Download presentation
1
For: Bosch Rexroth – Rineer Hydraulics
GRINDING BASICS Presented by Dale Savington For: Bosch Rexroth – Rineer Hydraulics
2
Cylindrical Grinding Processes
Machine Requirements (Utilizing CBN) Abrasives Properties of Abrasives
3
Superabrasives Bonds Mechanics of Grinding Coolant Truing & Dressing
4
CYLINDRICAL PROCESSES (GRINDING BETWEEN CENTERS)
5
Conventional Plunge / Face Grinding
Down-Feed (face bump grind) Q’ (Prime) 2.14 (0.2) + Wheel Velocity S.F.P.M. 8,500 + m/sec. 43 + High volume of coolant to get into grinding zone
6
Conventional Traverse Grinding
Cross –Feed (Traverse) only Stock Removal (in-feed depth) 0.0” to mm (0.0007”) ≥ 10% of abrasive Ø / pass Traverse rate 10 – 25% of wheel width per rotation of part Wheel Velocity S.F.P.M. 8,500 + m/sec. 43 + Finish Grinding
7
Peel (“Quick Point”) Grinding
Multiple grinding functions Wheel face configuration Wheel Velocity S.F.P.M. 17,000 + m/sec. 86 + Easier coolant delivery into grinding zone (narrow contact area)
8
Cylindrical Grinding Plunge
Q Prime (Q’) = work piece diameter x 3.14 (π) x in-feed rate Example: Work piece diameter = 25.4mm (1”) In-feed rate = 4.039mm/min. (0.159”/minute) Q’ then equals: (25.4 x 3.14 x 4.039)/60 = 5.37 mm3/mm· sec. 1 x 3.14 x = 0.5 in3/in· min. Therefore: (5.37/(3.14 x 25.4)) x 60 = 4.039mm/min. 0.5/(3.14 x 1”)= 0.159”/min. infeed rate Note: (mm3/mm· sec.) to (in3/in· min.) conversion of 10.75
9
Surface Grinding
10
Conventional Grinding
Wheel Speed = S l o w Stock Removal = Light Fast
11
Creep Feed Wheel Speed = S l o w Stock Removal = Heavy S l o w
12
HEDG (High Efficient Deep Grinding)
Wheel Speed = Fast Stock Removal = Heavy Fast
13
Surface Grinding Example: In-Feed per pass= 0.0508mm (0.002”)
Q Prime (Q’) =In-feed rate/pass x Traverse rate/min. Example: In-Feed per pass= mm (0.002”) Traverse rate per min.= 3,810mm (3.81m)/min. (150” (12.5’)/minute) Q’ then equals: ( x 3,810)/60 = mm3/mm· sec. 0.002 x 150 = 0.3 in3/in· min. Therefore: (3.225/(0.0508) x 60 = 3,810mm/min. traverse rate 0.3/(0.002”)= 150”/min. traverse rate Note: (mm3/mm· sec.) to (in3/in· min.) conversion of 10.75
14
MACHINE REQUIREMENTS
15
Parts will Mirror Machines Rigidity
Machine Rigidity Slides Spindle’s Centers Head Stock Tail Stock Base Parts will Mirror Machines Rigidity
16
Kilowatts! Wheel Spindle POWER!
Wheel spindle power per 25.4mm (1”) of wheel to work contact Conventional Abrasives = 3.75 Kw (5 H.P.) CBN Abrasives = 7.5 Kw (10 H.P.) (HEDG) = Kw (25 H.P.) Peel – depends on contact area, material and stock removal
17
Spindle Integrity Run-Out Out of Balance
18
Wheel Balance (Dynamic vs Static)
Dynamic Balance – real time Static Balance Wheel Balance (Dynamic vs Static) Portable Dynamic Balance
19
Wheel Balance (Dynamic vs Static)
Static Balance allows balance in stationary position off the spindle. Dynamic Balance is continuous balance on the spindle at working rotating speeds. Wheel Balance (Dynamic vs Static)
20
Acoustic Sensors Dressing:
Sound of dresser touching wheel through coolant. Complete contact = dressed wheel Other uses: Picture of grinding process Crash prevention Acoustic Sensors
21
Machine Requirements (Maximizing Grinding Process)
Rigidity Coolant Flow Spindle power Smooth Transitional Plumbing Wheel Velocity Coolant Tank Capacity Rotary Dresser 1. In process gaging 2. Automatic loading 3. Chillers 4. Coolants should be Water soluable oil (.3%) or straight oil 5. Coolant flow meters, temperature monitors, (Discuss Searcy Project) Coolant with lubricity Acoustic Sensors Dynamic Balancing
22
ABRASIVES
23
What affects Abrasive Decision?
