Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKaleb Howell Modified over 10 years ago
1
Trait Approaches Trait Approaches
2
Studying Personality Traits What is the best way to describe personality? How can we identify which traits are the most important from among the thousands of ways in which individuals differ? How can we formulate a comprehensive taxonomy of traits? How can we measure traits?
3
What are traits? Traits = Broad dispositions to act in specific ways Disposition = tendency (e.g., repressors tend to avoid threatening experiences) Broad = abstraction (not specific instance; adjectives (helpful) rather than verbs (help))
4
What are traits? Traits are: 1. Dimensional (ordering of people) not categorical 2. Hypothetical (not observable) 3. Causal (internal) or Descriptive (summaries)
5
What is a Trait? Internal causal properties Internal: individuals carry their desires, needs, and wants from one situation to the next Causal: desires and needs explain the behavior of the individuals who possess them George is jealous because he is insecure
6
What is a Trait? Purely Descriptive Summaries Make no assumptions about internality, nor is causality assumed Trait describes expressed behavior George glares at other men who talk to his girlfriend. He must be jealous.
7
What are traits? Traits are (continued): 4. Organized in a system 5. Consistent over settings and time
8
Trait Organization Comprehensive trait taxonomies assume traits exist at varying levels of abstraction and are organized hierarchically Major taxonomies –Eysenck –Cattell –Five factor model
9
Taxonomies of Personality Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model Extraversion-Intraversion Neuroticim-Emotional Stability Psychoticism
10
Hierarchy – Eysenck’s Extraversion Extraversion Sociability HR1 SR HR2 Impulsiveness HR1 SR Activity Liveliness Excitability
11
What are traits? Traits/behaviors are assumed to be consistent over settings and stable over time - Types of consistency Absolute Relative Situationally Relative
12
Types of Consistency - Absolute
13
Types of Consistency - Relative
14
Types of Consistency - Situationally Relative
15
Studying Traits Nomothetic – determine/use set of common traits. Analytic; allows for comparison Idiographic – determine each individual’s unique traits
16
Measuring Traits Objective Tests Traits are abstractions based on common features (e.g., extraversion; desks) Traits are hypothetical – can not measure directly - Translate trait into something measurable
17
Measuring Traits Objective Tests Many measures of same trait Examples All have error – variance not due to trait Trait Measure
18
Measuring Traits Objective Tests Different types of measures have different sources of error Trait measurement involves an epistemic inference: can not know with absolute certainty measure is tapping intended trait (due to its hypothetical nature)
19
Psychometrics Evaluating Objective Measure of Personality Traits
20
Measuring Traits Objective Tests Many measures of same trait Examples All have error – variance not due to trait Trait Measure
21
Measuring Traits Objective Tests Different types of measures have different sources of error Trait measurement involves an epistemic inference: can not know with absolute certainty measure is tapping intended trait (due to its hypothetical nature)
22
Reliability Does measure yield consistent scores over time, observers, and items –Estimates error component –Three types: Temporal Inter-rater Internal Consistency
23
Temporal Reliability Does measure yield consistent scores over time Assess: Test-Retest reliability coefficient –Measure trait at Time 1 and Time 1(less than 6 months) and compute correlation
24
Inter-rater reliability Does measure yield consistent scores over observers Required for measures with subjective component (e.g., projective, behavior) Assess with agreement rate Low agreement rate indicates high error (idiosyncratic observer perceptions)
25
Internal Consistency Consistency over items Increasing number of items increases temporal reliability; However, items need to measure same trait Assess: Split-half reliability coefficient –Correlate scores of two halves (randomly selected)
26
Internal Consistency continued Average item-total correlation –Average correlation of each item with total Example – Extroversion Item:Person 1 Person 2 Person 3 # friends30 5 20 # phone calls 35 2 4 # football games 6 5 10 # parties15 1 10 Total86 13 44
27
Validity Does measure tap intended trait? Reliability necessary but not sufficient for validity Trait measure Any trait Measure
28
Validity Types Construct Validity Theoretical; what is measure assessing? How does it relate to other constructs? Criterion Validity Practical; does measure serve intended purpose?
