Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Peter Ferket Charles Stark North Carolina State University

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Peter Ferket Charles Stark North Carolina State University"— Presentation transcript:

1 Peter Ferket Charles Stark North Carolina State University
Batching and Mixing Peter Ferket Charles Stark North Carolina State University

2 Batching & Mixing Objective
Accurately weigh each ingredient Minimize batching time Produce a feed that has a uniform distribution of nutrients and medications

3 Equipment

4 Batching Equipment Micro Bin Systems Tote Bag Systems Scales
Major Minor Weigh Buggy

5 Scales

6 Batching – Scale Fill Test
Major & Minor Scales Fill test evaluates full range of load cells Add test weights Record weight Remove weights Fill scale to 1/3 capacity Fill scale to 2/3 capacity Document results 2/3 1/3 200 lb

7 Batching – Manual Weighing
Weigh Buggy Platform Scale

8 Feed Mill Designs Pre-batch grind Post-mix grind Post-pellet blend
Post-batch grind

9 Batching – Micro System
Multiple Hopper Scale Single Hopper Scale

10 Batching - Totes Totes & Scales Tote Transfer

11 Batching Sequence Major Scale:
Computer draws multiple bins to the major scale. Computer switches to one bin and jogs at the end of the each ingredient. Batching System Micro Scale Minor Scale Major Scale Major Ingredients Corn/Wheat SBM Midds DDGS

12 Batching Sequence Minor Scale Fill:
Batching System Minor Scale Fill: Computer draws single bins to the minor scale and jogs at the end of the each ingredient. Major Scale Minor Scale Micro Scale Minor Ingredients Dical Limestone Salt Lysine

13 Batching Sequence Micro Scale Fill:
Batching System Micro Scale Fill: Computer draws single bins to the micro scale and jogs at the end of the each ingredient. Micro Scale Minor Scale Major Scale Micro Ingredients Vitamins Trace Minerals Medications Amino Acids

14 Batching Sequence Scale Considerations: Major Scale 80-90%
Batching System Scale Considerations: Major Scale 80-90% Minor Scale 10-15% Micro Scale < 5% Micro Scale Minor Scale Major Scale

15 Batching Sequence Major Scale Discharges First
Batching System Major Scale Discharges First Fills the dead space between the ribbons and tub. Micro Scale Minor Scale Major Scale

16 Batching Sequence Minor Scale Discharges after a 5-10 second delay
Batching System Minor Scale Discharges after a 5-10 second delay Minor ingredients mix with the major ingredients Micro Scale Minor Scale Major Scale

17 Batching Sequence Micro Scale Discharges after a 0-5 second delay
Batching System Micro Scale Discharges after a 0-5 second delay Micro tub or scales open and the material is transferred with a drag conveyor Micro Scale Minor Scale Major Scale

18 Batching Mixing Time Horizontal Double Ribbon 30-60 second Dry Mix
second Wet Mix Batching Batching System Micro Scale Minor Scale Liquid Addition Volumetric (meter) Gravimetric (weighed) Liquid Ingredients: Fat Molasses Choline Amino acids Major Scale

19 Batching Sequence Discharge Process
Mixer opens and material drops to a surge hopper Batching/Mixing System Micro Scale Minor Scale Major Scale

20 Batch Cycle Batch Cycle – 4 mins Weighing 2 min Mixing 3 min
Discharge 1 min Mixing 3 min Weighing 2 min Discharge 1 min Mixing 3 min

21 Automation System

22 Batch Production Report

23 Mixing equipment

24 Horizontal Ribbon Mixer

25 Double Ribbon Mixer – Mixing Zones
Feed Flow Main Mixing Zone Main Mixing Zone Typical mix time = 3-4 min

26 Double Ribbon Horizontal Mixer

27 Paddle Mixer

28 Paddle Mixer – Mixing Zones
Feed Flow Main Mixing Main Mixing Some Mixing Some Mixing Main Mixing Main Mixing

29 Horizontal Paddle Mixer

30 Rotating Drum Mixer – Mixing Zones
Main Mixing Zone

31 Drum Mixer

32 Ribbon Mixer - Counterpoise

33 Ribbon Mixer – Counterpoise Mixing Zone

34 Forberg Fluid Bed Mixer

35 Forberg Mixer

36 Vertical Mixer

37 Vertical Mixer – Mixing Zones
Main Mixing Zone Main Mixing Zone Main Mixing Zone

38 Vertical Mixer

39 Mixer Problems Material on ribbons Material on paddles

40 Batching & Mixing Problems
Fat sprayed on ribbon and shaft Fat lumps created by poor liquid application and mixing

41 Mixer uniformity analysis

42 Factors Affecting Uniformity
Particle Shape Spherical, square, flat Particle Size Different particle size can separate during the handling process Density Heavy particles may settle out during conveying and discharge to a bin Static Charge Particles will adhere to equipment if not properly grounded Hydroscopicity Vitamins or Feed Additives may absorb water Adhesiveness Fats or molasses may adhere to equipment

