Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Steve Lewis, MA, CSCS Fitness Director.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Steve Lewis, MA, CSCS Fitness Director."— Presentation transcript:

1 Steve Lewis, MA, CSCS Fitness Director

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10  Of Russian origin (girya)  First mention in Russian dictionary in 1704  Used as a standard measure of grain and dry goods  Traditional Russian measure –  1 pood = 16 kgs = 35 lbs  1.5 pood = 24 kgs = 53lbs  2 pood = 32 kgs = 70 lbs

11 Why is a Kettlebell unique? - Shape and size allows for swinging or accelerating that creates “virtual force” - Very powerful training effect from a relatively light weight - Offset center of gravity allows unique loading of shoulder joint on overhead lifts - Research indicates kettlebells can improve many components of fitness: dynamic strength, ranges of endurance, body composition, hypertrophy, flexibility

12

13  Drills are divided into 2 categories:  Explosion – ballistic drills, typically done for higher reps to improve power output and / or conditioning levels  Grinds – slower, “traditional” type strength drills

14  EXPLOSION DRILLS include:  1. Swing

15  2. Snatch

16  3. Clean

17  GRIND DRILLS include:  1. Squat

18  2. Press

19  3. Windmill

20  4. Turkish Get-Up

21

22

23  Oxygen Cost of Kettlebell Swings (Farrar, et al)  10 college-aged males used the 2 hand swing technique with 16 kg kettlebell (KB) for 12 minutes  Averaged 265 + 68 swings  Average VO2 of 34.3 + 5.67 ml-kg -1 -min -1  Average HR 165 + 13 bpm  Average % HR max – 86.8 + 6%  Conclusion – “Continuous KB swings can impart a metabolic response of sufficient intensity to increase VO2 max.”

24  Kettlebells: Twice the Results in Half the Time? (Porcari, et al) – ACE sponsored research  10 volunteers (both male and female) ages 29-46 yrs with previous KB training experience  Subjects performed a 20 minute interval KB workout.

25 RESULTS MEANRANGE HR (bpm) 164+14.7128-180 % of HR max 93+4.586-99 VO2 max  ml-kg -1 -min -1 31.6+3.7124.6+36.6 % of VO2 max 78+8.067-91 Kcals / min 13.6+2.2110-18

26  Conclusion:  HR and VO2 responses where significantly higher when compared to traditional strength training  Interval KB training is highly effective for improving aerobic capacity!

27  Kettlebell Swing, Snatch, Bottoms-Up Carry: Back and Hip Muscle Activation, Motion and Low Back Loads. (McGill, et al)  Goal of this research was to quantify low back loads various swings and carries.  7 college-aged males performed KB swings, snatches and bottoms –ups carries while EMG and kinematic data was collected.

28  Results:  KB swings showed unique lumbar (L4-L5) loading patterns that are opposite in polarity to “traditional” lifting or loading.  May explain the anecdotal evidence for KB swings and snatches restoring and enhancing low back function.

29  Results:  KB swings showed unique lumbar (L4-L5) loading patterns that are opposite in polarity to “traditional” lifting or loading.  May explain the anecdotal evidence for KB swings and snatches restoring and enhancing low back function.

30 Kettlebells: 1. improve strength 2. improve cardiovascular conditioning 3. improve core strength 4. may reduce low back pain 5. ARE FUN!!!!!!!!

31 www.kettlebellscience.com www.dragondoor.com

32


Download ppt "Steve Lewis, MA, CSCS Fitness Director."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google