculty Checkpoint assessor reviews: – All graded artifacts in a particular program phase to be sure they “meets requirements” – Choice Artifacts and Reflection Sheet using existing portfolio rubrics – Summative Checkpoint Self-Analysis Assessment determines eligibility to move to the next program phase. Ineligible candidates go to the Remediation Board.
14
Support Education Student Services Center (JH 170A; 216-687-4625) Course Instructor College of Education and Human Services TaskStream web page TaskStream Mentoring Services 800-311-5656 Faculty Advisor Coordinator of Assessment and Accreditation Heather Gallacher 216-687-3743 or h.gallacher@csuohio.edu Center for Educational Technology (JH 118)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.