Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A case study on the response to Pakistan’s financial turmoil Part A CERIUM Montréal, July 4-10 2010.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A case study on the response to Pakistan’s financial turmoil Part A CERIUM Montréal, July 4-10 2010."— Presentation transcript:

1 A case study on the response to Pakistan’s financial turmoil Part A CERIUM Montréal, July 4-10 2010

2  Low income country  GDP/capita : 9852$ PPP (Current, 2007)  New Asian Tiger?  6-8% growth since 2004  Poverty decreased 10% since 2001 ▪ 17% of the population living below the poverty line in 2008  Strong increases in development/social spending by the government

3  War against terrorism  Political instability  Rising commodities prices  Impact on the poorest  High inflation  Jumped form 8% in 2007 to 25% in 2008

4

5  Recently privatized state-owned banking system  Scarce liquidity in the banking sector  32-40% overnight lending rates  SBP injects liquidity to oil the system  Government raises foreign borrowing by 100%  Deterioration of the government fiscal situation  Downward pressure on the rupee  Stock market halves

6  FDI halves  Low Level of currency reserves ▪ Low of 6 weeks of imports/10 days of oil supplies ▪ Investors loose confidence in the value of the rupee  Inflation is up ▪ Government asks the Central Bank to print money to finance its spending ▪ Depresses value of the rupee  Downgrade of soverign debt ▪ Raises costs of new borrowing on international markets

7

8

9

10  At least 25 % pop (169 million) is living with less than $1 a day  Number of poor in the country had risen from 60 to 77 million just because of food inflation  Poorest 20 percent spent from 50 to 58 percent of their income on cereals

11  Pre crisis obective : raise social spending from 4.3% to 6.5% of GDP in 2010  Education : 2% to 4% of GDP  Health : 0.5% to 1% of GDP  $2bn in aid annually (loans + grants)  10% of the budget  ¼ of tax receipts

12 Montréal, July 9-10 2010

13  Heads of delegation (mission chiefs)  Lead for opening/final speeches  Counsellors  Lead for negociations on various tables and support mission chief in plenary  Secretaries  Leads for final declarations

14  The Government of Pakistan  The IMF  The World Bank  The OECD/donors  China  The European Union  NATO  The US State Department

15  9:00-11:00  Opening speeches ▪ Plenary session (15-20 mins per delegation)  11:00-12:00  Discussion on negotiation themes ▪ Team discussion on negotiation sub-themes (20 mins) ▪ Meet with other parties in sub-groups (20 mins) ▪ 1 delegetate per group ▪ Establishment of ‘tables’ of negotiation (20 mins) ▪ In plenary  Next steps  20 mins

16  Opening speech  20 minutes or 5 pages per team  Negotiating briefs  Team strategy and issue backgrounder for the entire simulation (5 pages)  Team briefs should be produced for every sub-issue (2-3 pages) ▪ These ‘instructions’ should be linked to teams’ overall strategy

17  9:00-11:00  End sub-group discussions  10:30-11:00  Report to team  11:00-12:30  Teams to draft final Declarations (20 minutes, 4 pages)  Should take into account progress made in negotiations during the simulation  2:00-3:00  Teams to delegate members to draft a ‘final communiqué’ (2-3 pages)  3:00-4:00  Final communiqué  Stock taking exercise

18  2-4 pages  Background  What is this meeting all about?  Pre-meeting institutional positions  What are the other parties starting positions?  Desired outcomes?  What are our minimal acceptable outcomes ?  What are our maximal desired outcomes ?  What do we think is achieveble realistically?  What potential tradeoffs should you consider?  What strategies should you use to achieve your optimal outcomes?  Strategy for the big day y

19  Fboutindufresne@imf.org

20 Global response to Pakistan’s crisis Part B CERIUM July 2010

21  Restore Credibility  Reduce fiscal deficit  Contain inflation at 12%  Build up foreign exchange to $12bn  Rationalization of subsidies  Protect the vulnerable  Cash transfers to the poor (Benaznir Butto program)

22  Raise productivity manufacturing/agriculture  Re-affirm govt commitment to private sector-led growth  Invest in infrastructure  Increase spending in social sectors  Increase availability of low cost housing

23  WB : $500 million loan for poverty reduction programs (unofficial)  ADB: $1.5 billion of loans per year through 2011 ($4.5bn total)  Sustain growth, reduce poverty and accelerate the transformation of the economy

24  $7.6bn structural adjustment loan (Stand By Arrangement)  Support program to stabilize and rebuild the economy  Expand its social safety net to protect the poor.

25  Fiscal deficit, excluding grants, will be brought to down from 7.4 percent of GDP in 2007/08 to 4.2 percent in 2008/09  The State Bank Of Pakistan (SBP) will ▪ build its international reserves, ▪ bring down inflation to 6 percent in 2010; and ▪ eliminate central bank financing of the government  Expenditure on the social safety net will be increased to protect the poor ▪ cash transfers ▪ targeted electricity subsidies worth 0.3 percent of GDP

26  Front loading of its grant program (1bn$)

27  April 17th, 2009 Tokyo Donor Conference  Aid base of US$2bn/year  New US Administration and new foreign priorities  Renewed interest in Pakistan in the war against terror

28  Recent developments in Pakistan

29 UN

30 IMF

31 PAKISTAN

32 EUROPEAN UNION

33 USA

34 WORLD BANK GROUP

35 CHINA

36 NATO


Download ppt "A case study on the response to Pakistan’s financial turmoil Part A CERIUM Montréal, July 4-10 2010."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google