Ferrous Materials Non-Ferrous Materials Fatigue Concerns (Potential thermal damage) Dimensional Tolerances Process Controls Production Numbers
24
Types of Abrasives Aluminum Oxide Silicon Carbide
Cubic Boron Nitride (CBN) Diamond
25
Abrasive Selection Ferrous Materials Non-Ferrous Materials
Cubic Boron Nitride (CBN) Diamond Silicon Carbide Aluminum Oxide
26
PROPERTIES OF ABRASIVES
27
Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3) For Grinding Ferrous Materials
Thermal Conductivity (W/mOK) = 29 Hardness on Knoop Scale (kg/mm2) =
28
Non-Ferrous Materials
Silicon Carbide (Si,C) For Grinding Non-Ferrous Materials Thermal Conductivity (W/mOK) = 400 Hardness on Knoop Scale (kg/mm2) = 2700
29
Cubic Boron Nitride (CBN) (B,N)
For Grinding Ferrous Materials Hardness on Knoop Scale (kg/mm2) = 4500 Thermal Conductivity (W/mOK) = 1300
30
Non-Ferrous Materials
Diamond (C) For Grinding Non-Ferrous Materials Thermal Conductivity (W/mOK) = 2000 Hardness on Knoop Scale (kg/mm2) = 8000
31
Review Knoop Thermal Hardness Conductivity Aluminum Oxide 1400-2100 29
Silicon Carbide Cubic Boron Nitride (CBN) Diamond
32
The Puzzle Why Not Diamond?
Diamond + Ferrous Material + Heat = REACTION Note: Silicon Carbide has similar reaction
33
SUPERABRASIVES
34
What are Superabrasives?
Diamond Cubic Boron Nitride (CBN) Borazon Show overhead on make up of Diamond and CBN
35
What makes Superabrasives Super?
Hardness - (Resistance to wear) Thermal Conductivity- (The ability to absorb heat) Flexibility- (one wheel for many applications) Be prepared to show overh ead of Properties of Superabrasives Hardness for CBN =4700Knoop Diamond =7000 Knoop Alumimum Oxide = Knoop Silicon Carbide =2700 Knoop Thermal Conductivity for CBN =1300 Diamond =2000 Aluminium Oxide =29 Silicon Carbide =400 Grinding Ratio for M2 Steel =229 Volume of Work / Volume of wheel T15 Steel =150 D2 Steel =217 Wheel Life- (100 + times Conventional Abrasives)
36
Some Advantages (For Superabrasives)
Decreased Cycle Time Reduced Dressing Reduced Gaging More Consistent Parts (Less Scrap) Reduced Time for Wheel Changes Reduced Coolant Changes Reduced Filter Changes Reduced Coolant Disposal Costs Less Swarf Contamination
37
Conventional Abrasives Construction
Conventional Layer = full area of wheel Vitrified Bond Resin Bond Rubber Bond Shellac Bond Wheel 1. If a grinding wheel is 24 inch in diameter with a 12 inch hole The entire wheel from O.D. to hole is conventional abrasive compared to the 1/8 to 1/4 inch section for Superabrasives. 2. This small section is going to last from time a conventional wheel
38
Superabrasive Construction
Superabrasive Layer = 3mm (1/8”) to 12.7mm (1/2”) Wheel Core Resin Bond Metal Bond Vitrified Bond 1. If a grinding wheel is 24 inch in diameter with a 12 inch hole The entire wheel from O.D. to hole is conventional abrasive compared to the 1/8 to 1/4 inch section for Superabrasives. 2. This small section is going to last from time a conventional wheel
39
BONDS
40
Grinding Matrix Vitrified Wheel
Grain Pore Bond Chip
41
Grinding Wheel Bond Systems
Sintered Vitrified Resin , Metal & Bonds Abrasive + Bond = Wheel
42
Grinding Wheel Bond Systems
Open Structure (Low fired) Vitrified Bonds Abrasive + Bond + Pores = Wheel
43
Grinding Wheel Bond Systems
Plated Wheels (Single Layer) Wheel body Cathode (-) Electrolyte (Nickle Solution) Abrasive Anode (+) Plated Wheel Cut-A-Way
44
Mechanics of Grinding
