Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byZain Buzby Modified over 10 years ago
2
Derives not from the actions of a legislative branch or other central authority, but from tradition and agreements signed by states. Differs in Difficulty of enforcement, which depends on reciprocity, collective action, and international norms
3
Treaties and other written conventions signed by states are the most important source. Are binding on successor governments regardless of that government’s circumstances Pacta sunt servanda UN Charter; The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (1948) Custom is the second major source of international law. Law of the Sea Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) Great Principles of Law Jus gentium (the law of peoples) “general principles of law recognized by civilized nations” (definition by ICJ) Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
4
Legal scholarship is a fourth source. Judicial Decisions and Scholarly Writings International Representatives Assemblies are considered a newly emerging source of international law, though controversial. Example: UN General Assembly Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
5
International law is much more difficult to enforce. Depends heavily on the reciprocity principle. States also follow international law because of the general or long-term costs that could come from disregarding international law. If a state breaks an international law, it may face a collective response by a group of states, such as sanctions. One great weakness: depends entirely on national power; does the aggrieved state have the capability to punish violator? Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
6
Rudiments of a general world legal framework found here Also called the International Court of Justice Jurisdiction limited and caseload light Only states can sue or be sued in the World Court. Is a panel of 15 judges elected to 9-year terms by a majority of both the Security Council and the General Assembly. Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
7
Meets in The Hague, the Netherlands Great weakness States have not agreed in a comprehensive way to subject themselves to its jurisdiction or obey its decisions. Only a third have signed the optional clause in the treaty agreeing to give the Court jurisdiction in certain cases. Main use of the World Court now is to arbitrate issues of secondary importance between countries with friendly relations overall. Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
8
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
9
A party with a dispute that crosses national borders gains several advantages by pursuing the matter through the national courts of one of the relevant states. Judgments are enforceable. Individuals and companies can pursue legal complaints through national courts, whereas in most areas of international law, states must themselves bring suits on behalf of their citizens. There is often a choice of more than one state within which a case could legally be heard; one can pick the legal system most favorable to one’s case. Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
10
U.S. is a favorite jurisdiction within which to bring cases for two reasons: U.S. juries have a reputation for awarding bigger settlements. Because many people and governments do business in the U.S., it is often possible to collect damages awarded by a U.S. Court. Extradition Immigration law Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
11
Bedrock of international law is respect for the rights of diplomats. Diplomatic recognition Credentials Diplomats have the right to occupy an embassy in the host country as though it were their own state’s territory. Diplomatic immunity Espionage Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
12
Diplomatic pouches Breaking diplomatic relations Interests section When two countries lack diplomatic relations, they often do business through a third country willing to represent a country’s interests formally through its own embassy. Recalling their ambassadors Consultation and formal complaints Terrorism – in this context the law of diplomacy is repeatedly violated Tempting targets for terrorists Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
13
International law distinguishes just wars (wars that are legal) from wars of aggression (which are illegal). Today, legality of war is defined by the UN Charter, which outlaws aggression but allows “international police actions.” Strong international norm States have a right to respond to aggression. This is the only allowable use of military force according to just-war doctrine. Just-war approach explicitly rules out war as an instrument to change another state’s government or policies, or for ethnic and religious conflicts. Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
14
The idea of human rights flies in the face of sovereignty and territorial integrity. Consensus on the most important human rights also lacking. Rights are universal versus relative Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
15
Concept of human rights comes from at least three sources Religion Political and legal philosophy Theory of natural law and natural rights (political revolutions brought theory to practice) Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
16
No globally agreed-upon definitions of the essential human rights exist. Often divided into two broad categories: civil-political “negative rights” – free speech, freedom of religion, equal protection under the law, freedom from arbitrary imprisonment economic-social “positive rights” – rights to good living conditions, food, health care, social security, and education Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
17
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) Does not have the force of international law Does set forth international norms Since its adoption, the UN has opened 7 treaties for state signature to further define protections of human rights. Two important treaties: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights Convention Against Torture (CAT), 1987 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
18
Convention on Rights of the Child (CRC),1990 Every country except Somalia and the U.S. has approved it Role of IOs in protecting human rights Today, NGOs play a key role in efforts to win basic political rights in authoritarian countries Amnesty International Publicity and pressure Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.