Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 1 Radiative and EW Penguin B-Decays with the Belle Detector.

Published byDaniella Lacer Modified over 10 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 1 Radiative and EW Penguin B-Decays with the Belle Detector."— Presentation transcript:

1 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 1 Radiative and EW Penguin B-Decays with the Belle Detector Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 13-18 th Oct 2003  Introduction  Rare/Radiative Decays  Purely Leptonic Decays  Status & Perspective

2 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 2 Introduction and Motivation b -> s  and b -> sl + l - decays proceed via lflavour changing neutral current (FCNC) box and penguin diagrams b -> s  penguin: BR(b->s  3.5  10 -4 Not so rare actually…

3 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 3 b -> sl + l - penguin:b -> sl + l - box: + BR(b->sl + l -  em  BR(b->s  )  10 -6 !!! New particles can/will contribute quite significantly to the decay rates and various asymmetries quite significantly via the loops! => Ideal testing ground for SM and extensions (2HDM, MSSM, GUT, …?)

4 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 4 The KEK-B collider 3.5 GeV e + on 8 GeV e - L > (1.0 x 10 34 )/cm 2 /sec  L dt = 158 fb -1 140 fb -1 on resonance! Y (4S)

5 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 5 The Belle Detector 3 layer Silicon Vertex Detector Central Drift Chamber 8 GeV e - 3.5 GeV e + Aerogel Cherenkov Counter ToF counter Electromagnetic. Cal. (CsI crystals) 1.5T SC solenoid  and K L detection system

6 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 6 Continuum suppression BB and qq have different topologies! Typical variables for Bkg suppression: - Modified Fox Wolfram moments - Sphericity cos  sph ) - Thrust, cos(  thr ) - … => Build Fisher discriminant F for correlated variables => Form Likelihood for uncorrelated variables: L ( F,cos  B ) => Build Likelihood ratio: LR = L B / ( L B + L qq )  E = E * B – E * beam Kinematic Variables: M bc =   E *2 beam – |p * B | 2

7 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 7 B -> K *  Photon with 1.8 < E *  < 3.4 GeV,  0 /  veto K*(892) reconstructed in 4 final states: K +  -, K 0 s  0, K +  0, K 0 s  + with |M(K  ) – M(K * ) r | < 75 MeV/c 2 BKG suppression against e + e - -> qq(  ) -> LR(F,cos(  * B ))

8 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 8 BR(B -> K *  ) BR(B 0 -> K *0  ) = (40.9  2.1  1.9)  10 -6 SM  (69  21)  10 -6 BR(B + -> K *+  ) = (44.0  3.3  2.4)  10 -6 SM  (74  23 )  10 -6 Based on 78 fb -1 (  85 M BB-pairs)  E = E * B – E * beam M bc =   E *2 beam – |p * B | 2

9 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 9 A IS (B -> K *  ) Investigate Isospin asymmetry between B0 and B+:  0+ = BR(B 0 ->K *0  ) – BR(B + ->K *+  ) BR(B 0 ->K *0  ) + BR(B + ->K *+  ) B0B0 B+B+ B+B+ B0B0  0+ = (+0.3  4.5  1.8)% SM predicts +(5-10)%! B0B0 B+B+ = 1.083  0.017 [PDG2002] Assumes f + / f 0 = 1! f + / f 0 = 1.072  0.057 [PDG2002]

10 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 10 A CP (B -> K *  ) A CP = (-0.1  4.4  0.8)% In SM A CP should be smaller than 1% ! A CP = 1/(1-2w)  N(B->K *  ) - N(B->K *  ) N(B->K *  ) + N(B->K *  ) M bc =   E *2 beam – |p * B | 2

11 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 11 B ->  K  Photon with 2.0 < E *  < 2.7 GeV,  0 /  veto Select 2 charged K + charged/neutral K  ID: |M(KK) – M(  ) r | < 10 MeV/c 2 BKG suppression against e+e- -> qq(  ) -> LR( F,cos(  *B)) |  E|<400MeV M bc =   E *2 beam – |p * B | 2 B + ->  K +  yield = 21.6  5.6 B + ->  K + 

12 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 12 B ->  K  BR(B + ->  K +  ) = (3.4  0.9  0.4)  10 -6 -> 5.5  BR(B -> K*  )  10  BR(B + ->  K +  ) BR(B 0 ->  K 0  ) = (4.6  2.4  0.6)  10 -6 -> 3.3  < 8.3  10-6 (@90% C.L.) B 0 ->  K 0  is around the corner! and is a very promising candidate for time-dependent CPV analysis! Based on 90fb -1 (  96 M BB-pairs) significance =  -2 ln( L 0 / L max )