45
Abrasive wear Bond Abrasive Fracture wear Chip Cut a way of wheel
46
Abrasive wear Conventional Abrasive (one grain) Attritious wear
(Rubbing) Work Piece Abrasive wear
47
Abrasive wear Conventional Abrasive (one grain) Fracture wear
Work Piece Abrasive wear
48
Abrasive wear Conventional Abrasive (one grain) Fracture wear
Work Piece Abrasive wear
49
CBN Abrasive (one grain) Attritious wear Work Piece Abrasive wear
50
Standard Markings Conventional Abrasives
Abrasive Type Abrasive Size Abrasive (combination) Hardness (Grade) Structure (Pore) Bond A C SG30 60 120 80 24 1 2 J K L R 6 12 10 V B
51
Standard Markings Superabrasives
Abrasive Type Abrasive Size Hardness (Grade) Concentration Bond BN D 140 240 120 J k L 100 75 150 B M V Superabrasives are always combinations 120/140, 80/100 etc. Calculating concentration take number and divide by 4 Example 100 ÷ 4 = 25% by volume of abrasive in wheel
52
Type, Flow, Pressure & Nozzle Design
Coolant Type, Flow, Pressure & Nozzle Design
53
Coolant Types Water, Water Soluble Oils, Straight Oils
Specific Gravity of each & traits for grinding: Water = 1 SG (Issue – lack of Lubricity) Water Soluble Oil = 1 SG (Issues – Foaming & bacteria) Straight & Synthetic Oils = SG (Issues – Heat & Disposal) ( Specific Gravity (SG not a factor in calculations) )
54
Particle Distribution
Coolant Condition Filtration & Particle Distribution Tank Size & Coolant Temp. Chemistry (Lubricity)
55
Coolant Pressure Equal Wheel Velocity
Bernoulli’s Equation for Pressure ΔP (Bar) = SG x Vj2 / 200 Where:Vj2 = (M/s)2 Example: Wheel velocity – 43.3M/s (8,500 S.F.P.M.) Then: 1 x (43.3)2 / 200 = 9.4 Bar Bar conversion Bar x = 136 psi
56
Bernoulli’s Equations
58
Copyright © 2013 [Dale Savington]. All Rights Reserved
59
Copyright © 2013 [Dale Savington]. All Rights Reserved
60
Coolant Flow Coolant Velocity = Wheel Velocity
61
“P” Line /Rim Section
65
TRUING & DRESSING
66
The Difference Between Truing & Dressing
67
Truing Resin & Metal Bonds
68
Dressing Resin & Metal Bonds
69
Truing & Dressing Plated Wheels
70
Truing & Dressing Vitrified Bonded (CBN Wheels)
71
Examples of Rotary Dressers
72
Direction for Dressing with rotary Dressers
Preferred (opens wheel) Closes Wheel
73
Truing & Dressing (Depth or In-Feed)
Conventional Abrasives – Aluminum Oxide ≤ mm (0.0007”) per pass Ceramic Abrasives – Seeded Gel (SG) ≤ 0.005mm (0.0002”) per pass CBN Abrasives ≤ mm (0.0001”) per pass Truing & Dressing (Depth or In-Feed)
74
Truing & Dressing (Traverse Rate)
Starting Parameters 0.1mm (0.004”) per revolution of wheel Assuming 0.5mm (0.020”) radius dresser Truing & Dressing (Traverse Rate) Faster traverse rate creates rougher finish Slower traverse rate creates finer finish
75
CBN vs Conventional (Surface Finish – plunge grinding only)
Conventional Grinding Surface Finish = Grit Size CBN Grinding: Surface Finish = Diamond Overlap CBN vs Conventional (Surface Finish – plunge grinding only)
76
“Automotive Valve Seats”
Nozzle increased production by 42% (762mm/min to >1,065mm/min.) + decrease dress amounts. “Automotive Valve Seats” 508mm x 458mm x 304.8mm Vitrified CBN wheel Thru-Feed Grinding Metal bond rotary dresser Dr. Webster Nozzle Each orifice is an oval 4mm 19 total orifices
77
Hard Tuning Shafts to see if it was cost affective
Cost was prohibitive because of tool life and change times
78
the end
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.