1. - Description of scenarios -No treatment -Status quo -Resilience - Preliminary model results - Management and decision making in Envision

2. Status QuoResilienceNo Treatment Acreage targets Current levelsBased on historic fire return intervals NA Amount of management ~ 1.4% per year~ 3.4% per yearNone Core management activities Thinning Prescribed fire Mowing and grinding Thinning Prescribed fire Lodgepole clear- cuts None Planning areas Prioritized by basal area Prioritized by fire hazard NA Management areas Existing allocations applied (e.g. wilderness, LSR, CFLR, WUI) Wilderness and PVTs applied NA ActorsStatus quo for all actors Applied to federal management No treatment for all actors

3. Landscape View of Management, Year One Resilience Scenario Status Quo Scenario

4. Results

5. Stand Replacing Fire, 10 replicates ~ size of Davis Lake fire ~ size of Pole Creek fire

6. Cumulative Wildfire by Scenario

7. High Severity Fire by Scenario and Potential Vegetation Group Arid landsMMCDMCPPine

8. Cumulative Timber Volume by Scenario, 40 years

9. Habitat Spotted Owl average level of moderate and high suitability habitat, 10 replicates Western Bluebird average level of moderate and high suitability habitat, 10 replicates

10. Disturbance Resilience Scenario Spotted Owl Habitat

11. DisturbanceSpotted Owl Habitat

12. Disturbance

14. ThinningPrescribe fire Mow & grind Clear- cut Salvage log Firewise homesite Forest Servicexxxxx Warm Springsxxxxx Corporate forestland owners xxxxx Non- industrial private xxx x Homeowners x Actors

15. Empirical Econometric Models Homeowners Firewise = f ( perceived wildfire risk, capacity, legal requirement ) Non-industrial private forestland owners Harvest = f ( basal area, parcel size ) Fuel treatment = f ( trees per hectare, fire within 10 km in past 5 years, insect infestation within 2 km in past 5 years, presence of a residential structure )

16. Large Landowner Decisions Targets, constraints, and preferences Private corporate Acreage target, minimum tree size, harvest rotation, basal area. Warm Springs Acreage targets based on forest type and management zones, harvest rotation, and stand age. Forest Service Acreage targets by district, constraints and preferences vary by management activity

17. Large Landowner Decision Making Scenario – Resilience Scenario - Status Quo Activitythinningprescribed fire thinningprescribed fire Amount (acres)24,600 10,4002,568 Planning Areas (ranked by) fire hazard basal area Size of Activity Units (acres) Varies by PVT 70100 Where - Preferences (rank) Ponderosa pine+++ Large trees++ -+ Closed layered DMC +++++---++-- Closed layered MMC +++------ WUI00++++++ LSR00----- CFLR++++++++ Where - Constraints (0/1) WildernessNoYesNo Ponderosa pineYes Moist mixed conifer Yes No Low cover and one layer NoYesNoYes Photo courtesy of TNC Photo courtesy of Patrick Shannon, SNW

18. 3 5 -4 1 8 4 2 1 2 3 43

19. Next Steps -Final model testing -Use model to test hypotheses on Bend project area -Run model on whole project area Conclusion -Model flexibility -Data -Many ways to build understanding of landscape change