43 What Represents the Goal of Mixing?
Segregated Mix Perfect Mix Random Mix

44 Weighing Ingredients Correctly?
Weighing Accuracy Feed mills overdose their ingredients by about 1.5% Average inaccuracy in dosing within feed mills ranges from % About 85% of the calls are weighted with an error of ± 5% and about 90% are within ± 10% of called weight

45 Distribution of weighing errors

46 Overdosing and weighing errors error within mill (a-n) across all observations

47 Are You Weighing Ingredients Correctly?
Weighing Precision Variation in weighing within ingredients, expressed as Coefficient of Variation (CV) Weighing CV ranges on average of about 5% ( % CV)

48 Causes of Weighing Variation
Hand-weighing ingredients People tend to overdose by about 1% when ingredients are weighed by hand Micro-ingredients and premix dose errors Micro-ingredients scales seem to be more variable than macro-ingredient scales because of the size of the call Descrepancies between call size and scale resolution Average weighing discrepancies in feed mill is about 2% but can range up to 20% For example, requesting 11.3 lbs of an ingredient when the scale has a resolution of only 2 lbs. Ratio of call size to scale resolution Weighing errors and CV decreases as the call size to scale resolution increases. For example, a call for 100 lbs to be weighed on a scale with a resolution of 5 lbs gives a call/scale resolution of 20, where as a call for the same 100 lbs on a scale with a resolution of 2 lbs gives a ratio of 50.

49 Weighing errors and CVs for different call size to scale resolutions
Call Size:Scale Resolution Ratio Weighing Error, % CV, % 10 4.0 11.4 100 1.0 3.6 1000 0.3 1.1

50 Mixer Uniformity Analysis
Mixer Markers Single nutrient/ingredient Salt Synthetic Amino Acids (Lysine or Methonine) Dry Mix Uniformity Economical Accurate and precise at inclusion level Test twice per year Ten samples from the same batch of feed Sample mixer or a point closest to the discharge

51 Mixer Uniformity Analysis
Sampling Points Mixer or Surge samples provides information on dead spots in the mixer or mixer maintenance issues Sampling during the discharge process provides representative samples of the feed as it moves through the system.

52 Feed Quality Assurance – Mixer Test
Sample mixer OR Sample surge Sample discharge conveyor

53 Mixer Uniformity Analysis - Quantab™

54 Mixer Uniformity Analysis - Quantab™
Weigh 10 gram sample of feed into a dish Scale +/- 0.1 g

55 Mixer Uniformity Analysis - Quantab™
Fold filter paper to create a cone

56 Mixer Uniformity Analysis - Quantab™
Measure out 90 ml of HOT distilled water SAFETY Hot Water Burns!!

57 Mixer Uniformity Analysis
Mix sample and water for 30 sec wait and re-mix for 30 sec. Place filter paper cone in cup Place Quantab strip into the filter cone Indicator strip at the top will turn black when complete

58 Mixer Uniformity Analysis - Quantab™
Read highest point on the strip Determine NaCl level based on the calibration chart on the bottle. Multiple by 10 (10:1 dilution)

59 Mixer Uniformity Analysis Calculations
Calculation of Mixer CV Mean of samples Standard deviation of samples CV % = standard deviation x 100 mean

60 Mixer Uniformity Analysis Calculations

61 Mixer Uniformity Evaluation
CV RATING CORRECTIVE ACTION < 10% Excellent None 10-15% Good Increase mixing time by 25-30% 15-20% Fair Increase mixing time by 50%, look for worn equipment, overfilling, or sequence of ingredient addition 20% + Poor Possible combination of all the above Consults extension personnel or feed equipment manufacturer

62 Double Ribbon Mixer – RPM’s

63 Double Ribbon Mixer – Worn Ribbons

64 Double Ribbon Mixer – Wrong Rotation

65 Double Ribbon Mixer – Build-Up

66 Questions


Download ppt "Peter Ferket Charles Stark North Carolina State University"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google