13 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 13 Belle Status of b->s  in Belle ChannelBR (  10 -6 )  L dtRef. =================================================== B -> X s  336  53  42 +50/-54 6 fb -1 [1] B 0 -> K *0  40.9  2.1  1.978 fb -1 [2] B + -> K *+  44.0  3.3  2.478 fb -1 [2] B + ->  K +  3.4  0.9  0.490 fb -1 [3] B + -> K +  +  -  24  5 +4/-229 fb -1 [3] B 0 -> K *0 2 (1430)  13  5  1 29 fb -1 [4] --------------------------------- B + ->  +  < 2.7 (@ 90% C.L.)78 fb -1 [5] B 0 ->  0  < 2.6 (@ 90% C.L.)78 fb -1 [5] B 0 ->  (783)  < 4.4 (@ 90% C.L.)78 fb -1 [5]

14 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 14 BaBar Status of b->s  ChannelBR (  10 -6 )  L dt =================================================== B -> X s  388  36  37 +43/-2354.6 fb -1 B 0 -> K *0  42.3  4.0  2.220.7 fb -1 B + -> K *+  38.3  6.2  2.220.7 fb -1 B 0 -> K *0 2 (1430)  12.2  2.5  1.181.4 fb -1 B + -> K *+ 2 (1430)  14.4  4.0  1.381.4 fb -1

15 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 15 Status of BR(b->s  ) B -> K * (892)  (12.5%) B -> K * 2 (1430)  (4%) B -> K *  (9%) B -> K  (9%) B -> K  (1%) Rest of b->s  (65±6%) K  n  (n>=3) Baryons +  (  13%) Mode with resonances, e.g. ,  ’ KKK  n  (  K  ) …

16 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 16 Future of b->s  Large theoretical uncertainties on BR! In ratios like A CP or Isospin asymmetries systematic uncertainties are expected to cancel (th./exp.) Current measurements are statistically limited! Also more modes accessible with more data! e.g. B 0 ->  K 0 S  promising candidate for time-dependent CPV analysis! Energy spectrum analysis -> transition dynamics (CKM) b->d  transitions not yet observed, large CPV effects could be expected!

17 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 17 B -> K l + l - & B -> K * l + l - K: charged or neutral K*: K +  -, K 0 s  +, K +  0 with |M(K  )-M(K * ) r |<75 MeV/c 2 Lepton pair: e or  p(e)>0.4 GeV/c, p(  )>0.7 GeV/c veto on J/ ,  (2S) M bc =   E *2 beam – |p * B | 2 yield = 35.8 +7.6+0.9 -6.9-1.1 yield = 37.9 +7.6+1.3 -6.9-1.2

18 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 18 B -> K l + l - & B -> K * l + l - BR(B -> Kl + l - ) = (4.8 +1.0/-0.9  0.3  0.1)  10 -7 BR(B -> K * l + l - ) = (11.7 +2.6/-2.4  0.8  0.4)  10 -7 Based on 140 fb -1 (  152 M BB-pairs)

19 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 19 BaBar Belle Status of B -> s l + l - ChannelBR (  10 -7 )  L dtRef. =================================================== B -> X s ll 61  14 +14/-11 60 fb -1 [6] B -> Kll4.8 +1.0/-0.9  0.3  0.1 140 fb -1 [7] B -> K * ll 11.5 +2.6/-2.4  0.8  0.2 140 fb -1 [7] ---------------------------------- B -> X s ll 63  16 +18/-15 82 fb -1 B -> Kll6.5 +1.4/-1.3  0.4 113 fb -1 B -> K * ll 8.8 +3.3/-2.9  1.0 113 fb -1 B -> K  7.0  10 -5 (@90% C.L.)51/80 fb -1

20 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 20 Status and Perspective: B -> s l + l - Next target: precise measurement of X s l + l - increase precision in q 2 A FB measurement

21 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 21 B0  l+l-B0  l+l- => Helicity suppressed 2-body decay in SM + BR in SM:B->  : (1.00  0.14)  10 -10 B->ee : (2.34  0.33)  10 -15 B->e  forbidden in SM, but possible in SUSY or Lepto-Quark models! Not observable, but enhancement by 2-3 orders of magnitude in 2HDM or Z mediated FCNC models.