29
Construct Validity Convergent. Measure should correlate with other measures of same/similar construct. –Correlate using different assessment types E.g., Extroversion with peer reports, behavior Discriminant. Measure should not correlate with other measures of different constructs E.g., Extroversion with social anxiety, social desirability
30
Criterion Validity Predictive –Does measure predict future behavior related to measured trait? E.g., GRE, SAT, job placement Concurrent –Does measure differentiate between groups known to differ? E.g., Depression measure should discriminate between (diagnosed) depressed and controls
31
Strategies for Developing Trait Measures Theoretical Approach Group Contrast Approach Factor Analytic (Lexical + Statistical)
32
Measurement Strategies Theoretical Approach Starts with a theory which then determines which variables are important Freudian The Oral Personality The Anal Personality TheoryWould measure
33
Measurement Strategies Theoretical Approach Outline of steps 1. Starting point: Theory (e.g., MBTI; Jung) 2.Generate many items (expert opinion), face validity 3.Administer items to sample
34
Measurement Strategies Theoretical Approach Outline of steps 4. Examine internal consistency; discard poor items 5. Evaluate psychometric properties Weaknesses:
35
Measurement Strategies Group Contrast Approach Outline of steps 1 Starting point is a practical concern (e.g. psychopathology identification; MMPI) 2 Recruit respondents differing on dimensions 3 Develop items (little face validity)
36
Measurement Strategies Group Contrast Approach Outline of steps (continued) 4 Retain items that differentiate significantly between groups (concurrent validity) “I tease animals” Weaknesses
37
Measurement Strategies Factor Analytic (Lexical + Statistical) Outline of steps: 1 Starting point: lexicon (dictionary) Natural language assumption: All important individual differences have become encoded within the natural language 2 Reduce number of traits via semantic analysis
38
Measurement Strategies Factor Analytic Outline of steps (continued): 3 Factor analyze ratings; trait covariations define higher order factors Cattell and 16PF Five Factor Model
39
Correlation Matrix EngFine Arts Hist.Phil.Calc.ChemPhys Eng1.70.80.30.40 F. Art1.80.70.40.50 Hist1.90.30.40 Phil1.50.30.50 Calc1.80.90 Chem1.80 Phys 1
40
Hypothetical Factor Loadings Eng.Fine Arts Hist.Phil.Calc.ChemPhys. Factor 1.7.6.7.8-.1-.2.05 Factor 2.1.15.2.3.7.65.82 Factor 3.2-.1.15.18-.2.05.2
41
Hypothetical Factor Loadings Detach ed CoolWarm Hearted Easy Going Self Assur ed Confid ent Depres sed Worry ing Factor 1.9.85-.75-.65.02 -.1-.2 Factor 2.1.2.01.02.9.8-.7-.6 Factor 3 -.070.2-.15.1-.05.3.45
43
16pf Psychometric Properties Test-Retest Reliability (6 days); n = 146 A B C E F G H I.81 -.76.80.79.81.83.77 L M N O Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4.75.70.61.79.73.75.62.81
44
16pf Psychometric Properties Split-half Reliability (n = 218) A B C E F G H I.56 -.43.61.64.55.78.77 L M N O Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4.25.10.21.48.06.48.40.70
45
16pf Psychometric Properties Factor Loadings A B C E F G H I.77 -.62.71.66.75.63.71 L M N O Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4.63.58.59.75.66.62.58.75
46
16pf Psychometric Properties Criterion Validity – Predictive/Concurrent Moderately high C maintain better group morale High M have significantly more auto accidents High H prefer living in city center and travel
47
16pf Psychometric Properties Summary Test-retest moderately low; relatively few items Internal consistency (split-half) moderately low –Few items and emphasis on factor breadth (relatively high factor loadings)
48
Taxonomies of Personality Criticisms of Factor Analytic/Natural Language 1. Implicit personality theories 2. Method subjectivity; number/names of factors 3. Validity of Natural Language assumption 4. Validity of lay raters 5. Lack of correspondence between taxonomies
49
Taxonomies of Personality Five Factor Model Surgency or Extraversion Agreeableness Conscientiousness Emotional Stability Openness-Intellect
51
Taxonomies of Personality Circumplex Taxonomies of Personality Leary Circumplex Wiggins Circumplex
53
Critique of Trait Approach Self-report Measures –Social Desirability Evidence (e.g., voting) Handle –Measure –Reduce response time –Equate forced choice items
54
Critique of Trait Approach Walter Mischel – Traits don’t predict behavior –Trait-behavior; r <.3 –Behavior-behavior; r <.3 (see Hartshorn & May) –People are inconsistent and traits don’t predict behaviors
55
Hartshorn & May Behavioral Manifestations of Honesty CopyingPeepingAthletic Copying 1.0 Peeping.28 1.0 Athletic.20.06 1.0 Lying.31.15.0 Mean r =.21
56
Mischel’s critique continued Why continued use of traits? –Fundamental Attribution error –Traits illusory E.g.,
57
Responses to Mischel Are traits an illusion? Evidence against (unacquainted raters) Measurement Issue Aggregation – multiple measures – more reliable (e.g., class attendance) Interactionism
58
Differential effects of traits over settings For example: Anxiety Trait Anxiety: Situation:HighLow Threat 10 4 No threat 4 3
59
Theoretical Interactionism Snyder & Ickes Moderator Variable Approach –When do traits predict behaviors? (i.e., what variables moderate trait-behavior relationship?) Moderator Variables: Situation Strong vs. Weak
60
Moderators cont. Behaviors Prototypical (best exemplars) Traits Central Specific People Self monitoring Private Self consciousness
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.