Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRachael Williams Modified over 9 years ago
1
Robin S.S. Kramer, James E. King, Robert Ward Presented by: Maeghyn Koehler and Char May Schule
2
"Personality traits describe the stable context-general behavioral biases of an individuals" It had been shown there is a genetic heritability to personality Humans show cross-cultural and cross-species generalization of personality factors Socially relevant personality traits can be identified by static non-expressive faces It is believed that our signal system is evolutionary therefore we will share some traits with other primates Dominance is expressed by extroversion in humans Background
3
Stimuli Started with set of 37 photos from previous study Chose photos: Looking straight on Had no facial expression Were cropped to only the head and neck 15 characteristics were chosen Highest and lowest rating of each chosen
4
Participants were presented with a high-low pair of a characteristic and asked to choose the face that best fit the on screen definition of a personality trait After the participants were asked to rate 1 (young) to 5 (old) the age of the chimpanzees Participants also completed a task of humans of the same task Study 1 Methods
5
Accurate perception of "dominant" and "active" characteristics. Close to significant accurary on "sympathetic." Poor perception of "sociable." Accurate estimate of chimp's age. Characteristics relating to extraversion, and possibly agreeableness, were accuratly perceived in chimpanzee faces. Study 1 Results and Discussion
6
Why do you think participants were able to accurately identify traits of "dominance" and "active" but not the charatertic of "sociable"? Class Discussion
7
Saw a single image of a chimpanzee at a time and asked to rate 1 (very low) to 7 (very high) on the defined characteristic Participants also completed the same task with human faces Study 2 Methods
8
Ratings of dominance significantly correlated with actual dominance. No significance correlations for other characteristics. Accuracy of dominance ratings was not affected by age- related cues. No significant difference in perception of dominance of males and females. The characteristic of dominance was accurately assessed even though participants were unable to compare the faces associated with extreme personality values. Study 2 Results and Discussion
9
Participants were presented a high-low pair of chimpanzees and asked to select the more dominant Each pair was of the same sex Study 3 Methods
10
Significantly accurate perception of dominance for within-sex comparisons of males and females. More accuracy on perception of dominance in males than females. Dominance accurary was present for both males and females. Study 3 Results and Discussion
11
Two blocks were presented: one chimpanzee and one human In the chimpanzee block, high-low pairs of photos were presented and they were asked to identify the more dominant individual In the human block, high-low pairs of photos were presented and they were asked to identify the more extroverted individual Study 4 Methods
12
Significant accuracy of chimp dominance. Significant accuracy of human extraversion. However, there were individual differences in performace on tasks. Particiapant scores on the "social skills" domain of the AQ were negatively correlated with accuracy on human discription task but not on chimp task. Study 4 Results and Discussion
13
Why do you think participants with higher scores on Autism had trouble identifying human characteristics but not with identifying chimpanzee characteristics? Class Discussion
14
The results demonstrate that humans can accurately perceive charactersitics relating to extraversion in chimpanzee faces on the basis of static, nonexpressive cues. Also, people can use cues in human and chimp faces to identify those who are biased toward social activity and dominace-related behaviors. General Discussion
15
The researchers hypothsize a shared signal for personality from the face in humans and chimpanzees on the basis of shared evolutionary past. Humans and chimps evolved to share aspects of a system for communicating behavioral biases to conspecifics. This shared system would involve shared aspects for personality, shared links between personality and facial morphology and shared cognitive mechanisms for processing those links. General Discussion
16
Culture and/or personality of participant may affect participant performance. Although the results demonstrate that people can indentify links between personality and facial morphology in humans and chimps, it is not known wether chimps have similar abilities to process and use these signals. Do you think the researchers are right to assume that chimps also have this ability? How could we test chimpanzee ability to identify personality traits? Confounds and Limitations
17
What are the benefits for the signal sender in this arrangement? Why do you think humans are better at identifying traits of extraversion and dominance than traits like sociable, active or sympathetic? What's the advantage of being able to identify these traits but not others? Class Discussion
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.