22 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 22 B0  l+l-B0  l+l- Tight cut on leptons (e/  ): L > 0.9 BKG suppression with LR( F,cos(  * B )) Signal box: 5.27<M bc <5.29 GeV/c 2, |  E|<0.05GeV  E = E * B – E * beam M bc =   E *2 beam – |p * B | 2

23 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 23 ChannelBR (@90% C.L.)  L dt =================================================== B->ee< 1.9  10 -7 78 fb -1 Belle B->  < 1.6  10 -7 78 fb -1 Belle B->e  < 1.7  10 -7 78 fb -1 Belle ChannelBR (@90% C.L.)  L dt =================================================== B->ee< 1.9  10 -7 78 fb -1 Belle B->  < 1.6  10 -7 78 fb -1 Belle B->e  < 1.7  10 -7 78 fb -1 Belle B->  < 2.5  10 -7 113 pb -1 CDF B s ->  < 9.5  10 -7 113 pb -1 CDF B s ->  < 16  10 -7 100 pb -1 D0 --------------------------------------------------- B->e < 5.4  10 -6 60 fb -1 Belle B->  < 6.8  10 -6 60 fb -1 Belle B->  < 6.6  10 -6 81 fb -1 Babar B->  < 4.1  10 -4 81 fb -1 Babar Status of B  ll

24 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 24 SM prediction for purely leptonic/radiative B-decays: B->  :  3  10 -8 B->  : > 3  10 -8 B->  :  1  10 -10 B->  :  few  10 -10 B->ee :  3  10 -15 B->ee  :  few  10 -10 B->  :  7  10 -5 B->  : > 7  10 -5 B->  :  3  10 -7 B->  :  few  10 -6 B->e  :  7  10 -12 B->e  :  few  10 -6 Any significant increase in these BR might give hint for new physics Some of these modes should be accessible with the B-factories! Future? B  ll(  )

25 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 25 What have we achieved? Radiative B-Decays in PDG 2000: charged modesneutral modes ----------------------------------------------------- K * (892)  (5.7±3.3) 10 -5 (4.0±1.9) 10 -5 K 1 (1270)  < 7.3 10 -3 < 7.0 10 -3 K * 2 (1400)  < 2.2 10 -3 < 4.3 10 -3 K * 2 (1430)  < 1.4 10 -3 < 4.0 10 -4 K * (1680)  < 1.9 10 -3 < 2.0 10 -3 K * 3 (1780)  < 5.5 10 -3 < 1.0 10 -2 K * 4 (2045)  < 9.9 10 -3 < 4.3 10 -3 Quite dramatic improvement in our knowledge of radiative B-decays

26 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 26 Summary Since last year new modes to B -> X s  and B -> X s l + l - added -> first observation of B ->  K  and B -> K * l + l - BR and asymmetries are in good agreement with SM, but many results are statistically limited We are entering the exciting phase of precision measurements (e.g. A FB, q 2 dependence in K (*) ll ) just started Radiative Penguin decays are ideal testing ground for SM and new physics … but you knew that… Need more data to fix some of the important parameters in EW/radiative penguin transitions Many interesting discoveries are still ahead…

27 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 27 There are lots of them…

28 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 28 List of References [1] Phys.Lett. B511, 151 (2001) [2] Abs.537, BELLE-CONF-0319 Preliminary [3] Phys.Rev.Lett 98, 231801 (2002) [4] Abs.542, BELLE-CONF-0322 Preliminary [5] Moriond 2003 Preliminary [6] PRL 90, 021801 (2003) [7] hep-ex/0309032, submitted to PRL [8] hep-ex/0309069, submitted to PRD

29 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 29 Low energy eff. Hamiltonian H eff   10 i=1 C i (  ) O i (  )  (b->s  ) = 1/32  4 G 2 F  em m 5 b |V* ts V tb | 2 (|C 7 eff | 2 + O(1/m b,1/m c ))) => Access to |C 7 |

30 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 30 Low energy eff. Hamiltonian H eff   10 i=1 C i (  ) O i (  )  (b->s  )  |V* ts V tb | 2 |C 7 eff | 2 => Access to |C 7 | Interesting observables: BR, A CP,  spectrum  (b->s  +  - )/ds  |V * ts V tb | 2 O(s, |C 7 eff | 2, |C 8 eff | 2,|C 10 eff | 2, C 7 effR Re(C 9 eff )) => Access to |C 7 |, |C 9 |, |C 10 |, sgn(C 7 ) Interesting observables: BR, A FB, q 2 distribution s = q 2 /m 2 b = (M(  +  - )/m b ) 2

31 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 31 Particle ID & Kinematic Variables  E = E * B – E * beam K/  separation: - dE/dx from CDC - light yield from ACC - t from ToF e ID: - dE/dx from CDC - light yield from ACC - t from ToF - CsI (ECL)  ID: - hits in KLM  ID: - 16X 0 CsI (ECL) Kinematic Variables: M bc =   E *2 beam – |p * B | 2

32 Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 32

Download ppt "Radiative and EW Penguin Decays  Tom Ziegler  Beauty 2003  Pittsburgh, 13-18 th Oct 2003 1 Radiative and EW Penguin B-Decays with the Belle Detector."

Similar presentations

23, June, 2005Beauty2005, Assisi, Italy Electroweak Penguin decays at Belle Akimasa Ishikawa KEK.

23, June, 2005Beauty2005, Assisi, Italy Electroweak Penguin decays at Belle Akimasa Ishikawa KEK.
Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.

Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Electroweak and Radiative Penguin Transitions from B Factories Paoti Chang National Taiwan University 2 nd KIAS-NCTS Joint Workshop on Particle Physics,

Electroweak and Radiative Penguin Transitions from B Factories Paoti Chang National Taiwan University 2 nd KIAS-NCTS Joint Workshop on Particle Physics,
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.

Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
August 12, 2000DPF 20001 Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.

August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
Search for 7-prong  Decays Ruben Ter-Antonyan on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Tau04 Workshop, Sep 14, 2004, Nara, Japan Outline:  Introduction 

Search for 7-prong  Decays Ruben Ter-Antonyan on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Tau04 Workshop, Sep 14, 2004, Nara, Japan Outline:  Introduction 
Andrey Golutvin Moriond 20071 Prospects of search for New Physics in B decays at LHC Andrey Golutvin ITEP / Moscow - In CP - violation - In rare decays.

Andrey Golutvin Moriond Prospects of search for New Physics in B decays at LHC Andrey Golutvin ITEP / Moscow - In CP - violation - In rare decays.
EPS, July 2003 1  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -

EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty 2005 - Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.

Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
1 Rare Decays of B Hadrons at CDF Matthew Jones October 3, 2005.

1 Rare Decays of B Hadrons at CDF Matthew Jones October 3, 2005.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,

16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
J. Whitmore BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 KTeV Results: K L    ( =e, , ) BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 Julie Whitmore, Fermilab l Physics Motivation - Direct.

J. Whitmore BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 KTeV Results: K L    ( =e, , ) BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 Julie Whitmore, Fermilab l Physics Motivation - Direct.
Thesis Defense of Luminda Kulasiri Dept. of Physics, University of Cincinnati 05.09.2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B → D h at Belle *S*S.

Thesis Defense of Luminda Kulasiri Dept. of Physics, University of Cincinnati Search for exclusive two body decays of B → D h at Belle *S*S.
The physics of b s l + l - : 2004 and beyond Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara January 19, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop University.

The physics of b s l + l - : 2004 and beyond Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara January 19, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop University.
Direct CP and Rare B A B AR BEAUTY 05 - Assisi Jamie Boyd Bristol University On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration.

Direct CP and Rare B A B AR BEAUTY 05 - Assisi Jamie Boyd Bristol University On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration.
DPF-2006 1 Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.

DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.

Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Baryonic decays of B mesons. H.Kichimi, June28-July3, 2004 1 Baryonic decays of B mesons H. Kichimi Representing the Belle collaboration BEACH June28-July3,

Baryonic decays of B mesons. H.Kichimi, June28-July3, Baryonic decays of B mesons H. Kichimi Representing the Belle collaboration BEACH June28-July3,
At Belle Katsumi Senyo Nagoya University May 16~18, 2002 Flavor Physics and CP Violation ~ Exclusive and Inclusive Analysis Results.

At Belle Katsumi Senyo Nagoya University May 16~18, 2002 Flavor Physics and CP Violation ~ Exclusive and Inclusive Analysis Results.
New Particles at BELLE Beauty 2005 Assisi Spectroscopy and new Particles F. Mandl There is an impressive list of new particles in the charm sector discovered.

New Particles at BELLE Beauty 2005 Assisi Spectroscopy and new Particles F. Mandl There is an impressive list of new particles in the charm sector discovered.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google